No unless they knew what they were doing they'd probably just end up destroying evidence and making it look like assault or any other crime.
I've no idea if it was even put in the papers *shrug* For all I remember, it could have been 40, not 20 years ago. If someone goes missing around here, there are lots of places to hide a body, and that's not counting all the pigs they could be fed to.AngelBlackChaos said:I want to read more about that, care to give a link/give more info? I can't seem to find anything on it.
I have never heard a verified case where this is true at all; and it sounds like something made up by news organizations on a slow news day with vague arguments for it's validity.With all the crime going on in today's society such as people attacking others purely because they are bored
If not 'tying them down' magically worked better, then that's how the police would operate. But it's not, because it isn't.The police are doing their job and 9 times out of 10 they are doing their job well, but they are tied down by the legal and justice system which is often not harsh enough on criminals.
All it would teach them, is to be better at violence. And that's exactly what they would do. Look at the aggressive approach the Mexican government took towards the Ciudad Juarez cartels. They brought in forces with unlimited powers, and all that happened is Juarez went from a relatively bad place to being the murder capitol of the world that no one has any idea how to solve. Because sending in tons of police didn't work, and escalating with military forces yielded only the result of getting more innocent people killed.look at your area and surrounding areas and I can guarantee that at least one area near you has a high crime rate. Now imagine someone was actually fighting back against crime striking fear into those that strike fear into the community.
That's not ironic at all, ironic deals with an unexpected result. Vigilantes break the law and are criminals themselves.i understand that this dark knight is still breaking the law and would have to avoid the police ironically like the criminals he/she is facing.
There are. Plenty of them. They are called vigilantes and they tend to get arrested very quickly because they are really easy to catch for a great many reasons including the fact that they are active where they live, and they have a very predictable MO.so it has me wondering why isnt there an over ambitious male or female out there who has decided to sit at home with a police radio, mask and a make-shift weapon and dish out their own brand of justice to their local area
That's the same idea behind Extraordinary Rendition, and it yields some really horrifying results.im my personal opinion i think all areas need someone like this, someone who operates outside the law but with good intentions.
Not from me they wouldn't.a dark knight would only be one person in theory but they would have the collective power of the community behind them
lol. I think your point might be better justified by pictures of female MMA fighters but this is certainly a very visual outlook.Chairman Miaow said:Fine, but you have to be the one to tell these women:Luna said:Also, realistically I couldn't see a female doing this sort of job unless they were more of a gun wielding crime stopper. Physically even a fit woman with fight experience wouldn't stand much of a chance against a reasonably sized man who's not clueless on how to fight and hasn't been stunned by surprise.
I'm sure as hell not doing it for you.![]()
![]()
![]()
Yup, he is a sane and well rounded human being and his actions have never hurt an innocent despite all the resources at his disposal and his great knowledge of forensics. -shifty eyes-Wolverine18 said:Heh... check out the TV series Dexter.Chairman Miaow said:If you went after people who were charged but released but you still believe are guilty, then you are a nutbag.
Id say with that example though, even if Batman creates worse criminals, he showing people that they dont have live in fear, that they can all become heroes and stand up to evil (Evil being a subjective term of course)DeadlyYellow said:Yep, as was the point of the Dark Knight. For every vigilante willing to push back against crime, there will be a villain able to push harder. And in the end, they're both criminals.Saladfork said:Besides, Batman isn't very good at stopping crimes anyway. Hell, he seems to create more criminals than he ever permanently stops.