I like how you completely ignored his other two examples and focused on the only one you could have any argument against.VikingSteve said:Are you for real? Medal of Honor was a bad game to begin with, it was never good, of course Modern Warfare is better. That's like comparing a moldy sock and a dog turd, they both stink.Jakub324 said:Hell no! I grew up on a diet of Timesplitters, Medal of Honour and Crazy Taxi, and I think games like MW2 are better in every conceivable way. Nostalgia prevents progress and impedes logic, and a society without logic and progress is worth shit all.
Games today are not better. Maybe the budget is bigger, but the actual quality of games today? Absolutely flat out INFERIOR to games of the 90s.
Admittedly, the average age here is pretty young, yeah. Speaking for myself though, im a 21 year old gamer who grew up on games back in the 90s and early 00s, and I can only think of a small handful of games that i enjoyed in my childhood that I can play today and say with any honesty that they hold up anywhere near to the quality of most games released in the last 2 years. Those of us who don't suffer from the curse that is nostalgia are capable of seeing how much gaming has evolved in MANY more ways than just graphics.VikingSteve said:What's the average age of these forums? It feels like I'm talking to 14 year olds or something.
So I'm not the only sane person here. Thank GOD!lord.jeff said:No, why because we have a lot of great games right now and not just 3D shooters, spend a bit of time on steam or online and you'll find things like Cave story that do a great job of recreating that old school feel. In other words they can get the same kind of games of yesteryear plus all the great games of today.
The only games that survive in my nostalgia memory as "good games" both then and now, are the games that are good independent of their graphics, budget, etc. and are good because of gameplay, music, story, and anything else that makes a good game good.AverageJoe said:I like how you completely ignored his other two examples and focused on the only one you could have any argument against.VikingSteve said:Are you for real? Medal of Honor was a bad game to begin with, it was never good, of course Modern Warfare is better. That's like comparing a moldy sock and a dog turd, they both stink.Jakub324 said:Hell no! I grew up on a diet of Timesplitters, Medal of Honour and Crazy Taxi, and I think games like MW2 are better in every conceivable way. Nostalgia prevents progress and impedes logic, and a society without logic and progress is worth shit all.
Games today are not better. Maybe the budget is bigger, but the actual quality of games today? Absolutely flat out INFERIOR to games of the 90s.
Admittedly, the average age here is pretty young, yeah. Speaking for myself though, im a 21 year old gamer who grew up on games back in the 90s and early 00s, and I can only think of a small handful of games that i enjoyed in my childhood that I can play today and say with any honesty that they hold up anywhere near to the quality of most games released in the last 2 years. Those of us who don't suffer from the curse that is nostalgia are capable of seeing how much gaming has evolved in MANY more ways than just graphics.VikingSteve said:What's the average age of these forums? It feels like I'm talking to 14 year olds or something.