Perhaps you could also think why it would be justifiable for a man like that to better his situation by harming another?Sparrow Tag said:
Poll: Do you own a gun? If so, why?
- Thread starter cyber_andyy
- Start date
Recommended Videos
For defense, fun, and sometimes for use when bored, cause loading, unloading, and then reloading a mag is actually quite therapeutic, especially when you unload by firing it.
Before I hit the sack I'd like to make a statement about something I learned from this thread. Those up on the moral high ground tend to shout alot for whatever reason. They also can't seem to hear those below them, probably because their so damn high up. Not sure if anyone will understand that but it seemed to make a whole lot of sense in my head.
Don't currently own any, planning on purchasing a shotgun as soon as I get the disposable income and a handgun once I turn twenty-one.
The only things I seem myself using them for is target shooting and protection in the event of a riot/civil unrest/general breakdown of the social order.
I don't know where he got that because I'm certain it isn't something civilians are allowed to legally possess.
I mean, I am not a violent person. I consider the execution of dangerous criminals a barbaric and antiquated practice. But, if it came down to one man threatening my life or the life of a close friend or family member, and was left with no other options but kill-or-be-killed, I wouldn't hesitate to gun him down in cold blood.
The only things I seem myself using them for is target shooting and protection in the event of a riot/civil unrest/general breakdown of the social order.
A friend of my dad's used to live on his boat. He kept an M79 on board in case of pirates.Finnboghi said:
I don't know where he got that because I'm certain it isn't something civilians are allowed to legally possess.
Hmm, honestly, that is the only situation I could justify killing someone.Sparrow Tag said:
I mean, I am not a violent person. I consider the execution of dangerous criminals a barbaric and antiquated practice. But, if it came down to one man threatening my life or the life of a close friend or family member, and was left with no other options but kill-or-be-killed, I wouldn't hesitate to gun him down in cold blood.
i will own one as soon as i can afford one. I like shooting them. Its a great stress relief to go down to the shooting range and just tear up a piece of paper..... My uncle has a big collection of guns that he is going to leave to me in his will because I am the gun nut of the family besides him. We're going hunting soon 
..........................WTF. You value a guy who's breaking into your house and is about to kill you more than yourself. Either you think way too highly of criminals or you need self-esteem.Sparrow Tag said:
Do you have any people in your life you love? Would you kill a criminal to save their lives?
I've got a replica pistol that looks like it's from the 1870s, that's all.
you wouldn't kill to save your life, but you would to kill a guy for thinking guns are a sign of manliness.Sparrow Tag said:
Simply put my belief on personal armament is that I feel that it's my god (and law) given right to go down shooting if I believe in something (or disagree with something) enough. Don't misunderstand, I'm obviously not in jail as I don't go swaggering around pointing
guns at everyone or whatever.
Part of it's personal defense, but that defense also applies against the goverment as well as criminals. As a law abiding citizen if I ever wind up getting into trouble with the law to the point where someone tries to arrest me (which I will point out has not happened) chances are it's going to be a sign that something is really borked somewhere, and I am going to make it as difficult, and painful as possible for them to dig me out.
Some will call me psycho, others will understand exactly where I'm coming from. I see guns as being one of the things that keep us free. As long as we're armed, we're not TOTALLY at anyone's mercy, whether it be criminals, or even our own goverment. Without a couple of weapons (firearms included) around my residence I wouldn't feel comfortable. No need to tote them around (I don't have a concealed carry liscence), but it's good to know it's around if I need it.
Ironically, I find it disturbing to see anti-gun sentiment on the rise at the same time some polls are saying that over half the population is supporting Socialism over Capitolism. It won't happen overnight, but I feel almost like I'm watching a train wreck in slow motion. The grass on the other side of the pasture always being greener, and people not realizing that once some things are done, it's not like we can ever go back.
>>>----Therumancer--->
guns at everyone or whatever.
Part of it's personal defense, but that defense also applies against the goverment as well as criminals. As a law abiding citizen if I ever wind up getting into trouble with the law to the point where someone tries to arrest me (which I will point out has not happened) chances are it's going to be a sign that something is really borked somewhere, and I am going to make it as difficult, and painful as possible for them to dig me out.
Some will call me psycho, others will understand exactly where I'm coming from. I see guns as being one of the things that keep us free. As long as we're armed, we're not TOTALLY at anyone's mercy, whether it be criminals, or even our own goverment. Without a couple of weapons (firearms included) around my residence I wouldn't feel comfortable. No need to tote them around (I don't have a concealed carry liscence), but it's good to know it's around if I need it.
Ironically, I find it disturbing to see anti-gun sentiment on the rise at the same time some polls are saying that over half the population is supporting Socialism over Capitolism. It won't happen overnight, but I feel almost like I'm watching a train wreck in slow motion. The grass on the other side of the pasture always being greener, and people not realizing that once some things are done, it's not like we can ever go back.
>>>----Therumancer--->
im looking at this thread in awe, seeing how everyone here seems to own a lethal weapon, while us canadians dont get the luxury of having something that can put a hole through someone's face at their own will.
Oh no! Gun control and free health care comin' our way, hit the deck!
In Europe, the "train wreck" has already happened and most of us (except for the ultra-liberals who wanna give the dentists and managers more money) are happy with this system we call social democracy.
In Europe, the "train wreck" has already happened and most of us (except for the ultra-liberals who wanna give the dentists and managers more money) are happy with this system we call social democracy.
This.Therumancer said:
Also, I'm pretty sure the second ammendment was made to give us a reset button. It's pretty sad that a 13 year old knows this but it is very rarely argued
Why are you grouping free health care and gun control together?Skeleon said:
Canadians don't have knives?ultimatechance said:
Even if you weren't running away from the gun in my hand you'd just be running away from the guns attached to my SHOULDERS! GRRRRR!Flap Jack452 said:
So ability to handle a powerful gun means you're manly?letsnoobtehpwns said:
Sounds like a pretty narrow, and immature view on manliness.
Plus, it sounds like you need strength and training to handle the rifles of today. What does that have to do with manliness?
What about the women in the armed forces around the world who can handle these weapons?
What about the pacifist who chooses to not use weapons?
Or the man who can't handle the power of these rifles?
Are any of these more, or less, of a man because they can, can't, or choose not to use the rifles?
Seems rather silly.