Poll: Does the "Extended-Cut" satisfy you?

[Seanfall]

....I'm not doing this....I'm not arguing with you. Good day sir...I SAID GOOD DAY! I'm not saying your right, (your not) but I'm not doing this. I've tried it's like trying to describe color to a creature without eyes. (yes that is from ME2. )

Yes because using examples from other sci-fi series to explain how what happened may not be as as "space magicy" as people think it is makes me wrong?

I find it funny earlier you said I was in denial yet all you have done is deny examples about how said stuff isn't as flawed as you make it out to be.

the irony

yeah okay I'm an idiot, a jackass, I'm a shitty human being, your right your a genius and I'm a whiny little *****. Can you stop quoting me now.

As long as godchild is in the game I will not be satisfied. HE IS THE PLOT HOLE! You can't fix plot holes without getting rid of the little shit.

This is what the DLC will be like. Imagine hiring a hooker, only to find out that it's a transvestite. So in order to satisfy you, the dude cuts his own dick off and says "there, happy now?" It doesn't make it any better. If anything, it only creates a bigger mess and makes you doubt all future hookers.

Except nothing about the Ctalysts existence is a pothole, his motivations may be a plot hole, which they aren't, but he himself is not.

Oh god it's you....your like a none Troll version of Zeel. Your in every ME3 thread about the ending. Your not insulting people like he did. But god damn if arguing with you isn't a waste of time. Can't you just let us have our opinions and not fling the same arguments around every time?

The ending doesn't make sense. Just...accept it man.

Tells you to accept others opinions...by calling your opinion wrong.

That wasn't my intention and I'm sorry if it seemed that way. I'll stop defending my opinion as all I get for it is grief.

 

[Vault101]

I dont think it will do anything for me

I mean after looking up indoctrination theory, I actually had hope..because it just made so much sense, it turned a horrbile ending into a potentially subtle brilliant one

however I think it is too much to hope for that this new ending DLC is going to really fix anything, it doesnt disprove intoc theory...but like I said...to much to hope for

I have a feeling all it will do is add shit upon shit

but then...all we can do is take the "wait and see" aproach

 

[Vault101]

I hope they bring closure to Marauder Shields. A back story to his great struggle would be appreciated, possibly we could get a cinematic of how his family reacts to his untimely demise, to his lost cause, to his great sacrifice. Only then would this game be complete. I think it is good that the developers are finally going into depth of this wonderful core character.

he waited so long for this chance..

for the one moment where he would face Shepard....he would be the one to hold the line

but it was not just his indoctrinated need for blood...or some desire for glory

no..even though his mind was no longer his own, there was [i/]somthing[/i], a sense of some higher purpose that he could not understand, that he HAD to prevent shepard from raching the beam, for the sake of thousands of souls...out there, somwhere, on another plane of existance...it was for them that he had to make his final stand, to stop it..whatever "it" was.

but try as he might,....he was no match for shepard, as he lay dying, he heard the cries of pain, anger and confusion echoing across all of existance, he had failed them..those from some realm he couldnt unserstand..but he still hoped...there was still some small hope that whatever forces that shaped the universe would offer somthing..anything to stop the choas..and the suffering..

there was still hope...

and that is the story of marauder sheilds

 

[Lupus80]

Am I the only one that isn't even going to bother until I play Mass Effect again (which will proably be some time from now, at least until most of the DLC is out)?

If it doesn't involve gameplay or player interaction than I'll just watch it on Youtube when it's out.

Can't spoil the already spoiled.

 

[Adam Jensen_v1legacy]

snip

He said gamers want everything explained.

He did not say all gamers, he did not say X group of gamers, he said gamers, which oculd mean any sub-group and not specifically all.

He did not imply all gamers were like that and thus you being different does not make him wrong.

Oh please. This is a rather pedantic response and entirely ignores the rest of my post to point out that you didn't interpret his use of the word "gamers" to mean "all gamers" because he didn't use the world "all", when the post was quite obviously making a general comment about gamers that is an equivalent to saying "all gamers". It's the same sort of argument people who like the ending of ME3 use when they point out that the endings are different because one has red explosions, one has green explosions and one has blue explosions, ergo they are all different.

Care to try again? Maybe look at more of the points I've made, and put a bit more thought into it?

I feel like my purpose in this place is fulfilled. I have found a worthy successor who knows what logic is and how it works.