BoredDragon said:
Why else buy a game if you're not going to use half of the content? Besides, I completely agree with Yahtzee that all fully priced games should come with an at least decent single player. That way if the mutliplayer gets abandoned (Deadrising 2) or becomes insufferable because of the fanbase (Halo in my opinion) there is still something to fall back on.
CoD is no exception, especially since prolonged exposure to campers, tubers, and all other dicks that inhabit that area of cyber space is harmful to all breakable objects in my immediate vicinity.
Because the single player is crap?
We buy lots of things that are half crap, that doesn't mean we have to consume it just to "get our money's worth". I think I felt WORSE after playing Blops' single player it was so awful.
Yes, CoD
SHOULD have a good single player but undeniably for the last one it did not.
And yet it was the "biggest entertainment launch... ever" that was built off the back of the multiplayer. The plot wasn't even relevant, it wasn't a sequel continuing the story of MW2 nor anything. It effectively IS a multiplayer only game for the large part of its success.
And is that a problem? TF2, L4D, ARMA and Killing Floor do great with no real single-player mode. Though coming off the back of Bioshock I sure do miss that more games don't have a really focused and great multiplayer.
PS: I play Black-ops on PC, haven't seen much blatant camping/tubers. Lots of FAMAS though.