That's what people said about TOR and every other new MMO that came out after WoW.ResonanceSD said:G-G-G-Guild Wars 2 is on the horizon. Goodbye WoW, and the days of the media basing all their assumptions of gaming off you guys.
That's what people said about TOR and every other new MMO that came out after WoW.ResonanceSD said:G-G-G-Guild Wars 2 is on the horizon. Goodbye WoW, and the days of the media basing all their assumptions of gaming off you guys.
TheLizardKing said:That's what people said about TOR and every other new MMO that came out after WoW.ResonanceSD said:G-G-G-Guild Wars 2 is on the horizon. Goodbye WoW, and the days of the media basing all their assumptions of gaming off you guys.
I'm not disagreeing with you. I think GW2 looks amazing. But it won't kill WoW, so the Media will always compare every MMO to WoW.ResonanceSD said:TheLizardKing said:That's what people said about TOR and every other new MMO that came out after WoW.ResonanceSD said:G-G-G-Guild Wars 2 is on the horizon. Goodbye WoW, and the days of the media basing all their assumptions of gaming off you guys.
Ok, the difference between you and me is that I've actually played those three games. Have you tried out ToR and GW2? No, you bloody well haven't. GW2 is objectively better than both ToR (which isn't that hard) and WoW.
quite true GW2 wont kill wow, wow has already killed itself. its simple they puled the trigger with cata and have been slowly but surly dieing since then. Now GW2 is going to pretty much quicken the flow of blood,as it were, from wow since its a free to play game that looks better.TheLizardKing said:I'm not disagreeing with you. I think GW2 looks amazing. But it won't kill WoW, so the Media will always compare every MMO to WoW.ResonanceSD said:TheLizardKing said:That's what people said about TOR and every other new MMO that came out after WoW.ResonanceSD said:G-G-G-Guild Wars 2 is on the horizon. Goodbye WoW, and the days of the media basing all their assumptions of gaming off you guys.
Ok, the difference between you and me is that I've actually played those three games. Have you tried out ToR and GW2? No, you bloody well haven't. GW2 is objectively better than both ToR (which isn't that hard) and WoW.
its not better, its the same hotkey gameplay we've been using since ultima and everquest.ResonanceSD said:TheLizardKing said:That's what people said about TOR and every other new MMO that came out after WoW.ResonanceSD said:G-G-G-Guild Wars 2 is on the horizon. Goodbye WoW, and the days of the media basing all their assumptions of gaming off you guys.
Ok, the difference between you and me is that I've actually played those three games. Have you tried out ToR and GW2? No, you bloody well haven't. GW2 is objectively better than both ToR (which isn't that hard) and WoW.
I have a story for you all. Once, there was this city named Rome. Rome was pretty damn awesome. It wasn't completely original, because it took a lot from the Etruscans and Greeks, but the things they took they seemingly did better. Many many people lived in Rome and her outlying provinces, and it lasted this way for hundreds of years. Life was good in the Roman Empire.ecoho said:quite true GW2 wont kill wow, wow has already killed itself. its simple they puled the trigger with cata and have been slowly but surly dieing since then. Now GW2 is going to pretty much quicken the flow of blood,as it were, from wow since its a free to play game that looks better.TheLizardKing said:I'm not disagreeing with you. I think GW2 looks amazing. But it won't kill WoW, so the Media will always compare every MMO to WoW.ResonanceSD said:TheLizardKing said:That's what people said about TOR and every other new MMO that came out after WoW.ResonanceSD said:G-G-G-Guild Wars 2 is on the horizon. Goodbye WoW, and the days of the media basing all their assumptions of gaming off you guys.
Ok, the difference between you and me is that I've actually played those three games. Have you tried out ToR and GW2? No, you bloody well haven't. GW2 is objectively better than both ToR (which isn't that hard) and WoW.
Have you played it? It actually does some things better. At its core its still a hotkey based game, but it has elements of movement and defense WoW never had in its dodge mechanic. Also, the structure of the game's events makes it so that groups are likely to spring up to take down large group oriented challenges. I've seen it happen in the Beta. I'll ask you actually play something before getting a basic mechanic completely and utterly wrong.Joseph Alexander said:its not better, its the same hotkey gameplay we've been using since ultima and everquest.ResonanceSD said:TheLizardKing said:That's what people said about TOR and every other new MMO that came out after WoW.ResonanceSD said:G-G-G-Guild Wars 2 is on the horizon. Goodbye WoW, and the days of the media basing all their assumptions of gaming off you guys.
