It's more of a standard that you know won't be reached, but will motivate others to go beyond their limits and achieve a new level if possible.krazykidd said:Why shoot for or set a standard for something you cannot obtain ?Madara XIII said:Yes it is more of a goal or something to shoot for or even to set the standard of achievement.Lagao said:Perfectional is an ideal. Not something that can be obtained.
I don't think we're gonna come to an agreement, but it was fun to discuss this. These things are why I love the Escapist, so thanks for debating with me!Uriel-238 said:Uh, no.GeorgW said:Circle, maybe. I don't want to argue about the definition of a circle. But a perfect circle, as was requested, has to in some way involve pi, which makes it impossible. It can be computed, yes, but as of now not exactly. So once again, we could come as close to a perfect circle as is ever needed, but it won't be perfect.
A conceptual circle, such as one defined by a mathematic equation, is intrinsically perfect which is to say the distance of each point from the center is exactly the radius. The arc is consistent. The line is perfectly thin. All concentric circles would be perfectly parallel, and hence would never intersect, even as the difference in radii approached zero.
Unless you're messing with the rules, say, toying with the axioms, such as redefining perfect to equate to impossible or has to in some way involve pi, then, no.
238U.
Well, then you could say that the English alphabet is perfect because the letters: C-A-B-I-N-E-T create the resulting word: "cabinet" or that any other man-made thought construct is perfect because the sum of the parts and syntax create a result that seems logical based on our education in the subject.FoolKiller said:2 + 2 = 4. That is perfect.
In something abstract and objective like mathematics, perfection can exist.
That would only be your logic, not mine.Do4600 said:Well, then you could say that the English alphabet is perfect because the letters: C-A-B-I-N-E-T create the resulting word: "cabinet" or that any other man-made thought construct is perfect because the sum of the parts and syntax create a result that seems logical based on our education in the subject.FoolKiller said:2 + 2 = 4. That is perfect.
In something abstract and objective like mathematics, perfection can exist.
By the same logic you could conclude that associating the sun with light is perfect based on the passive experience of living on this planet.