Both are perfectly acceptable to state. It's their own opinion, and there's nothing forcing anyone to listen to it. I, personally, find Phelps to be offensively stupid. His continued existence is an insult to all rational human beings on the face of the planet and the world would be a better place if someone were to drive a steamroller over him.cuddly_tomato said:Right, so one is doing it because it is his earnest belief. The other is doing it because he thinks he can get a laugh out of ripping into people who are disabled. By this logic freedom of speech is only acceptable when you don't actually believe what you are saying, and you know that you are actually talking shit when you say it. And this makes it better?brunothepig said:He can say it all he wants. I'm familiar with the man, and I'm well within my rights to say I think he's a hateful ignorant douche.cuddly_tomato said:Ditto to this.Crayzor said:But should somebody popular and infulential, like a comedian, be allowed to make jokes that could perpetuate a negative view of a certain group of people? Would you support a comedian making racist or anti-semetic jokes?
Just because we can doesn't mean we should - and Frankie Boyle really shouldn't have been ripping into folks with Downs syndrome like this. Still, it is only Frankie Boyle, a rather pathetic comedian who can't make people laugh with actual humour, so relies on being a beligerant, bullying asshole. Compare him to Michael McIntyre, who manages to bring the house down laughing every time without being nasty to anyone - not even politicians.
I am rather more concerned at the results of the poll and at the people defending Boyle in this thread.
Defend that as free speech. If not, explain the difference, other than the fact that people affected with Downs Syndrome are considerably less capable of defending themselves.
However, there's one major difference between this "preacher" and comedians that some find offensive, like Boyle. This guys serious. I have no problem with people saying anything for comedic value, and I'm not about to say Phelps should be fined or something for saying this. But the reason I don't hate Boyle is because he was joking.
I don't believe either should be punished, because I like free speech. However, you asked for the difference, there it is. One's joking, one's serious.
But I will always defend his right to spew his garbage, regardless of my feelings on it or how many people don't like it.
If something offends you, stop exposing yourself to it. I find this video you linked offensive to my sensibilities and his expectation to be taken seriously is an insult to anyone with a brain. Therefore, I hit the pause button and never looked back.
In the case of the OP, the woman could have easily stood up and walked out of the theatre whenever she pleased. She didn't. It's no one's fault but her own for continuing to expose herself to it.
Hell, I would posit that she's a bit of an idiot for being offended at all. She went in knowing ahead of time that his entire schtick is to be as offensive as he can possibly manage. Getting offended by anything he says is just dumb.