I didn't think it needed a qualifier, but I'll add "as far as we understand neurology, the human mind cannot cope with immortality."Liudeius said:There is absolutely no scientific information to back this statement up. Problems with immortality are all fictional.
That would be like saying "looping the pulse matrix plasma coils with a re-depolarization will cause an influx of sub-space energy and materialize a perfectly cooked hamburger" is fact just because it has shown up in fiction.
(and yes it has shown up in fiction. That sentence was a short story written by me right here and now ©present-4000.)
Until we have people living for millennia, it's not possible to accurately test it. What we do know about the human mind suggests that it would not cope with an infinite stream of information very well though.
It's certainly possible for it to be just fine, and there be no side-effects of processing several hundred thousand times more information than the average human (which is what we evolved for), it's just not terribly likely.