Poll: Fallout 3, New Vegas, or Oblivion?

[A random person]

I played a little bit of Oblivion, and honestly, it kinda bored me. I somewhat enjoyed Fallout 3, but I'd go with New Vegas by a pretty wide margin here.

 

[Jaranja]

Fallout 3 is 10x better than Fallout: NV. I pretty much agree with everything Spectrum said and there's no storyline to follow. Alright, that's good in some ways but, with a game like Fallout, I prefer to have a rough line on what I should be doing instead of just throwing me into a fire.

Don't get me started on the actual portrayal of Vegas. What a bloody shambles that place is.

 

[Jaranja]

Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?

Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?

this

Because that is not the question the OP wanted to ask?

It's simple, really. You didn't need to ask the question, you trolls.

 

[Random Fella]

Definitely fallout 3, the game may be less in the scoping in (iron-sights) but it has better story line, gameplay and the graphics were no different than New vegas. Oblivion was good with the magic and swords but not as good as fallout. Well that's my opinion anyway

 

[Jaranja]

Fallout 3 is 10x better than Fallout: NV. I pretty much agree with everything Spectrum said and there's no storyline to follow. Alright, that's good in some ways but, with a game like Fallout, I prefer to have a rough line on what I should be doing instead of just throwing me into a fire.

Don't get me started on the actual portrayal of Vegas. What a bloody shambles that place is.

oh yes because we all know that things that get hit with a nuclear bomb still look good after they have been hit. in fact they look better. >.>

Even that. There wasn't anything appealing about the area. Anyway, a bomb didn't hit Vegas, the radiation spread to it.

 

[robodukky]

I have just played Oblivion for about six hours, and about five yesterday. I have to say that in the three options, the short time I played Fallout NV beats the time playing Oblivion by far but not by too far compared to Fallout 3.

 

[Imbechile]

Fallout New vegas. IMO it's MUCH better than Oblivion and F3

 

[Brutal Peanut]

*hops from foot to foot* Oh geez, but I like all three of them so much.

DON'T MAKE ME CHOOSE!
[small]but[/small]

Fallout 3 > Oblivion > New Vegas

 

[Jaranja]

Fallout 3 is 10x better than Fallout: NV. I pretty much agree with everything Spectrum said and there's no storyline to follow. Alright, that's good in some ways but, with a game like Fallout, I prefer to have a rough line on what I should be doing instead of just throwing me into a fire.

Don't get me started on the actual portrayal of Vegas. What a bloody shambles that place is.

oh yes because we all know that things that get hit with a nuclear bomb still look good after they have been hit. in fact they look better. >.>

Even that. There wasn't anything appealing about the area. Anyway, a bomb didn't hit Vegas, the radiation spread to it.

You seem to forget that the New Vegas area was looted for 200 years, and hastily constructed before the game takes place. You also forget the oligarchy that Mr. House started has made the surrounding areas into shit hole slums. Its the same level layout as the previous fallout games. Feel awkward? well good it should. Look at startopia. New technology merged with old pre-war tech doesn't look too good.

I didn't play the previous Fallout games. I'm just saying it as I saw in Fallout: New Vegas. It's a very uninteresting place. Then again, most of the Mojave is.

I felt a sense of wonder whenever I stumbled across a building in Fallout 3, whereas, when ever I stumble across a camp or one of the copy-pasted shacks, I just sigh and loot the bugger.

 

[Fragged_Templar]

Fallout: New Vegas, for the simple reason that so far its the closest to actually being funny... like Fallout 2, which is the best in the series bugs and glitches included!

 

[WhiteandNeardy99]

Whilst I dearly love all three of these games for me personally it always has to be Oblivion, the amount of times I've played that game and re-played that game and continue to re-play that game just makes it the best to me. The sheer amout of playability in it I think makes it the best and I've always preferred the oldy worldy fantasy setting and environment as opposed to the post-apocolyptic wasteland settings, also I've encounter 'almost' no bugs in Oblivion, well certainly not game spoiling bugs at any rate. Don't get me wrong the other two are both fantastic games, however Oblivion first everytime for me.

 

[Srdjan]

New Vegas, it's patched now, it's perfect.

 

[Keall]

Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?

Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?

this

Because that is not the question the OP wanted to ask?

It's simple, really. You didn't need to ask the question, you trolls.

The point being, if you're going to choose 2 games from one series, and the last game of another series, none of which were anywhere near as good as the previous games in those series, you should probably include the games that were actually really, really good. Fallout 1 and 2 were great games. Morrowind was an awesome game. Oblivion was good, Fallout 3 was disappointing to the point where I refuse to play NV.

I fail to see how this makes me a troll.

 

[SuperCombustion]

If it was for a console, I'd pick Fallout NV for its gameplay, plot and playtime. PC however, I'd go for Oblivion purely because of the resource in it lets you mod it's brains out.

 

[Jaranja]

Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?

Why is this not Fallout 1, Fallout 2 or Morrowind?

this

Because that is not the question the OP wanted to ask?

It's simple, really. You didn't need to ask the question, you trolls.

The point being, if you're going to choose 2 games from one series, and the last game of another series, none of which were anywhere near as good as the previous games in those series, you should probably include the games that were actually really, really good. Fallout 1 and 2 were great games. Morrowind was an awesome game. Oblivion was good, Fallout 3 was disappointing to the point where I refuse to play NV.

I fail to see how this makes me a troll.

Because your way of thinking is completely different the the OP's. Maybe he didn't play the games you mentioned. He's asking that question, you can't say that he should be asking a completely different question that would yield completely different answers. Just shush.