Nimzabaat said:
I do enjoy the thought that all science has really told us is that the odds of all this happening by chance are astronomical, far beyond miraculous really... and there's no god.
So? If it never happened, there would be no-one here on this planet asking how we came to be here.
And the universe is big, even if the chances are really small for life to appear on any one planet, when you think of the whole universe, the chances of there being life are pretty good.
Also, 'god' isn't a scientific concept, so science really has nothing to say about it.
Theory of evolution isn't about god, it's about how evolution works, just like the theory of gravitation doesn't concern itself with theology.
Neverhoodian said:
I see no reason why God couldn't have created life on Earth through evolution over the course of billions of years. Indeed, it makes sense that a supposedly benevolent deity would subtly alter life throughout the eons so it would be able to adapt to the changing conditions of the world.
Why, though? Is your idea of god something that must stay undetected, and work in ways that cannot be detected and might just as well be random chance?
It just seems unnecessary to me, is all.
Neverhoodian said:
That's what exasperates me about the "Creation vs. Evolution" debate. Just because you believe in one doesn't mean you automatically have to throw out the other. They are not mutually exclusive ideas, unless you're one of those that interprets everything in the Bible literally.
Well, I just don't like claims made without evidence.
I don't see any reason to believe in gods, but if people believe in them, it's their business. But when they make claims, they need to provide evidence for me to take them seriously.
(And accept it tought as science for kids, for example)
There certainly are people who believe in god and accept the evolutionary theory, but their reasons for believeing in god tend to be different than their scientific views.