Poll: Fallout 3 or New Vegas, what would you rather play?

Recommended Videos

Mooko12

New member
Apr 17, 2010
78
0
0
Fallout 3

I say this because the quests just were so much more interesting and thought out than New Vegas. Sure NV had about four times as many as 3 but Fallout 3's just had this feel to them that I fell in love with. Also most locations felt very unique compared to NV. I felt the setting was superior and the characters to be more interesting. One thing I have to give to New Vegas is it's ending, it felt more satisfying then Fallout 3's even with Broken Steel.
 

CheckD3

New member
Dec 9, 2009
1,181
0
0
It's hard, because both were great. I liked in NV that the combat felt stonger in real time, and you didn't need to use Vats in EVERY fight, but NV's feel is more upbeat, while at the same time being somber.

I would say FO3, only because the world felt, more different and explorey...both were great, and there are things in NV I like more, like how the quests are stronger, the weapons more vast and such, plus the addition of Hardcore mode when I get off Halo Reach and start back up on Vegas, but 3 gave me a strong feel of a Fallout, the world litered with bandits and trash, scary and hopeless, and everything I did, it all felt...almost pointless, like I was delaying my inevitable death
 

Captain Pirate

New member
Nov 18, 2009
1,875
0
0
MiracleOfSound said:
Fallout 3 - by far.

There are no huge, detailed interiors like Nuka Cola Plant, Capital Building, Red Racer Factory, Springvale Elementary, Roosevelt Academy, The museums of History and Tech, National Archives, LOB Industries, Hubris comics... this was my favorite part of fallout 3 and all we have in New Vegas are a few vaults, 4 Casinos, Repcomm and an empty sewer
This, totally this.

Don't get me wrong, I think F:NV is great, and I'm loving the hell out of it, but there just aren't anywhere near as many places to explore.
Fallout 3 was filled with, as MiracleOfSound said, huge, detailed interiors, both above ground (Things like Hubris Comics and the Nuka Cola Plant), and below ground (The Vaults, County Sewer Mainline and all the Train tunnels).

New Vegas has some large buldings; but they aren't nearly as well detailed. FO3 had details, collectables, interesting things and more around every corner. F:NV has... a few Filing Cabinets with random loot.
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,776
0
0
Captain Pirate said:
This, totally this.

Don't get me wrong, I think F:NV is great, and I'm loving the hell out of it, but there just aren't anywhere near as many places to explore.
Fallout 3 was filled with, as MiracleOfSound said, huge, detailed interiors, both above ground (Things like Hubris Comics and the Nuka Cola Plant), and below ground (The Vaults, County Sewer Mainline and all the Train tunnels).

New Vegas has some large buldings; but they aren't nearly as well detailed. FO3 had details, collectables, interesting things and more around every corner. F:NV has... a few Filing Cabinets with random loot.
I'm pleasantly surprised by how many people feel the same way I do about this. Fallout 3 for me was a much more mysterious and magical place to explore than the Mojave.

In fact, exploring the Mojave almost made me wish for a nuclear winter.
 

Jandau

Smug Platypus
Dec 19, 2008
5,034
0
0
Not sure...

New Vegas is a better game with better writing and such, but I liked the Capital Wasteland more than the Mojave Desert...
 

BlackHazard

New member
Nov 6, 2008
140
0
0
New Vegas

Igot bored in fallout 3 so fast I couldn't bring myself to finish it but with new vegas I was more entertained.
And you could do all the endings without restarting and thats a huge time saver.
 

BlackHazard

New member
Nov 6, 2008
140
0
0
New Vegas

I got bored in fallout 3 so fast I couldn't bring myself to finish it but with new vegas I was more entertained.
And you could do all the endings without restarting and thats a huge time saver.
 

Dizzle26

New member
Jan 15, 2011
85
0
0
Fallout 3 for the simple fact that it was on the east coast. Since Fallout 1 (never played Tactics) we've only seen the effect of the Great War on the west coast. As a east-coast native, I thought it was kinda cool to see it from that perspective. The abundance of Super Mutants and the handful of Behemoths made for some intense fights, (how one of those big buggers can sneak up on you is beyond me) and the raiders thrown in was just awesome. Add in the DLC and you've got a heck of a lot of fun. In my opinion.

