Poll: Fetish-animal crush - have u heard of it?

[Furious Styles]

Unfortnately it's not, the supreme court ruled the law "Too broad" to enact on the videos. It was almsot made illegal. I wish this law could have gone through

Surely cruelty to animals is illegal in the US, that has to be grounds to make it illegal.
I mean, if molesting kids wasn't illegal neither would child porn be illegal. I believe the same principal should apply. Videotaping and distributing illegal and disgusting things for sexual pleasure should be illegal, be it snuff films, child pornography or animal cruelty films.

But then I'm from the UK, we have a different system.

 

[Ulquiorra4sama]

Poor widdle kitties =v.v=

In all seriousness: I really can't stand animal cruelty. I've always been a sucker for kitties, puppies, bunnies, all those tiny and fluffy little animals with big round eyes that could thaw even Sub-Zero's heart. If i ever saw anyone stepping on a defenseless little animal i wouldn't charge them with anything... i'd step on them untill they couldn't move and them stomp them some more.

I voted 7, cuz this really makes me RAGE!

 

[Frankster]

*shudder*

I know this kinda fetish goes on between humans (i.e: guys wanting to be walked on by women in stillettos and what not) and i'm open minded when it comes to sexual fetishes as long as ONE rule is respected: no one is hurt except consenting adults.

This clearly goes against that rule, animals don't ask for this....
Yeah I'm definitly against it and I'm a person willing to defend a wide variety of sick fetishes in the name of personal freedoms T_T

 

[Celtic_Kerr]

Unfortnately it's not, the supreme court ruled the law "Too broad" to enact on the videos. It was almsot made illegal. I wish this law could have gone through

Surely cruelty to animals is illegal in the US, that has to be grounds to make it illegal.
I mean, if molesting kids wasn't illegal neither would child porn be illegal. I believe the same principal should apply. Videotaping and distributing illegal and disgusting things for sexual pleasure should be illegal, be it snuff films, child pornography or animal cruelty films.

But then I'm from the UK, we have a different system.

I'm at work, so I can't find the Youtube video

Basically, a man was convicted of selling videos of pitbulls fighting. In one video, it was a dog fighting video from Japan (there Dog fighting is legal), and the other video was a dog ripping a pig apart. He claimed he was selling the videos for educational purposes and demonstrating how Pit bulls will attack other dogs and (in the pigs case) how they hunt. He was released.

THe entire bill was dropped. Despite the fact that it could be contextualized (obviously ban animal cruelty crushed by bare or heeled feet for pornographic reasons) but that specification was never ni the original bill. Now because "For educational purposes" it can be considered an exception, the bill is basically invalid.

That's a problem, the moment a bill saying "No animal cruelty at all" has an exception added to it, the bill gets tossed because it's too broad and doesn't apply. Even if a new bill was added, it could take months or years to iron out what contexts animal cruelty isn't allowed to be used. lets not forget that PETA (sarcastic fucking woot) uses videos of animal cruelty in their campaigns to show just how wrong it is, so the bill was stopping them from doing that.

it's a piss poor fucking excuse, since they could EASILY keep the bill instated, incarcerate those breaking it, and make exceptions as they feel are valid rather than tossing a whole fucking bill that prevent sick minded cocks from doing this shit.

 

[JanatUrlich]

Not bothered to be honest. It doesn't affect me or other humans so I don't give a shiiiiittt

 

[rebus_forever]

Unfortnately it's not, the supreme court ruled the law "Too broad" to enact on the videos. It was almsot made illegal. I wish this law could have gone through

Surely cruelty to animals is illegal in the US, that has to be grounds to make it illegal.
I mean, if molesting kids wasn't illegal neither would child porn be illegal. I believe the same principal should apply. Videotaping and distributing illegal and disgusting things for sexual pleasure should be illegal, be it snuff films, child pornography or animal cruelty films.

But then I'm from the UK, we have a different system.

I'm at work, so I can't find the Youtube video

Basically, a man was convicted of selling videos of pitbulls fighting. In one video, it was a dog fighting video from Japan (there Dog fighting is legal), and the other video was a dog ripping a pig apart. He claimed he was selling the videos for educational purposes and demonstrating how Pit bulls will attack other dogs and (in the pigs case) how they hunt. He was released.

THe entire bill was dropped. Despite the fact that it could be contextualized (obviously ban animal cruelty crushed by bare or heeled feet for pornographic reasons) but that specification was never ni the original bill. Now because "For educational purposes" it can be considered an exception, the bill is basically invalid.

That's a problem, the moment a bill saying "No animal cruelty at all" has an exception added to it, the bill gets tossed because it's too broad and doesn't apply. Even if a new bill was added, it could take months or years to iron out what contexts animal cruelty isn't allowed to be used. lets not forget that PETA (sarcastic fucking woot) uses videos of animal cruelty in their campaigns to show just how wrong it is, so the bill was stopping them from doing that.

it's a piss poor fucking excuse, since they could EASILY keep the bill instated, incarcerate those breaking it, and make exceptions as they feel are valid rather than tossing a whole fucking bill that prevent sick minded cocks from doing this shit.

i agree with u all across the board

 

[latenightapplepie]

Perfect 7. This is abhorrent and every kind of wrong.

