Poll: Final Fantasy: Fantasy or Sci Fi?

Recommended Videos

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
Honestly, I think the only ones that really delved into sci-fi were 8 and 13. I have no real preference so long as it's good.
 

Jezzy54

New member
Oct 19, 2008
243
0
0
Final Fantasy has never been science-fiction. The more recent games are science-fantasy, because they're still so far removed from the real world.
 

Vausch

New member
Dec 7, 2009
1,476
0
0
I like when technology channels magic. It creates this idea of a force that is capable of anything but when used in the right methods it becomes anything from a power source to an amplifier, or if someone doesn't use tech for their magic it lets them show things like materialisation or transmuation. It's the only way I could justify Waka having one of the most powerful weapons in the game be a bloody vollyball.
 
Jun 11, 2008
5,331
0
0
In general it is either Fantasy or a form of sci fi while some have been Fantasy with Steam punk. The series has no definitive form since it changes from game to game.
 

sXeth

Elite Member
Legacy
Nov 15, 2012
3,301
676
118
Of the listed options, probably the first one.

But as is heavily stated, they're prettymuch all fantasy, even if they're delving into steam/cyberpunk. FF1 had the space station before they remade it into a castle in later versions. I'm a little hazy on 2, and never played 3. 4 had a giant doomsday robot, prettymuch everything in the Tower, and you flew off on a spaceship to fight evil aliens at the end. 5 again gives another techy flying city, alien planets with forcefield generators, and assorted battles with missile firing enemies, and a superboss mech in the last dungeon. Six saw mechs with lasers and missiles all over the place (sure, they were magic-powered), the empire capital was a giant robotic city, and full fledged future factories. Nine also had a spaceship in it, along with the trans-dimensional alien bad guys.
 

mindfaQ

New member
Dec 6, 2013
194
0
0
It's all fantasy anyway, not scifi.

babinro said:
I frequently dislike sci-fi. There's just so much to learn about the world. Any typical rules that work in our world get thrown out the window. Fantasy comes across as far more grounded even with the existence of magic.
It actually is the other way around, fantasy can get more diverse from our world and world building is just as important there (or more important if we are going into high fantasy)
 

Lunar Templar

New member
Sep 20, 2009
8,225
0
0
it's not the setting, but the story, which is something that has been hit or miss 7-10, and utter shit 12 an onward.

so, both for me.
 

FrozenLaughs

New member
Sep 9, 2013
321
0
0
I am completely amazed by the people that say that all the games are fantasy and no Sci Fi. I never expected that kind of response at all! There is so much science in the later titles (7+) going on all over the place.

Why do we divide steampunk into a different category than sci fi?

Why is machinery and technology powered by magic *not* considered sci fi? If magic is a natural element of that world, isn't it the same as being powered by anything else? (Nuclear, solar, geo, hydro etc)

This is so interesting.
 

busterkeatonrules

- in Glorious Black & White!
Legacy
Jun 22, 2009
1,280
0
41
Country
Norway
Fantasy.

Playing VII, I was first put off by the sci-fi setting (having, after all, paid for something called Final Fantasy VII), but the game soon blew my mind completely, and eventually I even came to appreciate the unorthodox approach.

None the less, the greatest FF game I have ever played, is IX. Only when I saw IX's lush, green landscapes and magnificent medieval architecture, did I realize how inherently depressing VII's polluted wastelands had really been. I still love VII, but I can't help feeling that IX is what FF should be.

It might very well be that IX is simply a more optimistic and uplifting game, story-wise, too. Both protagonists feel severely maladjusted, and they both discover some incredibly alarming truth about themselves, but the key difference is that Cloud tends to let everything get him down (to his credit, though, he never actually feels like giving up), whereas Zidane remains happy and optimistic throughout, taking everything in stride until-
he gets his soul ripped out by a major villain and then learns that he exists only to destroy the world, along with everybody he ever knew and cared about
-and even then, he's back to normal in no time.

That said, the green grass and blue skies is what really sets the mood. IX is simply a feelgood-game, on a level that no other FF has approached for me, and without the fantasy setting, I really don't think that would be the case to the same extent.

Finally, from a non-nostalgic point of view, I think ANY change to the modern FF formula would constitute a major improvement, INCLUDING changing it back to more traditional fantasy settings!
 

busterkeatonrules

- in Glorious Black & White!
Legacy
Jun 22, 2009
1,280
0
41
Country
Norway
FrozenLaughs said:
I am completely amazed by the people that say that all the games are fantasy and no Sci Fi. I never expected that kind of response at all! There is so much science in the later titles (7+) going on all over the place.

Why do we divide steampunk into a different category than sci fi?

Why is machinery and technology powered by magic *not* considered sci fi? If magic is a natural element of that world, isn't it the same as being powered by anything else? (Nuclear, solar, geo, hydro etc)

This is so interesting.
Everybody has their own idea of what sci-fi really means, and where to draw the line between it and fantasy. Personally, I say that sci-fi is, by definition, fiction based on what impact more advanced science would have on the real world, as seen in The Invisible Man and similar stories.

