Does it really matter who had the language first?Sparrow Tag said:Smart.Kiutu said:Neither. I have enough faith I spelled things correctly. I make mistakes, but it looks nice enough that errors are not usually noticed.
And I hate the english style because advocates of it seem to have a prickness about them.
Being proud and all is fine, but to act like you are better for adding a pointless u makes you come off as one of our Republican 'patriots' who freak cause Obama did not wear a flag pin.
No sorry, I'm mixing up smart and "That really wasn't smart".
"I hate a language because those people hate the way I do it" is quite possibly THE WORST excuse ever. Atleast British people have the right to say that they had it first. Honestly, there is no way the UK can't be in the right.
Oh? Glad to hear it. I read somewhere that it was generally accepted though, so I guess I just rolled with it. I'm glad to know it isn't so.Xanadu84 said:In America, "Thru" is really just a bastardized spelling, as in, "Drive Thru" like Nestles, "Qwik". It has no place in proper American English either.SultanP said:Well, being from neither Britain nor USA, I get to choose whichever I want, and I mostly go with British. Mostly because I prefer that way of spelling words, but also because I die a little inside every time someone writes thru. It reminds me too much of people writing "u" instead of "you", which should be a criminal offence if I had anything to say about it.
Lemme guess, your one of the people that think American Football rightly deserves the name Football. Newsflash, England called "Soccer", Football first.crypt-creature said:Does it really matter who had the language first?Sparrow Tag said:Smart.Kiutu said:Neither. I have enough faith I spelled things correctly. I make mistakes, but it looks nice enough that errors are not usually noticed.
And I hate the english style because advocates of it seem to have a prickness about them.
Being proud and all is fine, but to act like you are better for adding a pointless u makes you come off as one of our Republican 'patriots' who freak cause Obama did not wear a flag pin.
No sorry, I'm mixing up smart and "That really wasn't smart".
"I hate a language because those people hate the way I do it" is quite possibly THE WORST excuse ever. Atleast British people have the right to say that they had it first. Honestly, there is no way the UK can't be in the right.
The people who came to North America were British, or mostly British, and was their basis for any language(s) they were going to further adopt into their own. Just because the American language has changed over the years doesn't mean they don't have any more right to the British english language than those people that live in Britain. The British english language has changed just as much as the American english language due to location and influences, neither culture has a 'right' to claim a base language that was more than likely an offshoot of another culture and changed due to location and other influences.
Being 'first' doesn't mean something is right, since you are talking about two completely different cultures now.
Ive also talked with Americans who hate what there country is doing, and express patriotism for other countries, and Ive known British people who automatically dismiss anything that dares come across as, "American". Basically what it comes down to is that people tend to take having pride in a sense of community through your opinion and identification with countries, and turn it into a means of lableing certain people, "Others". That's almost always bad.blarggles said:I think you have just touched on another topic there.Sparrow Tag said:Smart.Kiutu said:Neither. I have enough faith I spelled things correctly. I make mistakes, but it looks nice enough that errors are not usually noticed.
And I hate the english style because advocates of it seem to have a prickness about them.
Being proud and all is fine, but to act like you are better for adding a pointless u makes you come off as one of our Republican 'patriots' who freak cause Obama did not wear a flag pin.
No sorry, I'm mixing up smart and "That really wasn't smart".
"I hate a language because those people hate the way I do it" is quite possibly THE WORST excuse ever. Atleast British people have the right to say that they had it first. Honestly, there is no way the UK can't be in the right.
Something I have noticed with some of my American friends. They think it is perfectly acceptable to be patriotic to there country. However, not ok for me to be Patriotic about the UK around them. Otherwise, I am trying to show I am superior. Or some other clap trap they come out with. Basically boils down to one rule for them, another for everyone else when it comes to showing support of your country. Maybe it is just the American's I have met but this has happened a fair few times now.