 

[Zealous]

-Snip-
Your answer to animals being killed by women in stilettos is to have the people who enjoy it trod on by... women in stilettos? So... you're going to torture people to death for animal cruelty. Torturing people is 100% illegal in the United States and most other countries... oh, and it's also illegal under international law. (So you might get a politely worded letter from the UN asking you to please stop torturing people.) [Source. [http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss14/nagan.shtm]]

Alternatively, rather than trampling these people to death, just force them to listen to Justin Bieber for ten hours straight -- it's not technically torture by law, but it certainly has the same effect.

Meh, I'm sure most of us wouldn't actually do it, it's just it inflames the passions and whatnot. So we feel the need for action and (for me at least and judging from the other responses here) violence is the response to violence that is the first thing we think of. As for us doing the same thing to them, I believe it's called "Poetic Justice": "Do unto other as they do unto cute, little, harmless animals" and all that.
Props for the Justin Beiber comment btw.

 

[rebus_forever]

i wish i had done a poll with the opportunity for those who were in favour rather than just un-phased by it

 

[II2]

It's cruel, needless, contemptful and the act IS illegal in western countries even if the governments can't figure out how to legally distinguish it from a hunting video.

Were this the first time I was exposed to the subject, my rage o' meter would have been at 7, but this sort of activity isn't really news to me - having first heard of the topic discussed in American politics in 1999 and seeing depictions in Encyclopedia Dramatica's "Offended" page.

It's not my crusade, but I've blown the whistle when I've inadvertently encountered it. I'm in support of people who do the same, but would advise them to try and tackle local instances because that's really the best anyone can do - Frankly, nobody is going to see any justice for the production of these videos in east Asian countries like China, where no animal protection laws really exist.

 

[rebus_forever]

It's cruel, needless, contemptful and the act IS illegal in western countries even if the governments can't figure out how to legally distinguish it from a hunting video.

Were this the first time I was exposed to the subject, my rage o' meter would have been at 7, but this sort of activity isn't really news to me - having first heard of the topic discussed in American politics in 1999 and seeing depictions in Encyclopedia Dramatica's "Offended" page.

It's not my crusade, but I've blown the whistle when I've inadvertently encountered it. I'm in support of people who do the same, but would advise them to try and tackle local instances because that's really the best anyone can do - Frankly, nobody is going to see any justice for the production of these videos in east Asian countries like China, where no animal protection laws really exist.

unfortunately i agree, but with the "developed" world not exactly setting a good example i dont see things possessing any momentum to change, there are animal rights activists in all countries, they would surely be given a morsel more hope if we were able to hold down some sensible laws in our sphere of the world.

 

[InnerRebellion]

This shit really makes me loose faith in humanity.

 

[delanofilms]

edit:
voted without reading (retarded i am)
10. perfect 10
at first i thought this was about furries
THIS is one more reason on my list why humans need to die

I hate misanthropes.

Guess what?
We hate you too.

 

[nothinghere]

How the heck do you even find out this kind of thing is exciting to you? I can kinda see how the law protects this. People go out hunt deer, killing them sometimes just for the joy of shooting them down. And a lot of people talk about how hurting any living thing is bad, a lot of people eat cows. You just chopped up an animal and ate its innards!

To the first, when you accidentally stepped on your pet hamster as a child.
Or more seriously, you read something in a book that described it, and it filled you with arousal rather then (or as well as?) disgust.

And to the second, there's an important difference between killing something, and killing something in a sadistic way.

As for the difference I was explaining why the law would protect it. People go out hunting and even though some people actually do something with the animal afterwards some still go out there to just get the thrill of putting a bullet through its head. It would take a lot of work and they would meet up with a lot of resistance if they tried to go through with it.

 

[Emissary Laito]

As for the difference I was explaining why the law would protect it. People go out hunting and even though some people actually do something with the animal afterwards some still go out there to just get the thrill of putting a bullet through its head. It would take a lot of work and they would meet up with a lot of resistance if they tried to go through with it.

Oh, heh.
Whoops, I meant to refer to this part.

And a lot of people talk about how hurting any living thing is bad, a lot of people eat cows. You just chopped up an animal and ate its innards!

I thought you were calling people out on their hypocrisy.
I was making a point that it wasn't necessarily hypocritical.

Should have said to the third, rather then to the second.

 

[rebus_forever]

looks like this is dying as a thread, just wanted to say ty to everyone who contributed, cheers.

http://www.stopcrush.org/ this is the organisation that u should look up if u want to find out more and possibly find out what u can do, there are no videos on the front page at the time of me
posting this, as for the contents that is up to u if you search within but be warned any videos or images may be traumatic, though as they are in no way illegal and not even subject to age limitations there is presumably no reason why anybody wouldnt be able to watch it and remain unaffected.

if the contents of the page change and it is felt that the link is unsuitable i apologise to the moderators and will gladly make alterations if requested.

people talk about a losing of faith in humanity, many of the comments here give me every reason to posses faith in humanity , justified by the result of the poll, ty again.

well done gamers for having a more potent sense of morality than the lawmakers deem relevant to be motivated by, must be all those violent games, oh wait that doesnt make sense, well done anyway ; P ^^----attempted irony

 

[similar.squirrel]

I know that at least one video like this existed, but I wasn't aware that it was a fetish. This is sick. People who create or get off on this sort of stuff..Well, suffice to say that their mice and pussy-cats should be subjected to high heels. If you see what I'm getting at. Fair is fair, after all. I'm sure the animals would concur.

Free speech my ass. If your fetish involves harming anybody or anything against their will, you're a sick excuse for a human being.