Poll: Does zero exist? - intellectual debate

Recommended Videos

SextusMaximus

Nightingale Assassin
May 20, 2009
3,508
0
0
If there was no zero, there would be no nothing - therefore 0 is simply a 'filler' for nothing, but needs to exist.

Also, all mathematical and scientific functions that start from above zero and go below it (and vice-versa) would have to be re worked out to fit zero in.

Mr. X has two pieces of chocolate in his hands, his greedy neighbour Mrs. Y - takes them both: Am I sexist? ... and How is this possible without 0?
 

Woem

New member
May 28, 2009
2,878
0
0
claymorez said:
Ekonk said:
claymorez said:
0 / 0 = n
YOU CAN'T DO THIS. NOT EVEN WITH ZERO. BIG NO-NO, SIR.
yes and my argument hinges on the fact that YOU CAN'T DO THIS because 0 doesn't exist
Then infinity also doesn't exist according to you?

Inf / Inf = Inf
Inf + n = Inf
Inf / n = Inf
Inf * n = Inf
Inf * Inf = Inf

And, depending on your limit infinity - infinity can be 0, a positive number or infinity itself.

It's not because there are exceptions to the rules that they aren't part of the rules.
 

SilentVirus

New member
Jul 23, 2009
355
0
0
Value wise, no.
But existence, yes it does. It was made to make things easier for us when 1 plus nothing came into the problem, So we made a number with no value.
 

Jubbsy

New member
Jan 1, 2010
196
0
0
Zero does exist.

Because zero is simply a term we use to describe a lack of matter or energy.
 

Orcus The Ultimate

New member
Nov 22, 2009
3,216
0
0
Idlemessiah said:
Uuurk maths. Just no.

Anyways. Of course zero exists. What happens when I eat all my eggs? There are zero left in the egg box. And besides, whats this -> 0
maybe some of them are in another dimension? or the essence of those eggs are still in the box? and you are just a dream of your brain fantasizing about eggs?

wow i went too far there...
 

Orange Monkey

New member
Mar 16, 2009
604
0
0
The fact is that even in basic mathematics we use zero as a valid number. When counting backwards you go from 1 to 0 to -1, it represents an absence, and then a substance.
 

asinann

New member
Apr 28, 2008
1,602
0
0
cobra_ky said:
asinann said:
According to my last math instructor zero is a concept, nothing more. Math existed just fine before the invention of the concept of zero. The zero just makes math easier.
so without using 0, what does 5 - 5 = ?

also isn't that pretty much true of any number?
Until the invention of the zero, it was unsolvable. It's only a concept, nothing more.
 

Cmwissy

New member
Aug 26, 2009
1,015
0
0
fluffybacon said:
lol @ putting the phrase "intellectual debate" in your thread title.
Especially when most of the replies are saying 'Ow my head hurts'

On Topic - Yes. (In concept)
 

FretfulGnome

New member
Jan 11, 2010
138
0
0
I'm just curious if you actually think that you've somehow proved the non-existence of something that extremely intelligent mathematicians have been studying for years. You must have some kind of ego on you.
 

Kyouran

New member
Jan 10, 2009
82
0
0
claymorez said:
therefore 0 / n = 0 and so 0/0 = n
I know it's been said a few dozen times already, but you cannot equate 0/n = 0 to 0/0 = n.

Here's what happens if you try to solve for n, using first your example where n = 2:

Initial problem:
1/n = 0.5
Multiply both sides by n:
(1/n) * n = 0.5 * n
Simplify:
1 = 0.5 * n
Divide both sides by 0.5:
1/0.5 = (0.5 * n) / 0.5
Simplify:
1/0.5 = n

now the problem at hand:
0/n = 0
Multiply both sides by n:
(0/n) * n = 0 * n
Simplify:
0 = 0 * n
Divide both sides by 0 (!!!!) There you have it. There's your problem.

(EDIT: Damned post button, I meant to hit preview and my finger slipped >_>)
 

Danzaivar

New member
Jul 13, 2004
1,967
0
0
By definition, 0 doesn't exist. In fact the Romans took that literally, and had no number for it. Apparently that was a massive problem for Roman builders cos they couldn't tell if the space somewhere in the building plans was just a space or if it meant 0. S'what happens when you have a number system derived philosophically I guess.

Logically however, we need to represent the concept of nothingness, and 0 does a pretty darn good job of it.
 

Insomniaku

New member
Jan 31, 2009
627
0
0
It depends on how you define existence. However if we define existence, or let alone debate existence at all, would you not agree that it exists? Does generating debate over nothing MAKE it into something as, logically, existence CAN NOT just spark out of nothingness. I think that if you measure existence in VALUE then its debatable that "0" does not exist. However it is very hard to justify measuring existence in just value (not to mention we'd have to look at how we define value now too, and how mathematical value is very different from say psychological, historical, or practical value) as existence is defined by much more than that IMO... but yeah, just going around in circles now... I've probably made an ass out of myself to some smart cookie out there who knows actually knows what they are talking about
 

Idlemessiah

Zombie Steve Irwin
Feb 22, 2009
1,050
0
0
Orcus_35 said:
Idlemessiah said:
Uuurk maths. Just no.

Anyways. Of course zero exists. What happens when I eat all my eggs? There are zero left in the egg box. And besides, whats this -> 0
maybe some of them are in another dimension? or the essence of those eggs are still in the box? and you are just a dream of your brain fantasizing about eggs?

wow i went too far there...
Hmm, that is entirely possible. I have only just woken up and all my body can think about is omelette. And I know for a fact that the 2 eggs in the fridge dimension that will soon be in my belly dimension :)