I was working on the theory that he didn't know accents the heavy britolian accent is hilariously awful so it would be fun if he got one!DannyBarnes said:nooo definitely wants a scouse accent, its better than anyone else's!!!murphy7801 said:Nah he wants a heavy Bristol accent!thepj said:what kind of british accent? southern? northern? brummy? scouse (spelling please)? jordy (spellin again)? there are tons of brithish accentsMacgyvercas said:: [small] I wish I had a British accent [/small]
ahhh i see your point now hahamurphy7801 said:I was working on the theory that he didn't know accents the heavy britolian accent is hilariously awful so it would be fun if he got one!DannyBarnes said:nooo definitely wants a scouse accent, its better than anyone else's!!!murphy7801 said:Nah he wants a heavy Bristol accent!thepj said:what kind of british accent? southern? northern? brummy? scouse (spelling please)? jordy (spellin again)? there are tons of brithish accentsMacgyvercas said:: [small] I wish I had a British accent [/small]
Those damn Sumerians have us all beat! Therefore none of us are right.Sparrow Tag said:Lemme guess, your one of the people that think American Football rightly deserves the name Football. Newsflash, England called "Soccer", Football first.crypt-creature said:Does it really matter who had the language first?Sparrow Tag said:Smart.Kiutu said:Neither. I have enough faith I spelled things correctly. I make mistakes, but it looks nice enough that errors are not usually noticed.
And I hate the english style because advocates of it seem to have a prickness about them.
Being proud and all is fine, but to act like you are better for adding a pointless u makes you come off as one of our Republican 'patriots' who freak cause Obama did not wear a flag pin.
No sorry, I'm mixing up smart and "That really wasn't smart".
"I hate a language because those people hate the way I do it" is quite possibly THE WORST excuse ever. Atleast British people have the right to say that they had it first. Honestly, there is no way the UK can't be in the right.
The people who came to North America were British, or mostly British, and was their basis for any language(s) they were going to further adopt into their own. Just because the American language has changed over the years doesn't mean they don't have any more right to the British english language than those people that live in Britain. The British english language has changed just as much as the American english language due to location and influences, neither culture has a 'right' to claim a base language that was more than likely an offshoot of another culture and changed due to location and other influences.
Being 'first' doesn't mean something is right, since you are talking about two completely different cultures now.
And yes, being first does give you an advantage. Look at it this way. You manage to find out how to make a working teleporter. Your friend looks at your plans, and sells it to a company.
Who's in the right? The guy that was FIRST or the SECOND guy that stole the plans?
That's funny... I agree that "favor" looks like it should be pronounced "fah-vor", but to me "favour" looks like it should be pronounced "fa-voor", similar to the pronunciation of "velour".DuplicateValue said:But surely the English makes more sense?Vuljatar said:Depends on the word, usually I go with the American spelling because the English spelling for a lot of things just looks stupid.
I mean, the American spelling of "favour" is "favor". To me that looks like it should be pronounced 'FAH-VOHR' or something. The 'u' is what changes the sound of the last syllable.
wow...ask a question to get the name right and you start an international incident. Apologies to any citizen of Wales or (i hope I get this right) The Republic of Ireland if I insulted your national identity. Please ignore the silly American who likes to use generalizations to try and grasp the basic principles. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go listen to some U2.Lukeje said:Sir Toaster said:PRINCIPALITYMr Orange said:English, and I hate the term "British English". It's just English, and then there are other dialects, like American, Australian and Canadian.
You "know" this? Do you "know" something about Wales that others don't? Because I'm pretty sure it's part of Great Britain and the UK.tirone231 said:Quick question to any British people reading this: Does it matter if we call your country England, Great Britain, or the United Kingdom? I know that G.B. technically refers to England and Scotland, and U.K. refers to England, Scotland, and Ireland, but since they have been used interchangably (especially in America), should one be used over the others?...i.e. it is a separate country, and the title is just something we humour the Royals with.Wikipedia said:Llywelyn the Great founded the Principality of Wales in 1216. Just over a hundred years after the Edwardian Conquest, Owain Glyndŵr briefly restored independence in the early 15th century, to what was to become modern Wales. Traditionally the British Royal Family have bestowed the courtesy title of 'Prince of Wales' upon the heir apparent of the reigning monarch. Wales is sometimes referred to as the 'Principality of Wales', or just the 'principality', although this has no modern geographical or constitutional basis.
