What other games? If you mean the other mgs game, then sorry but mgs4 was the only mgs game I played(I read the stories of each game a thousands times on Wikipedia though so I get the story).JaymesFogarty said:I agree. But wasn't that feeling the same with the other games?me and my dog said:True. It's just every time I played mgs4, and I got into a shooter situation that could have easily worked better with a stealth situation,it just feels awkward because you'd think a veteran like snake would get through that situation without violence no problem.JaymesFogarty said:It can be, but MGS4 is the exception of the stealth series where you can pretty much play it however you want. Guns blazing, or floor crawling, the player decides the genre of the game. Sorry, that was more of a rant on how realistic 4 was, then what I thought about Reach.me and my dog said:MGS4 is kinda more a stealth game than a shooter. It had shooter elements yes,but so did fallout 3 and that's not exactly classified as a shooter. Opinion.JaymesFogarty said:I think that MGS4 is the most realistic shooter I've played. A game where you have to actively regulate your psyche and stress, in relation to how hungry the character is, how hot or warm the temperature is, the level of danger, the amount of soldiers killed, etc. The reticule enlargens when you shoot as well.
That said, Halo Reach does look at least a little interesting, but I lost hope when I heard that it was a prequel. Halo didn't need a prequel at all.
I don't think I've played many realistic sci-fi shooters before. There's always a suspension in belief somewhere. That said, Pac-man is more realistic than some of the mechanics in Call of Duty. I think Reach would be far more balanced. (That said, I can't stand to play online!)
Ah, but it's not the same as playing through them though.me and my dog said:What other games? If you mean the other mgs game, then sorry but mgs4 was the only mgs game I played(I read the stories of each game a thousands times on Wikipedia though so I get the story).JaymesFogarty said:I agree. But wasn't that feeling the same with the other games?me and my dog said:True. It's just every time I played mgs4, and I got into a shooter situation that could have easily worked better with a stealth situation,it just feels awkward because you'd think a veteran like snake would get through that situation without violence no problem.JaymesFogarty said:It can be, but MGS4 is the exception of the stealth series where you can pretty much play it however you want. Guns blazing, or floor crawling, the player decides the genre of the game. Sorry, that was more of a rant on how realistic 4 was, then what I thought about Reach.me and my dog said:MGS4 is kinda more a stealth game than a shooter. It had shooter elements yes,but so did fallout 3 and that's not exactly classified as a shooter. Opinion.JaymesFogarty said:I think that MGS4 is the most realistic shooter I've played. A game where you have to actively regulate your psyche and stress, in relation to how hungry the character is, how hot or warm the temperature is, the level of danger, the amount of soldiers killed, etc. The reticule enlargens when you shoot as well.
That said, Halo Reach does look at least a little interesting, but I lost hope when I heard that it was a prequel. Halo didn't need a prequel at all.
I don't think I've played many realistic sci-fi shooters before. There's always a suspension in belief somewhere. That said, Pac-man is more realistic than some of the mechanics in Call of Duty. I think Reach would be far more balanced. (That said, I can't stand to play online!)
Clearly you've never read about the Halo universe :}JaymesFogarty said:I think that MGS4 is the most realistic shooter I've played. A game where you have to actively regulate your psyche and stress, in relation to how hungry the character is, how hot or warm the temperature is, the level of danger, the amount of soldiers killed, etc. The reticule enlargens when you shoot as well.
That said, Halo Reach does look at least a little interesting, but I lost hope when I heard that it was a prequel. Halo didn't need a prequel at all.
No. I feel that if a game's story cannot hold its' own, it doesn't deserve any kind of second media expansion. Halo: Combat Evolved was one of the most influential sci-fi shooters created. But the story for me was unforgivably shit.SextusMaximus said:Clearly you've never read about the Halo universe :}JaymesFogarty said:I think that MGS4 is the most realistic shooter I've played. A game where you have to actively regulate your psyche and stress, in relation to how hungry the character is, how hot or warm the temperature is, the level of danger, the amount of soldiers killed, etc. The reticule enlargens when you shoot as well.
That said, Halo Reach does look at least a little interesting, but I lost hope when I heard that it was a prequel. Halo didn't need a prequel at all.
Just look at a few links from the Halo Universe section. It has some huge back stories.JaymesFogarty said:No. I feel that if a game's story cannot hold its' own, it doesn't deserve any kind of second media expansion. Halo: Combat Evolved was one of the most influential sci-fi shooters created. But the story for me was unforgivably shit.SextusMaximus said:Clearly you've never read about the Halo universe :}JaymesFogarty said:I think that MGS4 is the most realistic shooter I've played. A game where you have to actively regulate your psyche and stress, in relation to how hungry the character is, how hot or warm the temperature is, the level of danger, the amount of soldiers killed, etc. The reticule enlargens when you shoot as well.
That said, Halo Reach does look at least a little interesting, but I lost hope when I heard that it was a prequel. Halo didn't need a prequel at all.