Poll: GM food.... wait.... what?

[mjcabooseblu]

You know, anonymous could easily solve the issue of Greenpeace and PETA existing. Just saying.

They'd simply have to have a large number of their forces infiltrate the groups and become members, then do something so undeniably evil (in the name of Greenpeace/PETA, of course) that world governments have no choice but to shut them down, by forceful means if necessary.

Not saying that's a great idea, but if the problem gets too big, I'm pretty sure I know who's going to take a stand against their bullshit for us. And yes, obviously what those fucking morons did was wrong.

 

[Raognerrrm]

The only problem I have with GM foods is that I have allergies to lots of things.
If, for example, they were to put fish genes in tomatoes and I eat those tomatoes, I could end up rather sick.
So as long as they're open with what they do and label everything, I'm fine with it.

I think Greenpeace was completely wrong to destroy the crop, though. If they believed GM foods are bad for eating, the experiments could have proved them correct. To me, destroying them means they don't have any reason to dislike GM foods.