Thanks, I read the Topic title wrong.NeutralDrow said:So...three categories of answers here:
"I use English spelling because it's what I grew up with."
"I use American spelling because it's what I grew up with."
"I use English spelling because I fit the British stereotype for pompous jackassery."
Just like last time. God damn, I hate it when I'm right, sometimes...
Of course not. It's English. "American" is just a large collection of dialects of the people living within the United States. Just like there is no "British" language, because the dialect changes every time you cross a river.Woodsey said:Surely 'American' doesn't count as a language?
Firstly, you guessed wrong. I don't care what you call American football because it's just a freaking game, and I'm quite aware of where the term came from. Thank you for trying to be smug about it and failing.Sparrow Tag said:Lemme guess, your one of the people that think American Football rightly deserves the name Football. Newsflash, England called "Soccer", Football first.crypt-creature said:Does it really matter who had the language first?Sparrow Tag said:Smart.Kiutu said:Neither. I have enough faith I spelled things correctly. I make mistakes, but it looks nice enough that errors are not usually noticed.
And I hate the english style because advocates of it seem to have a prickness about them.
Being proud and all is fine, but to act like you are better for adding a pointless u makes you come off as one of our Republican 'patriots' who freak cause Obama did not wear a flag pin.
No sorry, I'm mixing up smart and "That really wasn't smart".
"I hate a language because those people hate the way I do it" is quite possibly THE WORST excuse ever. Atleast British people have the right to say that they had it first. Honestly, there is no way the UK can't be in the right.
The people who came to North America were British, or mostly British, and was their basis for any language(s) they were going to further adopt into their own. Just because the American language has changed over the years doesn't mean they don't have any more right to the British english language than those people that live in Britain. The British english language has changed just as much as the American english language due to location and influences, neither culture has a 'right' to claim a base language that was more than likely an offshoot of another culture and changed due to location and other influences.
Being 'first' doesn't mean something is right, since you are talking about two completely different cultures now.
And yes, being first does give you an advantage. Look at it this way. You manage to find out how to make a working teleporter. Your friend looks at your plans, and sells it to a company.
Who's in the right? The guy that was FIRST or the SECOND guy that stole the plans?
Figures. I mean, your not going to make yourself look even MORE of a prat are you?crypt-creature said:Firstly, you guessed wrong. I don't care what you call American football because it's just a freaking game, and I'm quite aware of where the term came from. Thank you for trying to be smug about it and failing.
Secondly, cultures all over the world use the same word and a vast majority of them have slightly different meanings. That's how culture works, no one culture has any right to say 'your wrong' since cultures borrow terms and words all the time.
Secondly, that is rather far from comparing American english to British english have any connection.
Here's a better comparison. You and your friend find a way to crate a working teleporter, only you disagree on some things during the final stages of its creation. So, you decide to call it quits as a team, maybe one of you tells the other their out of the project, whatever, but both of you go off to do your own thing when it comes to the final production of the item.
You both complete your teleporters, and while they have similarities they are also different from each other.
No one is 'in the right' to claim the teleporter since they both had a say in its original design, they just came out differently.
The first 'Americans' didn't steal the British language because they were British to begin with, they didn't steal anything from the british aside from their independence because, again, they were inherently British to begin with and that is the dialect they were taught. This isn't a pissing contest since the very fist dialect of English doubtedly sounded and read exactly like the current British version of English or the American version of English. Languages change over time, including the British version of english, and every culture has subcultures that pronounce their 'original' words differently. This is the way of languages and cultures, no one has a 'right' to anything.
American english is changing enough that it should be recognized as American, not American english.
What evidence do you have aside from 'Yar, they stole or language because the British made the language first!'Sparrow Tag said:Figures. I mean, your not going to make yourself look even MORE of a prat are you?
Anyway, you have no evidence other than "This is how cultures work, ya da ya da". You didn't even bother to include a cool decision making task like me.
Shame on you.