SenisterDenister said:
How is being concerned for the psychological well being of people who can't distinguish a fetish from a lifestyle ignorant?
*sigh*
So just because the masses say something is right makes it right? No. There are absolutes. This is one of them. Truth of the matter is the masses hate you people. I hate you people.
The masses don't hate them, only a small amount of people on the internet do. Your average, everyday person pays almost no attention to the sexual fetishes of random people they don't know. Sure, they may be a little freaked out, or even disgusted by some of their fetishes, but they don't hate them for it.
You're the few dissenting voices that manage to mess up everything you get involved with on the internet by throwing your fetish into the mix wherever you go and whenever somebody tells you to stop you immediately call yourself a victim.
Singling out furries as if they are the sole group that has people that do this smacks of ignorance in the extreme. Every fetish, every sport, every form of media, attracts a group of people that do this. And do you know what you do when you encounter someone that does those sort of things? You ignore them. A small group of people is not indicative of the larger whole.
You people are cowards, you cope with your shitty lives by making yourself to be something you're not and you project it into your very existence. You live a lie and expect people to sit idly by and allow it when you're hurting yourself and your friends and family that you distance yourself from because "they don't understand you."
All of the voices saying the same unanimous opinion doesn't make it right. Right and wrong just is. This is wrong, you are wrong.
Heh, I'm not even going to bother with this. It's actually quite sad if you believe all that. Not to mention it's even sadder if you believe that your definition of right and wrong is the correct one.
Yoshemo said:
http://takuuingrey.deviantart.com/ him. Hes my ex and hes an asexual furry (you don't need sex to date or love btw)
I know you don't need sex to date/love someone. I was just wondering if there was some evidence for the claim. The claim which I misread as I say below:
Mookie_Magnus said:
Hmm... I can't seem to find any groups dedicated on FA. But...
Yoshemo said:
http://takuuingrey.deviantart.com/ him. Hes my ex and hes an asexual furry (you don't need sex to date or love btw)
Seems to have evidence.
The thing I was after though was that you claimed that the majority of....
No wait, I read it again and you said "large numbers of furries who are asexual". My mistake there, I thought you were claiming that furries were mostly asexual, but it was just me being a spaz and not being able to read properly.
As for what you did say, though, I know there are a number of furries that are asexual. Some of the (non-sexual) art that I've come across while looking for other stuff was actually pretty cool, but it's not my thing so I don't really look into it all that much.
