Well, the fact that you have a party in both games kind of masks the fact that the combat style and its relationship with your 'team' in each game is influenced by two different traditions. Mass Effect draws more from the tactical team based shooter genre (the only game I've played that is similar was that brilliant Star Wars clone commando shooter, but I believe there are some games with Tom Clancy slapped on the front too) where you give general commands to your friends but don't 'jump' into their body.jthm said:I'd say you make a good case for ME except for the fact that you have almost NO control over your party members, whereas in DAO you have complete control if you want it, or you can set up a list of instructions to tell them how to behave. This alone gives DAO a nudge over ME in my opinion.Spectrum_Prez said:snip
Well I think its safe to say you've won the award for most illogical reason.Naughty MrPeeps said:I have heard that Dragon Age is preferred now by many gamers. But, I still think, since it was one of the first games available on the 360, Mass Effect deserves a higher score.
Are you actually saying all fantasy is the same whereas all Sci-Fi is different? Because Mass Effect is just as cliche and overdone a setting as Dragon Age (well almost it's a very generic setting but DA:O raises the bar for genericness).SomeBritishDude said:I never feel that with Sci-Fi. With Sci-Fi anything and everything can happen, and each variation on it manages to be complete different from the other. There's miles of difference between Doctor Who and Star Trek, even though they both deal with space travel and finding new worlds. Where as the difference between Lord of the Rings and the Warhammer Universe...the differences are there, but mainly in atmosphere more than anythin else.
Sums up my feelings completely.Wardog13 said:Mass Effect, partly because I like the shooting mechanic, partly because I don't care for the style in Dragon Age, and partly because fantasy doesn't do anything for me, but future sci-fi stuff is my kind of thing.
Of coarse not, but I wouldn't say Mass Effect is anywhere near as cliche as Dragon Age.Axolotl said:Are you actually saying all fantasy is the same whereas all Sci-Fi is different? Because Mass Effect is just as cliche and overdone a setting as Dragon Age (well almost it's a very generic setting but DA:O raises the bar for genericness).SomeBritishDude said:I never feel that with Sci-Fi. With Sci-Fi anything and everything can happen, and each variation on it manages to be complete different from the other. There's miles of difference between Doctor Who and Star Trek, even though they both deal with space travel and finding new worlds. Where as the difference between Lord of the Rings and the Warhammer Universe...the differences are there, but mainly in atmosphere more than anythin else.
It is. Granted it draws primarily on cliches that haven't been used in a while now but it's just as much of a generic Sci-Fi as Dragon Age is generic fantasy.SomeBritishDude said:Of coarse not, but I wouldn't say Mass Effect is anywhere near as cliche as Dragon Age.