Question time!
As we move into an exciting new technological future, with 3D printed organs and scientists teetering on the edge of puzzling out the riddle of cellular degradation, it becomes increasingly plausible that at some point in some of your lifetimes it might actually become possible to "live forever", or at the very least skirt around unavoidable causes of death like aging or organ failure.
The common consensus when it comes to questions of extreme longevity or functional immortality is that it's disastrous from a position of pragmatic concerns...overpopulation would ruin the planet inside of one or two generations.
However, if the use of age-defying technology came with the stipulation that you couldn't reproduce, would you?
Obviously accidents and certain diseases could still kill you. And you wouldn't be immune to the effects of boredom or ennui. You'd have to watch an element of the population age rapidly and die alongside you, whilst you and other technologically enabled people lived for (potentially) centuries.
Does that idea appeal? Would you abandon the idea of procreation to become "immortal"? How long do you think you'd want to go? What kind of problems might arise? Would centuries old citizens be a boon to society, or are we better off reproducing shorter-lived generations and improving genetically?
As we move into an exciting new technological future, with 3D printed organs and scientists teetering on the edge of puzzling out the riddle of cellular degradation, it becomes increasingly plausible that at some point in some of your lifetimes it might actually become possible to "live forever", or at the very least skirt around unavoidable causes of death like aging or organ failure.
The common consensus when it comes to questions of extreme longevity or functional immortality is that it's disastrous from a position of pragmatic concerns...overpopulation would ruin the planet inside of one or two generations.
However, if the use of age-defying technology came with the stipulation that you couldn't reproduce, would you?
Obviously accidents and certain diseases could still kill you. And you wouldn't be immune to the effects of boredom or ennui. You'd have to watch an element of the population age rapidly and die alongside you, whilst you and other technologically enabled people lived for (potentially) centuries.
Does that idea appeal? Would you abandon the idea of procreation to become "immortal"? How long do you think you'd want to go? What kind of problems might arise? Would centuries old citizens be a boon to society, or are we better off reproducing shorter-lived generations and improving genetically?