Poll: Ex-marine shot at 70 times hit atleast 60 bleeds out because SWAT team wouldn't let paramedic's in

Recommended Videos

DSK-

New member
May 13, 2010
2,431
0
0
I'm going to quote Lazlow: "If people had more guns there'd be less shootings...".
 

A_who

New member
Sep 17, 2010
64
0
0
I am a little disappointed in the SWAT team.I think they could of done better than 85% accuracy.
 

Saelune

Trump put kids in cages!
Legacy
Mar 8, 2011
8,411
16
23
SWAT...for MARIFUCKINGJUANA!!!!
The police are 100% wrong for this. I try not to take such sides, but sheesh. This was just a big mess of stupid.
 

Grey_Focks

New member
Jan 12, 2010
1,969
0
0
jumjalalabash said:
Am I wrong for assuming SWAT generally used non-lethal weapons? Also you think that the police doing such a large operation to so many homes they would do a bit of research or something first.
Unfortunately, no. SWAT aren't usually brought in to arrest people, they conduct raids, and they take out hostile targets. That's it.

The whole case sounds fishy, and as someone who knows a few marines, I'm just gonna say it, I bet those SWAT guys fucked the pooch hard core, and then lied about what happened to cover their asses. Seriously people, actually read the article before you go siding with the SWAT team. And yea, this whole thing could have been averted with non-lethal weapons.

Seriously, this is just disgusting, because as others have said, any non-criminal who heard people breaking into their house wouldn't think "oh shit cops", they would think "holy shit burglars, I need to protect my family". Which is probably what he did, and he got killed for it. The cops are to blame 100% for this, and I REALLY hope they don't get away with it. How many times have they changed their story?

.....I am now depressed. Thank you for bringing this depressing news to my attention, OP, you jerk.
 

xPixelatedx

New member
Jan 19, 2011
1,316
0
0
So let me get this straight.

In America most people defend the right to own a gun; most say it's for defense against crime. The police have to support this since if someone legitly gets a gun, they have the legal right to have it in their house. But in this same country cops bang down your doors and scream things while waving guns at you - basically acting like the criminals you are trying to defend yourself against - and if you happen to be holding that gun the law says you can own, without evaluating the situation what so ever the police will murder you.

What an amazing system.
 

Craorach

New member
Jan 17, 2011
749
0
0
When all is said and done... the absurdity of this situation starts at the very reason they were there.

Heavily armed SWAT team doing a "no knock" raid on a residential home where they do not even know who is inside.... for weed.
 

BlackIvory

New member
May 2, 2011
122
0
0
Cripes this is terrible. The police realy f'ed up on this one bad. Really? all that SWAT and high profile agression on a bloody marijuhana bust? not even the dangerous stuff like cocain or heroin or crud like that, but the drug that makes you see rainbows?

And the nerve of the SWAT not letting paramedics in, wth?! it may have been useless in the end seeins as they bloody shot him 60 times, but still....Jeez....and they call us brutes and savages....

Kopikatsu said:
Stun him...with what? He was at the end of a long, dark hallway and armed with a rifle. Besides, SWAT doesn't generally carry non-lethal weaponry. Also, not only do tazers have ridiculously shitty range, they don't work half the time because the prog doesn't reach the skin or a malfunction, or...well..there are a ton of reasons that tazers are never a good choice.
Ever heard of rubber bullets? they stun perfectly without killing, trust me. Or tear gas or flash grenades to blind. PLENTY of non-leathal disabling options out there
 

MattyDienhoff

New member
Jan 3, 2008
342
0
0
Craorach said:
When all is said and done... the absurdity of this situation starts at the very reason they were there.

Heavily armed SWAT team doing a "no knock" raid on a residential home where they do not even know who is inside.... for weed.
Exactly this. It never should have happened in the first place.
 

Bobbity

New member
Mar 17, 2010
1,659
0
0
This is fucked up.

I don't think that I could convey my emotions upon reading this any more than that.
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,836
0
0
Oh you Americans and your weapons. Over here people are cautious about carrying airsoft pistols around in public.

*reads into it further*

What this is, I don't even...
 

Bags159

New member
Mar 11, 2011
1,250
0
0
If he had sixty bullet holes in him I don't think any number of paramedics was going to made any difference.
 

Ericb

New member
Sep 26, 2006
368
0
0
emeraldrafael said:
Its always morbidly funny (to me at least) when a military vet dies unfairly in the country he just fought for. I know this is terrible, and yes it is terrible, but I dont know, thats just what I think.
You're talking about irony. An that's one hell of an example of it.

Baneat said:
No-Knock warrants should not be possible because of this. You put people in the situation where they're justified in defending themselves and this shit happens.
I will look into this type of warrant before I comment, but at the moment I can't help but feel the same way.
 

thepyrethatburns

New member
Sep 22, 2010
454
0
0
Is now a good time to mention the Indiana State Supreme Court ruling which effectively negates you having any option to deny the police coming into your home even if it is an illegal entry?
 

twistedmic

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 8, 2009
2,542
210
68
To everyone that's commenting on the fact that the former marine's safety was, the SWAT team did not, and could not know that. They just saw someone holding an assault rifle while in a house suspected of holding drugs and drug traffickers. The former marine may have even been holding the rifle in a threatening manner (i.e. like he was about to fire). And it's doubtful that anyone in law enforcement would deliberately let the suspect/assailant fire first or make the first aggressive move if they could prevent it.

