Poll: If there were no consequences to you're actions....

[Devil'sAdvocate]

Just curious...

You see, civilization is great. It has constructed these rules and codes to live by over the ages which means we don't savage out on a regular basis (what would the neighbours think dear!?). I was just wondering what people would do if that would disappear for, say, an hour or so. A giant free for all. Do what you like...

What would you do?

 

[Mayhaps]

The question doesn't make much sense[small], and I'm not talking about your grammar.[/small]
All of those things do have consequences, if you murder someone, they die and if they don't, there would be no point in doing it.

If you mean no trouble with the law, this is how I see it:
It doesn't really matter to me, I don't carry around a law-book to check if what I'm about to do is legal or not. I have no trouble breaking the law in my country, I do it all the time, and so does everyone I know. (Not talking about piracy).

 

[Hoplon]

Hello Parliament and a FN Minimi

 

[Dave In A Cape]

I think what OP means is what would you do if there was no repercussions to something like murder.

For me it's murder, I have a loooooooong list of people the world would be better off without.

 

[Tanner The Monotone]

I would still have my morals, which would probably still keep me in check.

 

[Scarim Coral]

Do I really got to choose one of the options above? I already know what I want to do if there were no consegences to my action.

Anyway I guess I going to be a pyromancer seeing how I am not cruel/ psycho enough to kill an animal. Also thinking of eating human flesh creep me out. While I do hold grudes to a certain people I know, I'm too lazy to actually try to kill them myself seeing how my current health and lack of training will result in a long and struggling attempt to kill that person (nor am I rich enough to hire someone to do it for me).

 

[Vanitas likes Bubbles]

I'd like to burn down a tree, like an old tree.

Yeah, still i'd have my morals and stuff.

 

[Stasisesque]

Holy shit, none of those. Why isn't something relatively tame like robbery included?

 

[Phasmal]

None, and I'm not voting cause I really don't wanna know how many people here want to go out raping.

 

[Relish in Chaos]

I'd steal whatever I want and maybe streak through the city drunk or something like that.

 

[Midnight Llamaman]

None of the above, I'm not just waiting for society to crumble so I can get some murdering on. Even if you wouldn't suffer repercussions, the choices are still wrong.

 

[Spambot 3000]

I don't see the 'all of the above' option. Not voting.
Just kidding, I'd probably just eat flesh. Setting fire to shit sounds like fun as well, but human flesh is priority number one.

 

[BlueberryMUNCH]

Me not doing those things has nothing to do with society's morals; I don't do those things because they're just wrong.
Would I rape someone if I wouldn't get caught? Fuck no, I'd still be raping someone and I just wouldn't do that.

This is a deeply disturbing question, at the end of the day.
Glad to see that...most...of the replies agree with me...although some of them are troubling.

 

[Hoplon]

While I would broadly agree, my rage speaks loudly to me of people that would send others to die for them to get paid.

a 5.56 to the brain pan seems like the least I could do.

 

[Eamar]

Why is streaking not an option?? Seriously, if I wouldn't get arrested for public indecency and there would be no other consequences (people hurling abuse etc) I'd totally be running around town in my birthday suit.

2 people say rape... this disturbs me. At least if you say murder you can "justify" it by going after serial killers (irony ftw), dictators, whatever. How do you justify rape and why would you want to do it?

I said set fire to something, because I've always had a weird fascination with fire and it would be satisfying to burn something like a derelict building without the risk of it spreading and killing someone.

 

[Yuno Gasai]

A lack of consequences doesn't mean I'm suddenly going to drop my morality.

 

[BlueberryMUNCH]

Me not doing those things has nothing to do with society's morals; I don't do those things because they're just wrong.
Would I rape someone if I wouldn't get caught? Fuck no, I'd still be raping someone and I just wouldn't do that.

This is a deeply disturbing question, at the end of the day.
Glad to see that...most...of the replies agree with me...although some of them are troubling.

Can't make up these rules that you might break some day. Make your way to a party one night and your really drunk by the end of it. Your not even a drinker, but you slam back a few just to fit in. Not really bugging anybody and your minding your own business. Really pretty girl starts kissing on your neck and you like it a whole lot. Pretty damn drunk and she wants to take it to her bedroom. Damn girl doesn't want to have sex. Girl says no, but your horny and drunk. Say you will never rape anybody, so did the people that said they would never get a DUI.

...I don't even know whether to take you seriously or not. So your saying that I should instead be saying 'yeah I might rape a child and murder it one day!'?
See, my morality is such that I would not rape anyone no matter how much I drink. I don't know what booze does to you, but it certainly doesn't destroy all my morals.
Add that on to the fact that I don't drink and your scenario is completely ridiculous. How dare you suggest that someone you don't even know would do that?

Also, the fact you're putting DUI and rape side by side is pretty idiotic too.

From seeing your post prior to your reply...it's clear to see you and I are worlds apart. You're saying that only laws are stopping you from murdering and raping people? You sicken me.

 

[aegix drakan_v1legacy]

No consequences, you say?

Siphon off a percentage of the profits of multi-billion dollar companies that don't really need it, and then redirect it to other stuff. Some of it would go to me, obviously. But I'd send the majority to stuff like cancer research or something like that.