TylerC said:
SomeBritishDude said:
I don't get it either. Fable 2 was a poorly made game. Yes, it had some good ideas, but it just ended up being a buggy, shallow and inconsistant game. Its nothing compared to Left 4 Dead
In my opinion L4D is shallow. At least Fable II has a story.
And Fable II wasn't poorly made compared to hundreds of other games, they just need to shut Peter Molyneux up. Sure it has some bugs, but what game doesn't?
I'm going to be the bigger man here and...Oh fuck it.
What! Yes, Left 4 Dead has no story, but then again, it doesn't need one. Its muliplayer experience. Throwing in cut-scenes and plot points would have made it very tirsome very quickly.
And did you actually like Fable II's story? Did you like Hammer?! Did you like how the story followed one linear line, no twists, no turns? Did you like the fuck you, kick in the balls, tea bag your arse ending? "Oh, Lionhead only gave us half game, Oh well, Im off to spend £20 plus on DLC". Stephen Fry was the only decent character in the whole thing.
And yes, games had bugs. But theres bugs, and theres Fable II bugs. There bugs, and there are bugs that stop you from playing the game, bugs that happen to major quest characters, bugs that make you wonder whether Lionhead actually played their game before releasing it. The whole thing was rush and slapped together, sad attempt at a finished game.
*Kicks monitor, stomps off, regretts post*