Poll: Female babysitter charged for having sex with 14-year old boy.

[WilliamRLBaker]

Okay I'll first say this she needs to go to jail there shouldn't be a double standard.

2nd...God damn that kid is the man I would fist bump him right now If I could that babysitter is hot.

 

[Talvrae]

That's Jail plain and simple, yeah it's 5 and so years gap only, but still the kid was only 14...

 

[Talvrae]

Call it sexist or whatever but I think it does make a difference that the girl is 20 and the boy is 14 as opposed to the other way around. I realise the law is the law but I don't know why but it seems less serious than if it was a 14 year old girl getting seduced by a 20 year old male.

On top of all that I think it gets easy to look down on younger people, say this guy was 15 instead, How much do any of you think you grew smarter or wiser between 14-15-16 at the age of consent which here is 16.

I say no jail but a punishment should be given and that is for the law to decide.

In what does that make it better? I'm confused... if that,s a guy seducing a young girl it's wrong, but a woman seducing a young boy it's okey? How does that work for you? what's the difference, in both case it's someone more grownup who could be using autority over them, profiting of theyr naveity to abuse the other one... That's just plain wrong both way

 

[Jfswift]

ummm, why is a 14 year old being babysitted? That's more questioning... and we didn't even know it actually happened

I was wondering that too

 

[Phoenixlight]

If it was the other way around then sure but in this case a fine would be more appropriate.

 

[Pedro The Hutt]

Call it sexist or whatever but I think it does make a difference that the girl is 20 and the boy is 14 as opposed to the other way around. I realise the law is the law but I don't know why but it seems less serious than if it was a 14 year old girl getting seduced by a 20 year old male.

On top of all that I think it gets easy to look down on younger people, say this guy was 15 instead, How much do any of you think you grew smarter or wiser between 14-15-16 at the age of consent which here is 16.

I say no jail but a punishment should be given and that is for the law to decide.

In what does that make it better? I'm confused... if that,s a guy seducing a young girl it's wrong, but a woman seducing a young boy it's okey? How does that work for you? what's the difference, in both case it's someone more grownup who could be using autority over them, profiting of theyr naveity to abuse the other one... That's just plain wrong both way

I think the theory is that a fourteen year old boy wouldn't object nearly as much to having sex with a twenty year old girl than a fourteen year old girl would to having sex with a twenty year old man.

Which I suppose has some truth to it, many fourteen year old boys would love nothing more than to have sex with a hot girl, no matter what her age is, heck, most of them probably masturbate to pictures of women nearly twice their age at that point in life. But to say that they'd all gladly have sex with a not unattractive twenty year old would be crudely oversimplifying it. As I'm also fairly sure many would rather wait or at the least be intimidated by such a situation.

That said, I don't know the specifics of the incident but if she truly got him drunk (which now seems to be disputed, judging the edit on the first post), then yes, she should be charged for statutory rape and giving a minor liquor.

 

[Kuckles]

This depends on whether the boy wanted her to or not. If not, it's rape, and illegal. If it's a yes then depending on the age of the babysitter it's either illegal or not.

Also on a more immature note, Where the hell where babysitters like this when I was fourteen!

 

[vaderaider]

With the fact that he was being babysat I pressume he has no...Ummm... "happy Alone time". If he was ok with it then I don't think there should really be any harsh punishment...Lucky bastard.

 

[Blaster395]

Simple: Does the 14 year old want to press charges, or is he fine with the whole thing?

 

[Philip Petrunak]

You know, if they were both then years older, no one would give a shit. She'd be 30 and he'd be 24. Frankly, I'm bothered by shit like this. Rape and sexual assault are serious, emotionally scarring crimes that cam at times break a person's spirit. Rape is the complete denial of personal sovereignty and denial of identity.

Two young fucking is not rape. This appears to be nothing more then an unconventional couple. Let them go and live their fucking lives.

 

[Saviordd1]

If its fully consensual then I don't see a problem, the parents should have stopped hiring the babysitter, not put her up on criminal charges.

And yes, I would say the same thing if the genders were reversed.

If your that young and having sex with a 20 year old YOUR the one who has to live with that. As long as it wasn't actual rape then this is pants on head retarded as far as criminal charges go. Maybe police should be trying to find REAL rapists and pedophiles, not 2 idiotic young people having sex.

 

[TheDooD]

You know, if they were both then years older, no one would give a shit. She'd be 30 and he'd be 24. Frankly, I'm bothered by shit like this. Rape and sexual assault are serious, emotionally scarring crimes that cam at times break a person's spirit. Rape is the complete denial of personal sovereignty and denial of identity.

Two young fucking is not rape. This appears to be nothing more then an unconventional couple. Let them go and live their fucking lives.

Haters gonna man, Haters are gonna hate.

