A man who thinks he knows everything knows nothing. But I think i don't know much about anything, therefore I am genius. There can be no question.
I AM superior to a mechanic, I'm an engineer. I know painfully well how dumb they are. *face palm*Yopaz said:There are different kinds of intelligence. Logics is one. Social intelligence is one. If you buy one of those puzzles along the line of getting a ring removed from a jumble a mechanic is more likely to see how to solve it rather than a mathematician because there's mechanical IQ. Some mechanics are simply better at seeing functionality based on the structures rather than logics. However by all means go on believing you are superior to all mechanics and that all mechanics are stupid while ignoring that you do in fact lack social intelligence.tavelkyosoba said:it has been proven time and time again that a very "street smart" person will perform extremely high on a standard IQ test. So will an artist, or a writer, or an engineer, because the tests measure intelligence, not knowledge.Yopaz said:Intelligence is more than book smart and you can measure more than booksmart or IQ. Let's take a mechanic. He might not know too much about biology or chemistry, but if you put a biologist and a mechanic to fix a car you can bet your ass that in most cases the mechanic will be proven superior. Social intelligence also matters.violinist1129 said:Sorry about thatThe Virgo said:Someone made this same exact thread a few days ago. However, since you're new and you want an answer, I think I'm somewhere above average, between 127 and 137.
I was mostly referring to testable booksmarts rather than common sense, but I'm assuming the average person here is higher than the average person period, so just IQ scores aren't really reliable.DeadlyYellow said:Depends on how you quantify intelligence. Being booksmart is a common measure, but often lacks practical application. Are you smarter because you know many things or because you can do many things?
I am smarter than average in the areas I'm smart in. I'm fairly good in language, I can discuss a wide variety of subjects, I have good understanding in market economics, chemistry, biology, sociology, psychology, technology and religion.
In high school I got all the answers correct on a math exam, including 2 questions that were so hard that they were removed from the exam all over the country.
All in all I am somewhere above the average. I'm far form a genius, but I'm smarter than the average in my areas. Where literature, art and social intelligence are clearly my weakest areas.
There are not different kinds of intelligence, there's just different knowledge.
Also, mechanics are dumb, that's why they're mechanics. They pretend they posses some unique and unsearchable knowledge...but they really just have more tools than you.
Here its likely a combination of the two. Between the subject matter often found on this site and the moderation of this forum it tends to scare off many of the less intelligent people. While it is impossible to have a completely logical and well mannered debate anywhere on the internet there are fewer trolls around here than many other forums.jyork89 said:Woohoo... another self ego stoking thread... Either the escapist is only frequented by geniuses, which I would like to believe, but highly doubt, or everyone thinks themselves smarter than everyone else. Science says it's the latter and frankly, these threads are just proving the existence of superiority bias.
teach me!AdamRhodes said:I'm smarter than the average bear. To wit, I scored in the top five percent of SAT scores across the nation. Also I used "to wit" properly in a sentence.