Poll: Does free-will exist?

Recommended Videos

Gyrefalcon

New member
Jun 9, 2009
800
0
0
How does precognition work if there is no predetermination? Can we actually change the course of things? There was a show I caught the second half of that was about animal communication with Jane Goodall. Towards the end of the show it went into human and animal precognitive abilities with several examples that were able to be tested. Sadly, I don't know what the name of it was. I *think* it was with Animal Planet. If so, it might be "When Animals Talk, We Should Listen". If it was the BBC it might be "Animal Minds". But I thought it was called "Psychic Animals". It might have been a section of the video.

Anyway, it showed that animals such as dogs could sense when their owner was returning even if the person changed their time or pattern and did so beyond the range that a dog's normal senses should reach. Likewise they had a parrot that would say what the owner was looking at in a remote location. Are we simply acting in concert on a level we have not discovered yet, thus making specific choices based off of unconscious information that allows others to predict our actions in advance?
(If someone knows which video that is btw, let me know. I've never caught it again and only remember a few sequences from it. I'd love to see the entire thing instead of just the second half.)
 

TWRule

New member
Dec 3, 2010
465
0
0
Tallim said:
If anyone truly had free will then they wouldn't do anything ever. They would be in a perpetual state of indecisiveness. Something has to influence the decision and then it isn't a free choice but a decision based on information and experience.
You are confusing factors which potentially influence choices with those that determine them. If I see an attractive person nearby, I might have some primal urge to go jump on them. That drive is very real, but I don't necessarily act on it. I know that such things aren't socially acceptable, etc. However, it's not my knowledge of what is socially accpetable that determines what I'll do either. I can actively consider and choose between several value systems in the moment.

Even though this is practically an empty debate (since we are forced to act as though we have free will, whether we say we do or not), I believe that free will does exist. Determinism cannot explain our intuitive sensations of intelligent consciousness, freedom, responsibility, meaning, etc. A model in which humans are free agents with control over where to terminate their lines of thought, or even whether they originate entirely new inspirations/lines of thought, explains these with more consistency. A non-random choice is made in the moment by a free agent's exercise of his/her faculties, therefore the future is not pre-determined.

I cannot claim that I know this with certainty, just as a determinist cannot rightfully claim certainty with our lack of true freedom, because the evidence we currently have about the workings of the universe and the human mind is simply insufficient to do so. However, I believe free will is the more plausible theory, given the intuitive evidence. The fact that we all likely experience that same intuitive freedom, yet many in this discussion choose to ignore it is decent evidence of free will in itself, I think.
 

Tallim

New member
Mar 16, 2010
2,054
0
0
TWRule said:
Tallim said:
If anyone truly had free will then they wouldn't do anything ever. They would be in a perpetual state of indecisiveness. Something has to influence the decision and then it isn't a free choice but a decision based on information and experience.
You are confusing factors which potentially influence choices with those that determine them. If I see an attractive person nearby, I might have some primal urge to go jump on them. That drive is very real, but I don't necessarily act on it. I know that such things aren't socially acceptable, etc. However, it's not my knowledge of what is socially accpetable that determines what I'll do either. I can actively consider and choose between several value systems in the moment.

Even though this is practically an empty debate (since we are forced to act as though we have free will, whether we say we do or not), I believe that free will does exist. Determinism cannot explain our intuitive sensations of intelligent consciousness, freedom, responsibility, meaning, etc. A model in which humans are free agents with control over where to terminate their lines of thought, or even whether they originate entirely new inspirations/lines of thought, explains these with more consistency. A non-random choice is made in the moment by a free agent's exercise of his/her faculties, therefore the future is not pre-determined.

I cannot claim that I know this with certainty, just as a determinist cannot rightfully claim certainty with our lack of true freedom, because the evidence we currently have about the workings of the universe and the human mind is simply insufficient to do so. However, I believe free will is the more plausible theory, given the intuitive evidence. The fact that we all likely experience that same intuitive freedom, yet many in this discussion choose to ignore it is decent evidence of free will in itself, I think.
Hard to answer that without getting into a cyclic argument myself. Especially since it is Christmas morning.
Choosing between values systems as you put it is essentially the brain considering the best possible outcome for itself. Just because you don't know the underlying processes that go into those thoughts doesn't mean you actively chose what to do in that situation. Anything could influence that decision, mostly it's previous experience and knowledge. But it could be light levels, time of day, how much sleep you had.

I agree with you that this is a hollow debate however.
 

enriel

New member
Oct 20, 2009
187
0
0
Free Will very damn well exists. It's silly to think that everything you are ever going to do in your life has already been done and mapped out for you to follow.

No. Fuck that.
 

minemin

New member
Apr 7, 2010
13
0
0
starwarsgeek said:
minemin said:
starwarsgeek said:
minemin said:
But let's think this out a bit:do we do anything out of free will?Take for example all the little things you do in your daily life like eating and sleeping and...going to the bathroom.Do we consider those to be out of free will?If free will does exist,then we should be able to have it in every moment of our life.

That is all.
I've fasted and pulled all nighters. And we've all been in a situation where we've post-poned going to the bathroom...For example, someone goes to the theater and orders a large coke. He finds he showed up way early--the previews haven't even started. Absent-mindedly, he continues to drink it. The movies about to start, and the cup is already empty. He quickly grabs a refill and enjoys his second large coke during the movie. Near the end, he needs to go to the bathroom...but the movie is so good! Despite how uncomfortable it is, he waits through the movie and goes afterwards.

Given the right inspiration, even basic needs can be postponed, despite discomfort or pain.
Aha!But touche!You can post-pone these needs,but eventually they force you to go.If I were to give a straight answer(which in my earlier post I couldn't because of my lack of sleep):No-we don't have free will.Yes-we have the impression that we have free will.

That is all.
"You have to pee eventually! Therefore, freedom is a lie."

That's...some...umm, interesting logic there :)
Sorry.My brain failed at that one.I was writing at 03:00 because i had a bad insomnia.