Poll: Do you believe in the afterlife?

Recommended Videos

Random berk

New member
Sep 1, 2010
9,636
0
0
Random berk said:
tjcross said:
Random berk said:
tjcross said:
Spectral Dragon said:
tjcross said:
Wieke said:
As an Physicalist [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physicalism] I don't see any reason to believe in an afterlife.

Hey I'd like to keep on existing as much as the next guy, but I just don't see how it would be possible. Not to mention the total lack of evidence. And that most afterlives come with some sort of religion attached to it.
it is impossible to prove god does not exist and unless god shows up it's impossible to prove god exists so arguing evidence is not going to get to anywhere since if there is an all mighty being that made everything it could easily avoid detection and if there isn't then people can just say it's hiding on another plane of existence or something
btw this isn't target directly at you, you just got this idea to pop in my head
However, Occam's razor makes a God seem very implausible. Basically, the less assumptions you have to make to form a theory, the more likely it is to be true. However, why WOULD God hide? Why not show itself and convince atheists?

That said, I believe the same thing happens when we die as before we were born. How'd that feel? Well, absolutely nothing. I see no evidence or reason behind an afterlife, so my belief is that there is none.
simple god doesn't care if you think about it why would an almighty being care about one insignificant race when he is making an entire plane of existence, not only that but if that race found him they would constantly bug him for every whim they desire and thus he would have to hide again or more likely kill them all. an example would be if you had 1000 ant farms would you care if one was trying to break out and if it did break out wouldn't you just grab the ant traps and kill them all.
If God didn't care enough about whether people believed in him or not to show athiests that he exists, then why would he condemn a person to unimaginable, never-ending agony just for not believing in him, as the crazy ones like to keep telling us?

As to your hypothetical question- kill all the ants just because one got out of the farm? Why?
for question number 1: he doesn't i believe in reincarnation god set up a system so that he wouldn't have to constantly pump new souls into the world
Question 2: you misunderstood the example the ant traps are only to kill the escapees not the ones that are still in the ant farms
1. Fair enough.

2. Thats still pretty harsh. Why couldn't you just capture the ants and return them to the farm? Or better yet, let them go free into the wild? Ants are living things too!
yes but what a pain it would be gathering each one before they got in your food and cloths and then making sure they stay out of you house or don't escape again. honestly the majority of people would kill them (and some of that portion would eat them) and i believe that god is just a really powerful person. also the "ants are people to" line made me laugh thanks for that it brightened my day
You're very welcome.:)
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
Fluffles said:
Guest said:
I wasn't trying to say lightning wasn't understood, I was saying how we knew about even before we understood it.

You can believe that the human will be fully explained in the future, but can't see how something as complex and emotional and inconsistant as human beings will ever be fully explained by chemical reactions in the brain.

That's not lazyness, it's my belief about how to explain the unexplained. If you think that is a lazy assumption, then so is darkmatter. Or the graviton. Or a myriad other scientific theories that have no evidence to support them, we just assume they must exist because we can see their effects.

It's called deduction, maybe you should try it sometime, you might learn something.
No. No. No. No. No. No.
If we don't understand something at all we say it's an unknown. The beginning of the universe is an unknown, but the expansion isn't. The expansion WAS an unknown, but that does not mean you can assign something intangible to it to "explain" it. That just means you're making excuses.
Dark matter has a shittonne of maths and evidence to support it. We can see the effects of the problem it is postulated to solve, we actually have observation evidence that supports it.
Kinda the same thing with the graviton. There are experiments that are trying to find such things. These are testable hypotheses.
What people who believe in the afterlife or a god have are untestable excuses for a lack of understanding. There is a complete lack of evidence for them, not just a scarcity of evidence, a complete and utter lack of it.
Actually no. Darkmatter is a fucking joke. It's a placeholder. The math says that the universe should have 5 times more mass than we can find, so we said that there must be some weird undetectable matter called darkmatter. That's it. Same with the graviton, we know that gravity works, but we don't know how. We know that many of the other elemental forces(if not all) function through subatomic particles, and so someone said that it must be the graviton. When in reality, we have absolutely no idea what it is. It could be the mole people running on giant hamster wheels in the center of Titan. We don't know. And there are numerous scientific theories that we accept as fact, that we don't even come close to understanding.

