But aren't we all really slaves?Commander Jack Rankin said:A man chooses. A slave obeys.
But aren't we all really slaves?Commander Jack Rankin said:A man chooses. A slave obeys.
Perhaps. Can an intense desire for internet pron and Laffy Taffy be considered slavery? If so I'm screwed.Sad Robot said:But aren't we all really slaves?Commander Jack Rankin said:A man chooses. A slave obeys.
Dunno, but it certainly sounds a lot like my life.Commander Jack Rankin said:Can an intense desire for internet pron and Laffy Taffy be considered slavery? If so I'm screwed.![]()
It is, for some reason, comforting to hear I'm not entirely alone with this idea on these boards.carpathic said:I must agree with Sad Robot here.
Yeah, same with me. I think free will is a nice idea, but, like you, ultimately I find it to be illogical, given what we know about how nature works.antipunt said:I pretty much agree with the quote, though reluctantly. I'd like the idea of free will, but I just don't ...really see much logic to it. Pretty much everything is predetermined by your genes and environment.
Yeah, exactly.Three Eyed Cyclops said:We are nothing but massive aquous chemical reactors and as such we are at the mercy (control) of what happens in them. Before the turn of the 20th century, there were physicist who claimed that they could predict the future for all of the universe for all time. All they needed was to know the exact location and velocity of all particles in the universe. In the 20th century we have the development of atomic theory leading to quantum mechanics. This is what dictates what will happen in the chemical reactions that occur in our body and since quantum mechanics is fundamentally based on statistics, then there will be probabilities associated with whether or not a reaction will occur. This in a simplistic way, there will be certain probabilities associated with the decisions that we make.
True. Whether or not it is moot, though, doesn't make it any less interesting in my mind.cookyt said:Whether or not free will exists is - in my humble opinion - moot point. Take a person - let's call him Max - and give him a choice between guessing two completely random choices: A and B. Regardless of what he chooses, his answer is already rapidly moving into the time-frame of yesteryear.
He may or may not have have had a legitimate choice between A and B once upon a time, but after it is made, the only point that line of reason serves him is to create a schema under which he is comfortable operating.
Damn it! I was going to use that qoute!Commander Jack Rankin said:A man chooses. A slave obeys.