alright ive made 8 posts on this thread and i am now clincly bored, lets just agree to disagree ok, we're not in a court room after all.Agayek said:Maybe, like I said, I have no idea.cartzo said:i think it is more to do with the fact people cant preach hate any more, when a country like the uk (a country were it is illegal to preach hate) is compared to a country like (a country with complete freedom of speech where preaching hate is legal) you will see that in america the still shockingly high statistics of racially or homophobically motivated violence havnt changed since the late 80's, whereas in the uk the statistics of this kind of violence is now very low and it has been getting lower since preaching hate was made illegal.
in a way we have evolved culturally, but i think these laws aided in that.
That said, I would much rather live in a world where my life is in danger, but I can say whatever the hell I please.
Free Speech doesn't mean full disclosure. It doesn't even mean any disclosure. It means I can walk up to you and say "The government is full of dipshits" without penalty.Combined said:Give them too much of it and they'll get greedy and want more than that. Soon you're going to have to start divulging national secrets and other goodies.
Give them too little and they riot, which may throw you out of office.
In short, I'd say that Free Speech is good, but up to a point.
same to you if you're reading this lockheart.