Not to say NV was bad. I like both games, but FO3 owns me body and soul. :3
 

Amphoteric

New member
Jun 8, 2010
1,276
0
0
I enjoyed Fallout 3 more, New Vegas gameplay was just too similar although it was a better game.
 

Nannernade

New member
May 18, 2009
1,233
0
0
Fallout 3 by far, I mean Fallout New Vegas is a good game but from Fallout 3 to New Vegas the meaning of free roaming was completely lost, and with F3 the building were more than just go here now go here what you want to explore? Too bad.

The buildings were much bigger and worth the exploration even the DLC's were great.
 

bobdonkey

New member
Jan 21, 2011
35
0
0
New Vegas. It was a little wobbly at the beginning and it's way too glitchy, but on the whole I find it much more Fallout-y. Plus the story and general dialogue is a lot more deep and interesting, and the avenues available to you are more varied and fun.
 

MaxP779

New member
Jan 21, 2011
78
0
0
Fallout 3, they were both great but i just felt fallout 3 was a larger game with more places to go. The subways and underground places are my kinda thing as well, shame vegas dosent have a subway.
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,063
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
GonzoGamer said:
Ultratwinkie said:
GonzoGamer said:
Ultratwinkie said:
GonzoGamer said:
MiracleOfSound said:
Fallout 3 - by far.

(the following is a rant I made elsewhere a while back)

I've been playing New Vegas a lot and now have 2 and a half playthroughs done, about 100 hours in total. After this short amount of time, I feel like I've seen everything the game has to offer. Most map markers are hugely disappointing, consisting of shacks with nothing but an empty bottle, a campfire on a hill, an airport terminal with nothing but two cases of caps and some radscorpions, a few caves with not a single piece of loot or backstory in them... it feels so empty compared to the Capital Wasteland which had something new, unique and interesting over every hill.

There are no huge, detailed interiors like Nuka Cola Plant, Capital Building, Red Racer Factory, Springvale Elementary, Roosevelt Academy, The museums of History and Tech, National Archives, LOB Industries, Hubris comics... this was my favorite part of fallout 3 and all we have in New Vegas are a few vaults, 4 Casinos, Repcomm and an empty sewer

And then there's the atmosphere... Fallout 3 was haunting, beautiful and soulful. Standing on a ruined flyover watching the sun set over the burnt out forests and ruined Washington monument was just sublime. Nothing in Vegas gave me that same feeling or immersed me in its atmosphere like f3 did at any given moment. Just sand, sand, red rocks and more sand.
I had this complaint above as well. On top of that, Fallout 3 actually worked... Until goty that is.
Also another thing that immersed me in Fallout 3 were the (unique ones especially) random encounters. They gave me the feeling of it being a living breathing world. Fallout NV had a couple at the beginning but other than that the only spontaneous interactions were random beast attacks. Nobody I saved before came by to give me a mininuke, no kid stopped me to ask for help finding his father, not even random slavers escorting their catches. The world of NV felt more dead and contrived.

While the capital wasteland felt like a real place, the mojave wasteland felt like a movie studio backlot.
The biggest disappointment however was how glitchy it was. I expect a normal (Fallout 3) amount, but this one started getting really absurdly shoddy near the end.
You do realize that civilization destroyed the "breathing" in fallout 3 right? Slavery was decimated by NCR presence, Raider promptly slaughtered, and rebuilding of critical rail and military structures. The wasteland isn't ruled by raider tribes anymore, and has rebuilt to the point of actual nation vs. nation war. You don't see raider tribes raiding major highways in our world do you?

By the way, the Mojave desert is a DESERT. Anyone who isn't a part of a military raiding party is dead. In the capital wasteland you can walk around, but in the desert its best to stay in the town otherwise you would die of exposure. If you also notice trade to the Mojave was shut down by the NCR due to concerns of things getting violent.