Accordingly, in my opinion, ALL the FF games qualify as fantasy - BUT, I can see how people might disagree (we are, after all, talking about two distinctly different KINDS of fantasy, one of which I happen to prefer, so I decided to reply to the thread according to the principles presented because I'm here to contribute to the thread, not argue semantics!)
 

Neta

New member
Aug 22, 2013
167
0
0
I prefer Fantasy over Sci-Fi, I like my mages to be mages and not, um... some kind of steampunk techno-babble-tricians.
 

Kyrian007

Nemo saltat sobrius
Legacy
Mar 9, 2010
2,658
755
118
Kansas
Country
U.S.A.
Gender
Male
The thing that holds them all together (and I this is why I like Final Fantasy even though I'm critical of several of the recent entries) is that even though the OP has the fantasy/sci-fi split right... 1-6, 9, and 12 are ANIME fantasy and the rest are ANIME sci-fi. The comparisons don't hold up as well to literature or movies... but it's does when compared to anime. And that's fine by me. I had to vote sci-fi on the poll, because in order my preference is 8, 7, 1, 6, 10, 9, 5, 4, 2, 3, 12, and 13. But there was more than a little anime steampunk in 5 and 6. I could make an argument that 7 and 8 (more 7 than 8) are as much steampunk as sci-fi. Meaning that would be my preference as opposed to sci-fi.
 

lapan

New member
Jan 23, 2009
1,456
1
0
Almost all of them are a mix of a Fantasy scenario with some amounts of tech/sci-fi. Most of them have airships, some have "Magitech".
 

FrozenLaughs

New member
Sep 9, 2013
321
0
0
Now see, another post that separates steampunk and sci fi as two different things?

Kyrian007 said:
But there was more than a little anime steampunk in 5 and 6. I could make an argument that 7 and 8 (more 7 than 8) are as much steampunk as sci-fi. Meaning that would be my preference as opposed to sci-fi.
Why do we seperate them? It's another interesting distinction in this discussion.

It's not scifi if it's powered by magic, but it can still be steampunk, even if it's not powered by steam. Yet steampunk is it's own category, and not sci fi, despite the inherent pseudoscience of it. That's a very interesting circle of logic. :)
 

Foolery

No.
Jun 5, 2013
1,714
0
0
They are both. Science-Fantasy. You've got gods and magic, plus airships, guns, etc. Final Fantasy has been this way for a long time now.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
nohorsetown said:
Final Fantasy has never been sci-fi. Pseudo- modern/future settings don't make something sci-fi. Science does.
I was going to point this out as well, that all the FF games are actually fantasy. The difference between the categories is the the earlier installments were more "High Fantasy" in a classical sense (castles, dragons, wizards, etc) where as the later installments became more of what I like to call "Cyber Fantasy" with the futuristic settings, weapons, enemies, etc.

That said, I prefer the earlier installments. Those were the ones that I grew up with so those are the ones I'll cling to. The shift from High Fantasy to Cyber Fantasy is, in my eyes, a bastardization of the franchise and largely why I stopped playing FF games.
 

Maximum Bert

New member
Feb 3, 2013
2,149
0
0
Well I prefer VII,VI,X and IV over the others so there you go cant say I really care whether its fantasy or sci-fi or Steampunk or whatever other labels you want to attach to it as long as the games enjoyable for me.
 

FrozenLaughs

New member
Sep 9, 2013
321
0
0
Here is a snippet from the Wikipedia page about Science Fiction: (an interesting read)

Science fiction is largely based on writing rationally about alternative possible worlds or futures. It is similar to, but differs from fantasy in that, within the context of the story, its imaginary elements are largely possible within scientifically established or scientifically postulated physical laws (though some elements in a story might still be pure imaginative speculation).

The settings for science fiction are often contrary to consensus reality, but most science fiction relies on a considerable degree of suspension of disbelief, which is facilitated in the reader's mind by potential scientific explanations or solutions to various fictional elements. Science fiction elements include:
*A time setting in the future, in alternative timelines, or in a historical past that contradicts known facts of history or the archaeological record.
*A spatial setting or scenes in outer space (e.g. spaceflight), on other worlds, or on subterranean earth.
*Characters that include aliens, mutants, androids, or humanoid robots and other types of characters arising from a future human evolution.
*Futuristic or plausible technology such as ray guns, teleportation machines, and humanoid computers.[4]
*Scientific principles that are new or that contradict accepted physical laws, for example time travel, wormholes, or faster-than-light travel or communication (known to be possible but not yet feasible).
*New and different political or social systems, e.g. dystopian, post-scarcity, or post-apocalyptic.[5]
Paranormal abilities such as mind control, telepathy, telekinesis, and teleportation.
*Other universes or dimensions and travel between them.
Most of the series range in their exposure to the above list, with I think 8 being the strongest. Another interesting quote from Wikipedia, on defining Sci Fi:

"Science Fiction is like pornography, you can't always describe it, but you know it when you see it. "

I find it very interesting that people see and play the games, and their minds make the distinctions like "science-fantasy" and "cyber-fantasy" and similar terms, without going straight to "sci fi" like my mind does.

I wonder, does that come from being dedicated sci fi fans/readers? Maybe a dedicated fan if the Fantasy genre? Are some of you so engrossed in either genre that any fantasy in the mix automatically skews a game towards the Fantasy genre?