Good grammar, and its defense, is often only there to serve the purpose of feeling higher than others.
I disagree that you where clinically depressed, as you where diagnosed with it during a time when the definition of 'clinically depressed' was so tangible that near all social induced depressions where ubiquitously attached to it with little to no actual scientific or medical backing to support it. Quiet literally, the only thing that actually diagnosed you with clinically depression was you're word and the way a doctor interpreted it. There was no test at the time based in clear medicine or science in order to clearly prove that you where clinically depressed at all, only words and interpretations.
Based on this, you're suggested coping method is inadequate and borderline criminal negligence. This is because you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, and adherence to this can lead to the physical harm or death of an individual suffering from true clinical depression.
Oh, so only 2 years ago (arbitrary number of years), psychologists have learned to adequately define people as depressed? And my method works, for me at least. Else I would've offed myself 10 years ago, no? I doubt you've been lying in your bed with a knife, ready to jab it through your heart. Or contemplating jumping out of a window on the 8th floor of an apartment multiple times. I was suicidal for over 3 years, I had no friends to rely on (trust issues since I was 10, my best and only friend betrayed me, I didn't trust people for over 5 years) and no reason to live (until I started defining new goals in life). I don't know about you, but I'd say those are signs of some sort of depression.
And I'm enjoying life now. Got a problem with that or something?
Further more, through several composition, literacy, and psychological classes
So textbook knowledge > real life experience? K, sure. Uh huh.
Move along, people.
Yes. Textbook knowledge is based on measurable fact.
Your anecdotal evidence is based on your perception which may or may not be adequate to the situation.
From my personal experience with injury, a simple bandage is sufficient for any bleeding injury. But openly assuring individuals that merely to wrap a deep gash which transects the Femoral Artery as being sufficient to staunch bleeding... well that is gross negligence.
There is a reason why science calls ?real life experience? anecdotal evidence?