Agnostic. I went through a period of atheism, but when the question of how the universe was created, I found atheism unable to answer, so Agnostic, IMHO, would be the best.
I have no qualms with people believing this or that. I do have a problem when they use this belief as an excuse to commit atrocities. Religion, in its purest form, IMO, never states to harm. It's human interpretation/manipulation which justifies atrocities. It's the human which write that it's ok to kill, rape and pillage, all in the name of .
I also have a pet hate for preachers. I don't care if you think I'm gonna go to Hell, I'm fine with my beliefs, thank you very much. I have friends who are religious. They don't talk to me about religion, unless it ends up in the conversation. They live by their choices, and they respect mine.
See, I have this, sort of, notion about religion. I believe religion was created in a time where there was no organised government; where anarchy reigned. In this time period, it eventually became known that prophet(s) talked to a divine being, and had brought a set of rules for the people to live by. This created an abiding set of laws, which, subsequently, created peace. This, IMO, is the role of organised religion; to create a set of rules to live life without constant threat of attack, helping other people, where humans could be in peace, attained by promising paradise to the virtuous, and eternal damnation to those who disobeyed (something humans can't comprehend fully, but are smart enough to realise paradice=good, damnation=bad).
Of course, whatever I have said is my own belief. I'm sorry if I've offended anybody.