No. they're on equal footing. Breathing and COD4, neither one is any good without the other.Ultimathul said:youre not being very realistic now. a game can never be as good as breathing.UNKNOWNINCOGNITO said:WTF Dude how can you not buy COD4 !Pi_Fighter said:I have never actually played the game (shame on me). I am just wonderring how good everyone here thinks it actually is and whether or not I should buy a copy
thats like not breathing
not having COD4 is like throwing your game console out a 18 story high window
go buy a cheap copy get online and jizz your pants form how awesome that game is
jiss you pants form how traumatizing that game is
jiss your pants from how fun that game is
BUY THAT GAME ! i ended up spending more then i wanted on the game but that game is so worth the money
I agree with this.onelifecrisis said:If you're asking about the single player campaign then I can tell you that CoD4 is a steaming pile of horse manure. It's not a game at all, it's an interactive movie, and all the enemies are infinitely respawning which fecks up the gameplay (not to mention the immersion). Run and gun? You'd better! Because every bad guy you down will be back in five seconds, if you hang around that long.
What on earth is the point in shooting someone if they're just going to come back to life five seconds later? Doesn't that take away the whole point of that thing in your hands at the bottom of the screen which, you know, defines the fecking genre? If real guns caused real people to just look dead for five seconds before coming back in the same place all fine and dandy then I don't think real soldiers would use them anymore. Why this logic should fail in in a video game is beyond me, but if the number of interactive movie stars (CoD4 fanboys) on the internet are anything to go by then I must be missing something.
But if you think I'm not then do yourself a favour and buy anything else.