Everything is explained.
How does that explain everything? I understand that the sands in the mojave would have different encounters than dc but they could?ve been more creative than random beasts and faction grunts. There were slavers in the desert wandering around, it?s just that they weren?t doing anything than attacking the non-slaver faction that was wandering around doing nothing. Why couldn't these factions that did wander about do more interesting things.
That?s what I mean, the story was cool (constructed better than fallout 3) but the world itself was bland uninspired. Sure there were a couple of funky places but as MiracleOfSound pointed out above these places were few in number and not as deep as some of the crazier locations in Fallout 3. And I understand that it?s a desert, but it didn?t seem like one with every location a stone?s throw from another location.
And I don?t care where it?s set, I?m sure if they put their minds to it they could?ve come up with a few more interesting encounters than being attacked by wasps for the 100th time. Especially with all these locations on top of one another.
Well The nations are basically doing trench warfare, except instead of an open field they choose a river with a narrow crossing point over hoover dam. In fact that is the only thing that would happen as trade was shut down to the area. Actually, New vegas doesn't have many encounters, and instead used wild wasteland (which changes EVERYTHING). Monsters attacking you isn't an encounter, its just creature spawns to allow for a more organic world.
Yea. I was kind of expecting the wild wasteland trait to make things totally Fear and Loathing. It changed about a dozen little things around the map but it didn?t change everything and certainly wasn?t a fitting replacement for random encounters.
What MoS & I were trying to say is that the Fallout 3 Map was much more zen. You had these large and elaborate dungeons in the middle of broad empty spaces. Those spaces were made more exciting by spontaneous events that were many and random. Rather the FNV map crammed more locations that were smaller.
I just like the bigger and more spontaneous environment of Fallout 3. I can see how the story in FNV would be a bigger draw, but I always spend more time exploring all the environments in these games and it just wasn?t as interesting with this one.
Wild wasteland changed dialogue, and made much more changes than you expect.

http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Wild_Wasteland

Random encounters in Fallout 3 either did:

- Add a campsite of followers.
- random attack by various things.
- skill checks.
- one talking super mutant.

They were all depressing. The thing is, random encounters in fallout are originally funny or over the top. If they are not funny or over the top, then don't bother. What did you expect of the mojave? That nevada (and the west coast) is teeming with explorable buildings and big metropolises? The west coast was a WASTELAND before, and is a WASTELAND after. Big metropolises do not spring out of wastelands (usually). Go ahead and look at the population density of the united states and see which coast has more people. while you're at it look at a picture of America during night:



Notice how the Nevada area is completely dark. The lack of buildings makes "dungeons" real hard to do if there is a lack of buildings to work with (this made worse by the gamebryo engine which SHRINKS everything down, ever notice how the cars are big and streets are so small in fallout 3?). In fact the west coast is dominated mostly by low density areas which makes large dungeons nigh impossible (you can't make a big dungeon in a small house). You have to take into consideration that the west coast is vastly different than the east coast. The only cities that i can think of would be Los Angeles and San Fransisco, which are already civilized and beginning to be rebuilt due to the Shi Empire and NCR. California would be ruled out as civilization made the entire area safe which would bore most players because there would be nothing to do. Basically, all the big cities are already under control of nations which leaves tiny settlements and even tinier dungeons.
F3 definitely had more interesting encounters than those, I recall getting a mininuke from someone I saved in an earlier mission, recall meeting someone who really liked the book I helped write in an earlier mission, and an exploding UFO.
There were a lot more but already we got more random encounters than FNV. I would expect them to be different in FNV but they really could?ve thrown in a few more.
I probably would?ve appreciated the game a bit more if it was a little more like Nevada (like the pic you showed) with broad empty spaces between locations that had more depth. And you can give all the ?logical? reasons why cannon would dictate things being the way they are, it just didn?t feel as immersive and they could?ve made up reasons for it to be more spontaneous.
 

ChupathingyX

New member
Jun 8, 2010
3,716
0
0
Fallout: New Vegas didn't screw up the lore of Fallout. Plus Bethesda practically killed off Harold the bastards.
 

Vkmies

New member
Oct 8, 2009
941
0
0
New Vegas. Ahhh, the references. It was a great play for old-time fallout-fans. ^^
 

silverleaf81

New member
Oct 2, 2009
160
0
0
I liked Fallout New Vegas better, partly because i've played Fallout 3 so much that i'm really sick of it and partly because New Vegas is better. The only problem i had with it were the occasional bugs, but i got the PC version, the least buggy of them all.