As for the wife and kids being in the house, I'm pretty sure that drug traffickers sometimes have families that they live with, or hold their shipments in the same house as their families. It might even be a better way for them to hide their drug shipments.

I think that the SWAT team legitimately believed that they were in danger when they opened fire, and that they shouldn't get in trouble for the shooting (beyond anything that comes from accidental shootings). But I don't see why they denied medical help, unless it was due to protocol.
 

Trolldor

New member
Jan 20, 2011
1,849
0
0
Because people seem to completely miss the problem repeatedly I'll say it here - stop giving the public easy access to firearms, stop being so hostile towards police.
The trouble rests with those who issue the orders, who make the laws, who establish the guidelines and rules that those lower in the chain have to abide by.
It doesn't help that the police get firebombed when responding to noise complaints, and that bogan hicks keep telling their children to disrespect the 'pigs'.
Nevermind all those rapists, murderers and thieves, all the child molesters and slave traffickers they capture. Nevermind those hostages they save. They're only in it for the power, right?
 

Trolldor

New member
Jan 20, 2011
1,849
0
0
BlackIvory said:
Cripes this is terrible. The police realy f'ed up on this one bad. Really? all that SWAT and high profile agression on a bloody marijuhana bust? not even the dangerous stuff like cocain or heroin or crud like that, but the drug that makes you see rainbows?

And the nerve of the SWAT not letting paramedics in, wth?! it may have been useless in the end seeins as they bloody shot him 60 times, but still....Jeez....and they call us brutes and savages....

Kopikatsu said:
Stun him...with what? He was at the end of a long, dark hallway and armed with a rifle. Besides, SWAT doesn't generally carry non-lethal weaponry. Also, not only do tazers have ridiculously shitty range, they don't work half the time because the prog doesn't reach the skin or a malfunction, or...well..there are a ton of reasons that tazers are never a good choice.
Ever heard of rubber bullets? they stun perfectly without killing, trust me. Or tear gas or flash grenades to blind. PLENTY of non-leathal disabling options out there
Oh! Back seat tactician everybody!

Go on, tell us how a fully trained SWAT team should act based on your experience with counter-strike and watching movies.
 

Kakashi on crack

New member
Aug 5, 2009
983
0
0
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
This is why I don't like america's police system. Don't they have to show you a warrent to get into your damned house? Don't they have to pronouce themselves as Police? I mean if someone just randomly bashed into my house, I'd blow them away, Cops, Robbers, Fourign Invaders, anyone.

Did the guy even fire his gun?

Don't they have to fire at you first in War with that Jeneva convintion crap? Does this apply to police?

And think, THIS WAS BECAUSE OF SUSPECTED WEED TRAFFICING. I could understand Cocain, but Majiuana? I disagree with using it, but still, they took that a little far.

I hope all of those cops lose there jobs, or better yet, lets redo the entire police system (Atleast for my city, because we've got a lot of problems) Get guys from the military at street corners, your not likely to trafic drugs if there is a guy with an assault rifle at every turn.
Police aren't required to pronounce themselves if they get a no-knock warrant, but they have to have pretty damned good evidence to file one of those. All they had was a knock-warrant FOUR DAYS after they raided the place. By law they don't really have to announce themselves as police until you are within eye-contact, and even then they aren't required to say it if they are afraid for their lives.

The guy couldn't have fired his gun, he had gun safety on, which the polcie SHOULD have had on their own guns.

Police do not need to wait to be fired on if they beleive their life is in danger, but ONLY if they see a weapon. (that's why they have a fucking tazer)

He was suspected of wearing a police uniform to break into people's homes and steal things such as illegal drugs. Most likely a cover-up story.

This whole situation is a big fuck-up by unorganized and irrationally thinking police officers who with even a couple seconds worth of rational thought could have prevented this whole fucking situation. It's things like this that piss me off and make me question how the good cops manage to stay in the system when so many corrupt ones ruin their name.
 

BlackIvory

New member
May 2, 2011
122
0
0
Trolldor said:
Oh! Back seat tactician everybody!

Go on, tell us how a fully trained SWAT team should act based on your experience with counter-strike and watching movies.
I live in Israel, I was 3 years in the army, I'm a combat medic and I had friends with more training and sense in their trigger finger then all those SWAT cops. Trust me when I say hostile situations are NOT something unfamiliar here, I may not be a master "tactician" but what I said is still perfectly valid.
 

Ravnican

New member
Jul 19, 2010
114
0
0
Yikes, good thing I don't live in the United States, I don't want to have to worry about being shot by the police in my own home. In Argentina, instead, you have to worry about being robbed by your government on a daily basis, getting beaten to death in a dance club or shot in the street because you happened to have a modern cellphone... wait.
 

Baneat

New member
Jul 18, 2008
2,762
0
0
BlackIvory said:
Trolldor said:
Oh! Back seat tactician everybody!

Go on, tell us how a fully trained SWAT team should act based on your experience with counter-strike and watching movies.
I live in Israel, I was 3 years in the army, I'm a combat medic and I had friends with more training and sense in their trigger finger then all those SWAT cops. Trust me when I say hostile situations are NOT something unfamiliar here, I may not be a master "tactician" but what I said is still perfectly valid.
I just doubt a rubber bullet would put someone down(and out) faster than they can pull a trigger. The fastest way is probably to use real bullets, which reduces the danger to the team.

I think the SWAT have done nothing wrong, they're following a set of codes and an order, and you will not be in the SWAT for long if you start to use your own rationalisations in lieu of what you're told to do.

The blame lies on the man who told them to go in with a no-knock warrant armed.