Poll: Do you Min-max with your RPG parties or do you pick what looks cool?

Recommended Videos

teqrevisited

New member
Mar 17, 2010
2,343
0
0
I did once go for the complete game-breaking stat whoring path and all it took was a hell of a lot of time. Everything died instantly and I was completely untouchable. Boring.

All I usually do is think "I wonder what I might need" and if I like the look of it I'll use it. The chaotic, unpredictable route is always more fun for me.
 

DRTJR

New member
Aug 7, 2009
651
0
0
At the lower levels I go with what's best. At higher levels it's all shock and awe.
 

Ascarus

New member
Feb 5, 2010
605
0
0
in my experience, unless you are playing on the harder difficulty levels, it doesn't matter at all who is in your party regardless of the RPG. so in most games, i go with the characters i happen to like the most.

if i chose to play at the harder difficulty levels where party choice has a greater impact, then yeah, min / maxing becomes more relevant.
 

Don Savik

New member
Aug 27, 2011
915
0
0
I hate games that force stats over aesthetics. I'll take being a special snowflake over an overused optimal flavor-of-the-month strategy any day of my LIFE. I hate people that piss all over immersion for the sake of numbers. It just boils my cabbage.
 

Rblade

New member
Mar 1, 2010
497
0
0
I ussually minmax to the best of my ability. Although I won't read guides before hand or restart a game because my build is suboptimal
 

Catrixa

New member
May 21, 2011
209
0
0
It depends on the game, really. For MMO's I'll min-max right up to just after character creation, because I'll be damned if I'm going to pick a race for its 1% bonus to whatever over a race/class combo that I actually like. Plus, for games like WoW, leveling in min-max mode can actually be pretty challenging if you're playing a class you know. But any time my worth as a human being is decided by 5 minutes of generating random numbers, I'll pick the build and gear that makes the highest numbers appear most of the time.

For co-op games, it's what I like and what my friends need at the time. If I roll a mage, but we're eating damage pies because no one is tanking or supporting, I'll forego amazing dps for support, and switch to a more useful class if necessary or practical.

For single player games, especially Skyrim, I usually take skills I think my character would want (but not skills that are completely useless, like about half the skills in Might and Magic VIII). I've broken my own darned immersion in Skyrim before by trying to make a character who is good at everything.

For D&D, I'm trying to DM, and find it's much easier to use pre-made monsters than make my own xD. But then again, I'm playing 4ed, which is evil and horrible, but much easier to learn for a group of people who honestly don't know much about D&D...
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
I'm not sure what "Min-maxing" is, but I generally only put my points into skills that I'm actually going to be using, or that I think will be useful.
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
lacktheknack said:
Playing a linguist in Daggerfall? Simultaneously agonizing and rewarding.
You, sir, are awesome. Here's one internet for you. Got chatty with them spriggans? That's one thing I admit I thought of, but then decided to go with long blades anyway cause a daedric daikatana looked kind of nice on my relatively scantily clad dunmer vampire lady (oh, do I win an internet for that? Vampirism was such a hassle in DF...)
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,178
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
A little from column A, a little from column B.
Pretty much this. I generally try to min-max, but if something comes along that I find just wicked awesome, I'm going to go with that, regardless of the stat differential.

One of the better examples of what I'm talking about is in Dragon Age: Origins. As a dps warrior, my character wears nothing but the Warden Commander armor, no matter what. Through every additional campaign and so on. Nothing can make me swap that gear out because it looks so awesome.

Another good example is in New Vegas. My character wears the NCR duster from the instant I can get it (and with mods, I get a non-faction version basically right after walking out of Doc Mitchell's house) and a black cowboy hat, and I never, ever change my gear, even when I've got power armor or the stuff I'm wearing breaks, because it looks way too damn cool.
 

XMark

New member
Jan 25, 2010
1,408
0
0
1 healer, 1 heavy-hitter
The rest of the party members I choose according to whatever feels right for the game.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Vegosiux said:
lacktheknack said:
Playing a linguist in Daggerfall? Simultaneously agonizing and rewarding.
You, sir, are awesome. Here's one internet for you. Got chatty with them spriggans? That's one thing I admit I thought of, but then decided to go with long blades anyway cause a daedric daikatana looked kind of nice on my relatively scantily clad dunmer vampire lady (oh, do I win an internet for that? Vampirism was such a hassle in DF...)
I dunno, I always turned into a werewolf first.

But yeah, a linguist is all nine languages in the first nine slots, then hand-to-hand, ettiquette/streetwise and one skill of your choice in the last three. SHEESH. Hard to level up, too.

If you played a linguistic vampire, you would WIN ALL THE INTERNETS.
 

justnotcricket

Echappe, retire, sous sus PANIC!
Apr 24, 2008
1,205
0
0
Thanatos5150 said:
justnotcricket said:
Alexias_Sandar said:
I play my character. If this makes me an awesome combat god...yay. If not...also yay. It's worked out rather well for me...and with quite a few very capable and successful characters. Sometimes at battle, sometimes at other things...sometimes at just about everything they touch. *shrug* I'd rather follow where their roleplay and the story takes me. Now, am I going to play someone that's utterly useless intentionally from the get go for 'RP'? No. Those 'RP Purists' who believe actively screwing their character over and making them useless means they're 'better roleplayers' are idiots.
There's actually a name for what the other guy was doing.
We call it the "Stormwind Fallacy".
<--*Looks up the Stormwind Fallacy*

Ohhh... Ha, I didn't realise I'd summed this up out of my own experience! :-D Stormwind makes an excellent point.