BoTTeNBReKeR said:
SOPA/PIPA/ACTA aren't about stopping piracy, they're about corporations wanting to control the internet. Nothing more, nothing less.
So would these bills exist without piracy? Yes, they would. They'd simply have another name. Like that child pornography bill.
Entirely agree, it'd just be a different acronym, and we'd be getting told it's about protecting our 'freedom' 'children' or 'way of life', and that it was NEEDED to prevent child abuse / terrorism / the drug trade.
I was very much with Frankie Boyle, pointing out the idiocy of the anti piracy ads.
'Pirated movies fund the illegal drug trade'
"you've gotta be kidding, you're saying you can't get repeat customers for your heroin, so you've moved into dodgy copies of harry potter?"
The entertainment industry is hurling it's toys out of the cot, because things aren't going exactly its own way, and it can't control everything.
While other people have moved with the times, certain industries are desperately trying to cling to the 80s.
It's been brought up before and I fully believe it.
Steam and iTunes have proved you can have limited and low hassle DRM and a simple sales mechanic and make money.
However, you have to balance the money you're throwing at fighting the ethereal evil pirates, with the amount they're REALLY costing you. As I've said before, imagine if a fraction of the SOPA bribery money had been spent on changing laws to open up the international markets so people could just buy what they wanted when they wanted it? TV and movie piracy slashed overnight, massive profits, but omg, a lessening of the iron grip of control they have.
SOPA is equivalent to calling in an airstrike on Walmart every time a shoplifter is caught.
Sure it's excessive punishment and wipes out a few hundred innocents, but hey, we stopped that guy stealing!
I personally think it'd be interesting to see everyone who's ever pirated anything take 3 months of not pirating and not buying anything that could be pirated. As it's been shown that pirates on average spend more than non pirates, taking away the revenue that pirates put into the industry may be an interesting financial quarter for them to explain to shareholders.
OF course, it'd just be explained that all those lost sales were 'stolen' anyway. Easier than facing up to having to change.