Ok, the difference between you and me is that I've actually played those three games. Have you tried out ToR and GW2? No, you bloody well haven't. GW2 is objectively better than both ToR (which isn't that hard) and WoW.
it ,thank fully, isn't depending on keeping subscribers, which is good cause it'd end up like all the other MMOs that banked on story and PvP to keep people's interest... dead or dying.
so far all GW2 is , is a online single-player game(which is what they call it) that you can play with other people.
in short its just like D3.
GW2 is not the Visigoths, no more then Tor was the Visigoths.Ftaghn To You Too said:I have a story for you all. Once, there was this city named Rome. Rome was pretty damn awesome. It wasn't completely original, because it took a lot from the Etruscans and Greeks, but the things they took they seemingly did better. Many many people lived in Rome and her outlying provinces, and it lasted this way for hundreds of years. Life was good in the Roman Empire.ecoho said:quite true GW2 wont kill wow, wow has already killed itself. its simple they puled the trigger with cata and have been slowly but surly dieing since then. Now GW2 is going to pretty much quicken the flow of blood,as it were, from wow since its a free to play game that looks better.TheLizardKing said:I'm not disagreeing with you. I think GW2 looks amazing. But it won't kill WoW, so the Media will always compare every MMO to WoW.ResonanceSD said:TheLizardKing said:That's what people said about TOR and every other new MMO that came out after WoW.ResonanceSD said:G-G-G-Guild Wars 2 is on the horizon. Goodbye WoW, and the days of the media basing all their assumptions of gaming off you guys.
Ok, the difference between you and me is that I've actually played those three games. Have you tried out ToR and GW2? No, you bloody well haven't. GW2 is objectively better than both ToR (which isn't that hard) and WoW.
But over time, Rome lost its spark. No one knows for sure. Some say it overextended with expansionism. Others say there was a moral change and the lack of an old trustworthy core caused it to collapse. Yet more say it ran out of real enemies, and grew stagnant.
Outside of Rome, there were other kingdoms and empires. None were as old and grand though. A few thought they could take Rome, but were almost always crushed under its foot and turned into vestigial kingdoms. Over time, however, as Rome continued to collapse, smaller kingdoms took bits and pieces. Some land here, some more over there, slowly wearing down the empire as it lost land and citizens. Eventually, a couple of bigger Germanic and barbarian kingdoms were formed. They learned from the mistakes of Rome, and did some things better. Like pants. Over time, these larger kingdoms tore away at Rome, taking vast chunks. They didn't kill Rome, but a number of them all combined wounded her fatally. Eventually Rome, long since outdated and irrelevant, collapsed finally. The world was full of chaos for a while, as many small kingdoms fought over the remains of Rome. But eventually, new and better empires were founded.
Guild Wars 2 will not kill WoW. Instead, I posit that GW2 is the Visigoths.
EDIT:Have you played it? It actually does some things better. At its core its still a hotkey based game, but it has elements of movement and defense WoW never had in its dodge mechanic. Also, the structure of the game's events makes it so that groups are likely to spring up to take down large group oriented challenges. I've seen it happen in the Beta. I'll ask you actually play something before getting a basic mechanic completely and utterly wrong.Joseph Alexander said:its not better, its the same hotkey gameplay we've been using since ultima and everquest.ResonanceSD said:TheLizardKing said:That's what people said about TOR and every other new MMO that came out after WoW.ResonanceSD said:G-G-G-Guild Wars 2 is on the horizon. Goodbye WoW, and the days of the media basing all their assumptions of gaming off you guys.
Ok, the difference between you and me is that I've actually played those three games. Have you tried out ToR and GW2? No, you bloody well haven't. GW2 is objectively better than both ToR (which isn't that hard) and WoW.
it ,thank fully, isn't depending on keeping subscribers, which is good cause it'd end up like all the other MMOs that banked on story and PvP to keep people's interest... dead or dying.
so far all GW2 is , is a online single-player game(which is what they call it) that you can play with other people.
in short its just like D3.
But why would any "lore fanatic" even give wow a second look. Its lore is about as deep as an episode of Star trek TOS (and sadly, most of the wow story/lore is just repurposed ToS story arcs and other facelifted material)If your a lore Fanatic like myself