artanis_neravar said:
So you are saying 1,2,3,4,5,6?
No, I think that would be (very) wrong.
4, 5, 6 as a younger, less spaced out George Lucas intended or at least managed to deliver - back when he was not yet talking to the mushroom people living in his belly button.
Then, and only if you think it makes sense, get some prequel backstory goodness that still feels like fan-fiction to me from 1, 2, 3. SEE! Anakin Skywalker race the creatures from P. T. Barnum's amazing freakshow! SEE! the kid who will be Darth Vader! SEE! assorted other Darths, now with horns and stuff! If 4, 5, 6 are old ladies magically staying beautiful and forever young even though George Herbert West Lucas keeps giving them unwarranted facelifts and silicone injections, 1, 2, 3 are the slutty underage whores caked in make-up and dunked in a bathtub of Clive Christian Imperial Majesty Perfume for Women every morning because George really loves pimping it out.
Even though the Mad Monk Lucas who even managed to ruin Indiana Jones repeatedly stated that the original Star Wars films didn't turn out the way he wanted because of fincancial/technical/mental restraints, they are what they are. Imagine a world where everyone would go back and fumble around with their iconic work. To me, that's like painting a moustache on the Mona Lisa or peeing in your glass of excellent posh champagne. It's childish and immature and I just won't have any of it.