You may see a complete lack of understanding, I see our inability to fully understand the human mind as evidence. In fact, to drive home the point I made above, darwinism doesn't really explain everything. Darwin himself laid out a series of assumptions that his work was based on, going so far as to imply that if these assumptions were false, natural selection could not explain certain steps of evolution. Many of these assumptions were wrong. I see that as evidence of god/intelligent design. I see thousands of pieces of evidence every day. But that is completely besides the point because here is the ultimate truth about faith.

Faith isn't something you use to blind yourself to demonstrable fact, it is something you believe in when you face a lack of evidence. I have faith in the afterlife. that doesn't make me less intelligent than you. That just means that I believe in something. And no matter how much you feel inadequate compared to people capable of faith, nothing you say will stop us from believing. And furthermore, nothing you say or do will make your superiority over us into a reality.
 

Spectral Dragon

New member
Jun 14, 2011
283
0
0
tjcross said:
i have very little knowledge about genetics so a link describing that fact would be appriciated. i believe that the soul contains part of the personality and which is altered by outside factors the soul mostly is my means of explaining natural talent. also if a soul cannot do what it is used to doing well nothing happens until that button gets pushed and then what happens is dependent on the situation.
a metaphor (a tool i love dearly) for my beliefs of the souls effect on personality is this:
The soul is like the sand when drenched with the waters of life it can be made into almost any shape but it is easy for it to be altered or changed entirly.

also i think the world does have a set amount of souls but the world was given a large amount to counter that and to be clear i believe every living thing has a soul animals, bugs, trees all have souls and they are all the same type of soul so a human can be reborn as a bear or a worm or a flower or another human.

as a sidenote i'm also curious i figure that by exploring others ideas and defending my own will only lead me into thinking deeper into my own beliefs and expanding the way in which i can see the world.
This seems to be adequate: http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/behavior.shtml
"Behaviors change in response to alterations in biological structures or processes. For example, a brain injury can turn a polite, mild-mannered person into a foul-mouthed, aggressive boor, and we routinely modify the behavioral manifestations of mental illnesses with drugs that alter brain chemistry. More recently, geneticists have created or extinguished specific mouse behaviors?ranging from nurturing of pups to continuous circling in a strain called "twirler"? by inserting or disabling specific genes."
That's an interesting metaphor. Then what difference does it make, since our souls don't really seem to affect us in more than that we have one?

Alright, so the population of the entire universe, according to you, cannot grow? Then there must be some sort of destiny for this to work, otherwise it can't be constant - if someone is born something else HAS to die.

One cannot ask for more in a discussion. I find it easier to argue with someone, since I usually just form theories on my own. Which is more accurate than beliefs, since I trust science!
 

4RM3D

New member
May 10, 2011
1,738
0
0
Spectral Dragon said:
That's an interesting metaphor. Then what difference does it make, since our souls don't really seem to affect us in more than that we have one?
I also said that in my previous post. But there I mentioned consciousness and memories, rather than souls and brain function. But the principle is the same, I guess.
 

baker80

New member
Oct 17, 2008
102
0
0
I voted "nothing", but that's mostly what I hope is the truth. The world is a horrible place full of monsters. If God exists, he's an absolute bastard for allowing all of this shit to exist. There is no hope for justice in the afterlife, because there's no hope for justice in the before-death. Oblivion is literally the best any of us can hope for.
 

Spectral Dragon

New member
Jun 14, 2011
283
0
0
4RM3D said:
I also said that in my previous post. But there I mentioned consciousness and memories, rather than souls and brain function. But the principle is the same, I guess.
Yeah, so if the memories are formed and stored in the brain, what would the purpose of the soul be? If it serves no purpose, then why believe in it other than "it'd be nice"?

I've read your post, and considered it. Although, how would we remember dying? In this scenario of dreams and relative observation, wouldn't dying be closer to falling asleep, therefore making it more likely for us to remember birth, assuming some form of reincarnation?
How would we experience anything without the electrical impulses that flow through our brain when we're alive? It is interesting though, since at the moment of death, the brain activity surges, but we're nto sure how long it lasts for the observer. It's possible with an observed eternity, but I don't know if it's likely.
 

afroebob

New member
Oct 1, 2011
470
0
0
Well, personally I do but I also want to say that if you came here looking for an accurate consensus you made a mistake. The internet is the perfect place for minorities to hate on the majorities they so dearly despise, and the minority of atheists are no exception. In actuality they are probably the most common because of there wrongful persecution throughout history (I say wrongful in the sense of immoral, not the since of right OR wrong on whether their beliefs are true). Its a pretty well accepted by historians that there was a dude named Jesus (well, that wasn't his real name) who went around and preached about God, tolerance, brotherhood and peace and I think that we have strayed from all but the first as humans (and by accepted that Jesus was real means that he existed, not that he was the son of God because that is debatable) and that if we strayed back onto the lessons he taught about morality we could all live in a better world. Jesus said 'Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.'

