Poll: How important is getting the 100% completion to you?

[Sparrow]

Depends how easy it is to get/how close I already am to it. Like, in Fable 2 I had to collect three keys because I'd found the main bulk doing other missions. I figured, "why not?" and unlocked me some chests.

Never.

Just strikes me as a waste of time.

Ok, this confuses me. Playing games IS a waste of time. It's fun waste of time, though. This is going to sound like me being pedantic, but don't you meant it doesn't strike you as fun?

 

[Poetic Nova]

I don't really care about getting 100% as long as the story is finished it's fine. Do want to finish Rage 100% though.

 

[MercurySteam]

Depends on how easy it is. I got 100% for AC2, Bioshock, Dragon Age: Origins (The Harvester was a *****, though.) and Dragon Age 2. On about 98% for ME2, Dead Space 2 and I doubt I'll ever get the last achievements for those games.

 

[Odbarc]

I've never gotten 100% completion on anything.
Most of those untouched stupid quests are boring, tedious quests like, "Go out of your way 5 times for no reward", "Garbage-pick-up 1000 coins", "Meaningless alternatives, and "Fail or succeed in an obscure way".
Why?

What I hate the most is a new game when you constantly get the "Mission complete bronze" popping up on your screen blocking whatever cinematic your actually trying to focus on.

 

[TheRussian]

Almost never, the only game I've ever completed 100% was Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas on PS2, and I'm damn proud of it.

 

[CardinalPiggles]

If I think I can then I will, but even then I would likely give up on it. I just love to see something say 100% complete.

Nope, I never actively try for 100% completion in anything nor do I care about the achievements/trophies. I just play a game until I beat it or stop having fun.

I envy you.

 

[babinro]

Only when it adds to the gameplay / story. StarCraft 2 is a great example where achievements/completion in single player campaign adds to the overall game experience.

Achievements or goals that are tedious and add little or nothing to the actual gaming experience are never purposefully done:
Civ 5 - Build 500 temples
Fable 2 - Own every property in the world
Oblivion - Collecting 100 Nirnroots

 

[II Scarecrow II]

I try to get 100% Achievements where possible, but I must say I have a loathing for collection/hunt type achievements, and I abhor it when they add new achievements that require DLC to get. For example, I earned 100% completion in Halo Reach just for them to add more achievements with DLC and to get those achievements you HAVE to buy the DLC. At that point I was sick of the game and I wasn't going to buy DLC, so my 100% completion for it is ruined.

Some games I will just play for the story, as some of the achievements are too hard for even me, or the game is simply boring, but games I enjoy I will attempt to get as many achievements as possible. I refuse to grind a game though simply for an achievement. While I hate multiplayer achievements, I will do my best to get them, but only if I enjoy the multiplayer. I don't mind grinding for level 45 in BF3, but there was not a snowballs chance in hell I was getting to the max level in Homefront.

EDIT - exception is Crysis 2. Terrible game, but the only one I had at the time, so I forced myself to get everything for it to extend the playing time...
EDIT 2 - really mad at BF3, I have every achievement except 1 that has to be performed with an online Co-Op partner and requires more than a dozen simultaneous headshot. Yeah, fuck you DICE.

 

[Section Crow]

I just do when i'm bored, nothing more nothing less

it's a way to kill time for me although as of late it seems time wants to kill me...

 

[Upbeat Zombie]

Really depends on the game. If it's a game I really like I will go for all the achievements to make the game last as long as it can. Otherwise if the game is bad, or just meh I will probably finish it but not worry about any of the achievements.

 

[The Night Shade]

Depends i like to do all the sidequest because most of them are fun and rewarding but collectibles and other stuff i usually don't unless they give you a good reward, a horrible example was in AC 2 where you need to collect feathers seriously feathers i fell like an idiot collecting them and the reward was a useless cape.

 

[josemlopes]

I actually got Saint's Row 3 to 100% although it isnt all that hard and it is fun to reach it (very little collectible hunting, and the one that there is is easy and fast to complete).

I still have to complete the Hitman, Chop Shop and Challenges for the achievements though.

 

[putowtin]

It's not something I set out to do, but if I get to 80-85% without really trying, then I suddenly feel compelled to reach 100%

 

[C F]

I'll try my best to complete a majority of the sidequests, but I won't go through multiple playthroughs on increasing difficulty just to get all of the LIVE achievements (I'm looking at you, Mass Effect).
The only game in which I pursued that endeavor was Halo: Reach, because I perused the achievements list and saw that they were all reasonable. I soloed the campaign on Legendary and knocked out half of the achievements in one go. The rest came to me through a bit of multiplayer. I never went back and got the DLC achievements, though.

 

[phazonbiologist]

It depends on the game, but I'll usually go for the 100% if the payout is worth it. For example, I went for 100% in Bioshock because I wanted to hear all the audio diaries, but I didn't bother with flags in Assassin's Creed because I was told there was no reward for it.

 

[C F]

I've only ever got 100% completion in one game...which was Assassins Creed 2 and it took me absolutely ages....and several hours of reading through on-line help sheets to find all the feather locations...haven't even attempted 100% in other AC2.5 or AC2.75...just not worth the time and effort.

I never bothered appeasing 'S Creed or its sequel in that aspect.

But let me tell you that Brotherhood and Revelations are actually much easier to get 100% synch in. You can buy maps to find the Borgia flags in Brotherhood, and after stumbling across 50 of the Animus fragments in Revelations, the other ones automatically appear on your map. Having only one city and those fast travel tunnels really help matters. Aside from the occasional thumbtack in your heel (which often a quick Youtube video can help), those two games are a cakewalk.

 

[SpAc3man]

Only if it adds more gameplay. Skyrim is a good example. I want to finish all the quests as they can vary a lot and have interesting stories behind them. Games where 100% normally means "get all trophies" like in the CoD games can be ignored. Doing something a 1000 times does not make it more fun.

 

[yman15]

Not really I think the closest I got was around an 80% in Infamous but I didn't go all the way because it had one of those find them all achievements which I never go for because they aren't any fun at all.Basically if the achievement is skill based and not to much of a pain in the ass to do then I'll give it a shot but if it's one of those find all 150 gems in the game world then fuck it.

Actually I just remembered that I beat all the levels with mario in Super Mario Galaxy because of the promise of a special ending but the ending was the same as the normal one except now I get to play the whole game over again with luigi... I was not happy about that.

 

[Elvis Starburst]

It very much depends the game for me. Hexyz Force, nah. Playing each story once was enough, and I decided to watch the True final boss you get to play AFTER doing it ALL again to get these pieces of some relic (I didn't know where to get them at first).

Monster Hunter Freedom Unite? Hell, 100% that game, cause it was loads of fun to do!

So yeah, each game can make me motivated to beat every single little thing in it!