The kid's mom reported the girl. When I first had sex my mom was angry at me and still brings it up when she's losing an argument. A majority of the time mothers always hate the girls their sons deal with they're never "good enough". Overall the kid's mom was a bad mother, so the kid was babysat by the girl a lot. The kid found comfort in her that he didn't find in his mother, most likely she liked taking care of him so attraction happened during the amount of interaction they had and that pissed off the mother. It's simple jealously

Rape is normally a one time thing its about control and denial. A 20 year old girl basically giving herself to a 14 year old boy for a few months yeah that's "rape". Morality my ass people are just hating.

 

[Evidencebased]

Simple: Does the 14 year old want to press charges, or is he fine with the whole thing?

Well his parents seem to want to press charges, and he is still a minor (for the next 4 years), and an adult having sex with a minor is illegal, so it doesn't actually matter if he's fine with it because both his legal guardians and the entire legal system aren't fine with it. Adults have to protect their underage children even when the children tell them not to; for all we know he'll look back at this a decade later and thank his dad for standing up for him even if he's sulky about it now.

You know, if they were both then years older, no one would give a shit. She'd be 30 and he'd be 24. Frankly, I'm bothered by shit like this. Rape and sexual assault are serious, emotionally scarring crimes that cam at times break a person's spirit. Rape is the complete denial of personal sovereignty and denial of identity.

Two young fucking is not rape. This appears to be nothing more then an unconventional couple. Let them go and live their fucking lives.

An adult having sex with a child is actually rape, and yes it's serious. If the babysitter waited until he was old enough to consent then it would be no problem -- but instead she gained the parents' trust, snuck alcohol into the house to give to a child, and screwed an underage boy. That's not "unconventional" that's criminal and abusive. And really, let them "go live their lives"? This kid will be living at home with his parents for the next four years -- do you really imagine they would be cool with him dating a pedophile? Or letting her into the house at all, after what she did? She shouldn't be dating anybody; at best she has terrible judgement and total disrespect for his family, and at worst she is a rapist who has been grooming this teenage boy under the guise of babysitting him.

 

[Jesse Billingsley]

When boys hit that magical point in their lives, the greatest fantasy would be to get some with a smoking hot 20 year old chick. But thats a fantasy, and last I checked fantasys don't end with someone going to prison. I think both parties are at fault. As Glass Joe the Champ pointed out, they were at it for several months, it seems to me that neither one of them stopped to think "This could end badly if anyone found out." Its the kids fault for not trying to get the girl to stop, and because he was to busy living his fantasy, a girl has to go to prison, and the girl is at fault for not think about the outcome herself.

 

[DudeistBelieve]

To be fair, she could have just asked him. Every straight male from the age of 13 would want to tap that. Yes, it's double-standards, but fuck the preachy equality nonsense, we're are not all the same, especially when it comes to men and women. A 14-year old kid who gets nookie from that babysitter is a God among men, he will be saluted as a legend until at least middle age. If it had been a 20 year old male, on the other hand, it would be...shady.

14 year old kid is still a kid and doesn't know the ramifications of having sex like the 20 year old girl does. She could get pregnant and hell have to pay for it for the next 18 years and he wouldn't even have to have consented. For that reason, yeah, charge her and throw the **** in jail.

Plus, hell not every dude is like right on, tap that. Maybe this kid was an emo sack that wanted his first time to be special, or maybe he was a devout follower of religion. Just cause she was a fine piece of ass doesn't mean society turns to that kid and says "sorry, she was hot, you're feelings are in valid."

I'm just saying.

 

[devilkingx]

guys, you know that if the boy doesnt cooperate(which he doesnt have to) that they cant prosecute her right? that if the "victim" refuses to help prosecute there is no way that she can be convicted(think about it, how can you convict a "rapist" if the "victim" doesnt want to help?)

sooo if he knows that(i learned that from my awesome history teacher) she cant be put in jail, furthermore if he does that it'll prove that she shouldnt be convicted(you know theres a problem with the conviction when the "victim" doesnt even want to do it)

that being said, you people need to realise that kids are fucking humans, ive never understood why in america adults treat kids like house pets until they are 18 when their opinion and thoughts and feeling suddenly start mattering to you

Plus, hell not every dude is like right on, tap that. Maybe this kid was an emo sack that wanted his first time to be special, or maybe he was a devout follower of religion. Just cause she was a fine piece of ass doesn't mean society turns to that kid and says "sorry, she was hot, you're feelings are in valid."

I'm just saying.

if his feelings matter, then why are you more interested in putting her in jail then bothering to ask him what he thinks/wants?

 

[Brockyman]

Where was this babysitter when I was a kid?!

 

[trooper6]

She committed statutory rape at the very least. The kid is under the age of consent and the 20 year old, who had more power over the 14 year old, knew better.

She should go to jail.

I don't believe in the double standard. But then, I'm a feminist, so I believe in equality and double standards. So yeah. She needs to go to prison.