Now I included the whole quote for the whole thing to make since but what I want you to focus on is the second commandment. He says love thy neighbour as thyself, not love thy neighboor as thyself as long as he follows the same beliefs, is the same color, has the same sexual oriantation, etc. I think that Christians have fallen off there moral compass set by the one who they are supposed to be worshiping and on the side of morality I think good peron can agree that what Jesus taught was right (before you get the wrong idea, I am not talking about everyone agreeing with his ideas on religion, but on love, friendship, peace, forgiveness).
 

iblis666

New member
Sep 8, 2008
1,106
0
0
no idea if there is one or not but i hope there is one even if I will be tortured for all of eternity
 

tjcross

New member
Apr 14, 2008
342
0
0
Spectral Dragon said:
Then what difference does it make, since our souls don't really seem to affect us in more than that we have one?
actually that's kind of it in my teens i couldn't sleep due to an inability to cope with the possibility of my existence ending at death after many months of thinking i came upon on the belief of the soul being eternal and that's all i needed after i got the core idea whenever i was bored i'd expand upon it to my current set of beliefs. also yes at some point we will reach a point were one being will have to die for another to be born but again i think that god gave a rather large amount of "extra" souls so that it would be unlikely for that number to be reached.
ps: thanks for the link i found it interesting
 

JoCharlie266

New member
Dec 11, 2010
9
0
0
Redlin5 said:
I believe there is an afterlife but that nobody has any idea what is like. It's comforting to think that after death my soul will move on instead of just believing I'll be a pile of meat.
launchpadmcqwak said:
i believe when you die you decompose and become other life...its a bit jedi but its pretty much what happens and my fear of death is reduced greatly by this philosophy or whatever it is...
So you only believe it because it's comforting? That's a very poor reason to accept something as true.

lunncal said:
TheOneMavado said:
Your question isn't very well phrased; THE afterlife? Which one are you referring to?

But to answer; I think that the belief in an afterlife is delusional at best, insane at the worst.
Well yeah, I'm sure you do think that. Religious people would think that not believing in afterlife is delusional at best, and I personally think that believing you know either way is delusional at best.

Just don't go around thinking you're smarter than others because of your beliefs.

... And yes, not believing in an afterlife is just as much a religious belief as believing in one.
How is rejecting the claim of an afterlife a religious belief? When there is no evidence to support something the rational position is to reject the claim. That doesn't mean dogmatically holding the opposite position, but instead not granting it any legitimacy until there is significant evidence to support it. The more outlandish a claim is the more evidence it requires.

Twilight_guy said:
I believe in an afterlife because of my religion. I also don't think anyone can prove wither or not their is an afterlife as its not an issue of science.
Yes. However, no one can prove or disprove that there is an invisible, intangible, inaudible, orange unicorn in the room with me right now.
 

Roxor

New member
Nov 4, 2010
747
0
0
No. I don't believe in an afterlife. In my eyes, it's just another form of immortality, and I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy.

The statistics of the poll are interesting, though. The world figure for stating no religion is about a sixth of the population. The poll's results give a figure of more than half. Clearly there's something influencing the demographics around here. What, exactly, I don't know, but it's still an interesting observation.
 

Zack Alklazaris

New member
Oct 6, 2011
1,938
0
0
I would like to think that there is so much of this universe left to understand that there is a possibility that a conscious could possibly return to some sort of "mind soup". However, evidence so far seems to point more to no than yes.

First off there may only be 7 billion people on the planet, but what about every single (or nearly every single if you do that heaven/hell thing) that has ever died? We go into the trillions. Imagine 2 trillion people in heaven thats just huge, not to mention the language barrier.
Now what about pets and animals? Are we so mighty of ourselves that we see other lifeforms as less than worthy of the same treatment of death that we give ourselves?
And then theres the psychological aspect, we fear the unknown the uncontrollable. Death is the masters of these forms, it would be natural for human beings to try and create a figurative "security blanket" to make these worries go away. It also makes for much better fighters if you going to war.

