That right there sums it up. Instead of calling it 'manspreading' how about we just put up a unisex warning for everyone: using up more space than necessary is rude when space is limited and possibly a fine-able offence in extreme cases. For example during peak hours people could be expected to sit with their knees close together and not to bring more than they can carry in their lap.Lightknight said:So essentially it is most commonly shaming a man for having balls at all. That's not something we can help. We don't have to sit with our knees miles apart. But some spreadage is certainly more comfortable than none and if plenty alternate seating is ability the who the fuck cares? I don't care if someone is laying across seats to take a nap as long as there's enough seating. Why is it so important to control other people just because we want them to sit a certain way? That's pre-school crap.
I just said that women more frequently take up more space with bags, as opposed to spreading their legs.Phasmal said:Oh c'mon dude, men totally do the bag thing too. It's not a case of men have to sit spread out because of their spacehopper balls and women viciously handbag all over the place. I think we can agree people of any gender are capable of being reasonable human beings and also space-wasting jerks.Lightknight said:Women most frequently do the same thing with their purses or shopping bags but as far as I know it isn't necessarily more comfortable for them to sit that way because they're not squishing their goods when sitting with legs crossed or together.
Yeah, hogging space. Done.Synigma said:That right there sums it up. Instead of calling it 'manspreading' how about we just put up a unisex warning for everyone: using up more space than necessary is rude when space is limited and possibly a fine-able offence in extreme cases. For example during peak hours people could be expected to sit with their knees close together and not to bring more than they can carry in their lap.Lightknight said:So essentially it is most commonly shaming a man for having balls at all. That's not something we can help. We don't have to sit with our knees miles apart. But some spreadage is certainly more comfortable than none and if plenty alternate seating is ability the who the fuck cares? I don't care if someone is laying across seats to take a nap as long as there's enough seating. Why is it so important to control other people just because we want them to sit a certain way? That's pre-school crap.
Yeah, I know. I dunno, maybe I thought it looked weird because a lot of your post was about how spreading legs was more comfortable for men and to me it kinda sounded like men have to sit with their legs apart so can't be blamed for 'spreading' whereas women don't have to and just shove their bags everywhere. I think everyone does the bag thing sometimes.Lightknight said:I just said that women more frequently take up more space with bags, as opposed to spreading their legs.Phasmal said:Oh c'mon dude, men totally do the bag thing too. It's not a case of men have to sit spread out because of their spacehopper balls and women viciously handbag all over the place. I think we can agree people of any gender are capable of being reasonable human beings and also space-wasting jerks.Lightknight said:Women most frequently do the same thing with their purses or shopping bags but as far as I know it isn't necessarily more comfortable for them to sit that way because they're not squishing their goods when sitting with legs crossed or together.
It is merely more comfortable for men to spread their legs than not to. I do not take offense to being mad at a person spreading out all over the place when seats are limited. I do take offense to people complaining that a guy is making himself comfortable when seating is completely available. Like those internet-shaming pictures of guys on mostly empty buses as though they're doing something wrong.Phasmal said:Yeah, I know. I dunno, maybe I thought it looked weird because a lot of your post was about how spreading legs was more comfortable for men and to me it kinda sounded like men have to sit with their legs apart so can't be blamed for 'spreading' whereas women don't have to and just shove their bags everywhere. I think everyone does the bag thing sometimes.Lightknight said:I just said that women more frequently take up more space with bags, as opposed to spreading their legs.Phasmal said:Oh c'mon dude, men totally do the bag thing too. It's not a case of men have to sit spread out because of their spacehopper balls and women viciously handbag all over the place. I think we can agree people of any gender are capable of being reasonable human beings and also space-wasting jerks.Lightknight said:Women most frequently do the same thing with their purses or shopping bags but as far as I know it isn't necessarily more comfortable for them to sit that way because they're not squishing their goods when sitting with legs crossed or together.
It's totally cool if that's not what you meant though, nvm if that's the case. Carry on.
[small]Also off-topic but holy shit there was just a massive rumble of thunder out of nowhere and I nearly jumped a foot in the air[/small]
It's not the package so much as the berries that cause discomfort. Most of us can sit for a decent while with legs close together before they start to ache and we really don't have to go into some kind of obtuse angle to get relief.CaitSeith said:Manspread? Never heard of that term before. Kids these days and their crazy new words...
*grumble* *grumble*
OT: Unless you have a big package, I think you can afford to keep the legs just slightly open. It doesn't have to be "all or nothing", you know?
Yeah, I get that guys prefer to sit with legs apart sometimes, ladies do too sometimes.Lightknight said:It is merely more comfortable for men to spread their legs than not to. I do not take offense to being mad at a person spreading out all over the place when seats are limited. I do take offense to people complaining that a guy is making himself comfortable when seating is completely available. Like those internet-shaming pictures of guys on mostly empty buses as though they're doing something wrong.
There have been worse things to make a first post about and this topic doesn't come with much risk of getting yourself banned as some past topics have. In any case, welcome to the Escapist.Mr. Matt said:I would say that it depends on the trousers one is wearing. When donning denim, I find that if I don't have wide-angle legs, I get uncomfortable... bunching. With regular trousers it's less of an issue. I do avoid doing so when in close proximity to other people - not out of any sense of politeness, but more because I just don't want to catch leg diseases off strangers. That's a thing, right?
My first post on this forum is about my groin. Start as you mean to go on, I guess.
I do indeed run into that problem. It's how I flirt (I think).maninahat said:Ah, but don't you run into that related problem wherein your crossed leg comes dangerously close to touching the foot of the next person crossing their leg? I find myself swapping legs to match their chirality.
Same here, never heard of that term before and now I'm thinking that people are scraping the bottom of the barrel of things to complain about.CaitSeith said:Manspread? Never heard of that term before. Kids these days and their crazy new words...
*grumble* *grumble*
OT: Unless you have a big package, I think you can afford to keep the legs just slightly open. It doesn't have to be "all or nothing", you know?
Actually, it's Soylent Green in a sandwich topping format.Zykon TheLich said:Huh. I was assuming Manspread was a new type of sandwich spread made out of old engine oil, ghost peppers and nails.
Not according to CAFE:Phasmal said:Sometimes I think the issue is a little overblown, I mean, guys are clearly both capable and often comfortable sitting with legs closed or crossed, even if not always.
If Wikipedia's not good enough, here's the source:The Canadian Association for Equality (CAFE), a Canadian men's rights group, has been critical of campaigns against manspreading by transit authorities. The CAFE has argued that it is "physically painful for men to close their legs" and that campaigns against manspreading is comparable to "[forcing] women to stop breast feeding on busses or trains".[11]
I'm not sure whether to laugh or headdesk.?It?s physically painful for men to close their legs and we cannot be expected to do so, and it?s also a biological necessity for us to do so,? the campaign states. ?We can?t force woman to stop breast feeding on busses (sic) or trains and we can?t force them to stop bringing strollers on, why should we force men to close their legs? This is sexism plain and simple and it cannot be passed.?
What we need to do is get talking about the real issue. Why are we being discriminated against? I can't remember the last time I went to buy pants and haven't felt muscle shamed about my thighs and butt. (All kidding aside I feel your pain haha)Saulkar said:At the same time I have freaking enormous thighs as a powerlifter so I do not how that factors in, if at all.