So can your eyes. Just a 2D image constantly changing (at a terryfing refresh rate). But it doesn't matter. I say Diablo 2 looks great in 2D/3D setting. A lot of games would lose charm if they had changed to 3D. Any who says you can't have a 3D characters on 2D maps anyway?z121231211 said:Your moniter can only do 2D. 3D is just a buch a 2D shapes skewed to look 3D.
theres only somthing like 34TheGreenManalishi said:There is an infinite number of dimensions, but only 12 are known, and 8D is most certainly superior.
Don't be so rigid in your perceptions, man.Leorex said:theres only somthing like 34TheGreenManalishi said:There is an infinite number of dimensions, but only 12 are known, and 8D is most certainly superior.
Exactly. You haven't played a real game till you've played a game in N-dimensional Hilbert space.TheGreenManalishi said:Don't be so rigid in your perceptions, man.Leorex said:theres only somthing like 34TheGreenManalishi said:There is an infinite number of dimensions, but only 12 are known, and 8D is most certainly superior.
You can't put the 2 up against each other.Singularly Datarific said:My brother keeps going on about how 2d is better than 3d, would you agree with this?
shut up and say something about the topic or dontLeorex said:Why would you make another topic .
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.109646
duke nukem>doomkalaim said:ok. And another useless poll just good enough to join another thousand of it's kind, to name some :
"Sega is better than Nintendo" and it's counterpart "Nintendo is better than Sega"
"Amiga is better than Atari" and same goes there.
"Doom owns Duke Nukem"
and so on...
Some game are meant to be in 3D, some are born to be 2D and both got 'em charms.
Here's your argument settled, let's move on plz.