I don't know. Despite what I say above I am still neutral on the subject. Can anyone really prove or disprove such a thing?
 

DEAD34345

New member
Aug 18, 2010
1,929
0
0
JoCharlie266 said:
lunncal said:
... And yes, not believing in an afterlife is just as much a religious belief as believing in one.
How is rejecting the claim of an afterlife a religious belief? When there is no evidence to support something the rational position is to reject the claim. That doesn't mean dogmatically holding the opposite position, but instead not granting it any legitimacy until there is significant evidence to support it. The more outlandish a claim is the more evidence it requires.
I've already had this argument. I was basically trying to say that believing that there definitely isn't a god is a religious belief.

Also, more outlandish claims don't require more evidence at all, in my opinion. Many claims that seem to completely defy common sense have been proven over the years, we have no reason to suspect that our universe isn't completely bizarre and outlandish, because so far we've found out that it is.

I.E. The world isn't flat, it's actually a giant ball floating around a much larger giant ball of gas, which is part of a giant system of giant balls of gas (and other stuff) all spinning around an approximately central point, and also there's billions of these giant systems, which for some reason all exploded out of one point billions of years ago.

And that's just the relatively mundane stuff we've already come to accept. It gets really freaky when you start to think about quantum physics and the like. I can honestly say that the presence of a god that just magically created everything one day would be far less bizarre than the truth (or at least, what we've discovered of the truth so far).
 

Spectral Dragon

New member
Jun 14, 2011
283
0
0
tjcross said:
Spectral Dragon said:
Then what difference does it make, since our souls don't really seem to affect us in more than that we have one?
actually that's kind of it in my teens i couldn't sleep due to an inability to cope with the possibility of my existence ending at death after many months of thinking i came upon on the belief of the soul being eternal and that's all i needed after i got the core idea whenever i was bored i'd expand upon it to my current set of beliefs. also yes at some point we will reach a point were one being will have to die for another to be born but again i think that god gave a rather large amount of "extra" souls so that it would be unlikely for that number to be reached.
ps: thanks for the link i found it interesting
I've noticed that, more often people believe not because they think it must be true, but because the alternative's a lot scarier. I understand, anyway, even if I don't share those beliefs. But who knows? Our minds are peculiar things. Something could live on. We'll see, won't we? I'll even make a bet on it. If I see you in the afterlife, I owe you $50. If not, you owe me.

No worries, and have a good life!
 

JoCharlie266

New member
Dec 11, 2010
9
0
0
lunncal said:
JoCharlie266 said:
lunncal said:
... And yes, not believing in an afterlife is just as much a religious belief as believing in one.
How is rejecting the claim of an afterlife a religious belief? When there is no evidence to support something the rational position is to reject the claim. That doesn't mean dogmatically holding the opposite position, but instead not granting it any legitimacy until there is significant evidence to support it. The more outlandish a claim is the more evidence it requires.
I've already had this argument. I was basically trying to say that believing that there definitely isn't a god is a religious belief.
It's a belief about religion, but a religious belief? I don't know... unless your religion requires you to hold the position.

lunncal said:
Also, more outlandish claims don't require more evidence at all, in my opinion. Many claims that seem to completely defy common sense have been proven over the years, we have no reason to suspect that our universe isn't completely bizarre and outlandish, because so far we've found out that it is.
Oh man, everything is super crazy, and this freaks me out all the time. But crazy shit is proven by lots of evidence. If we don't require a higher standard of evidence for more extraordinary claims we'll accept things that aren't true constantly. I mean, if someone said they had a dog and I was skeptical, if I was over at their house and saw dog food I'd be like "okay, they probably have a dog." If they said they had a dragon no amount of evidence would convince me of this unless I actually saw the freakin' dragon.
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,836
0
0
JoCharlie266 said:
Redlin5 said:
I believe there is an afterlife but that nobody has any idea what is like. It's comforting to think that after death my soul will move on instead of just believing I'll be a pile of meat.
So you only believe it because it's comforting? That's a very poor reason to accept something as true.
Maybe to you. Comfort is important enough for me.