Poll: Invincible Or Immortal

Recommended Videos

Mochme

New member
Mar 17, 2010
22
0
0
I would say immortal cause i could kill my self when i get bored and if i was invincible if i lost all my limbs I would have to live with that with no way out!
 

Capt. Crankypants

New member
Jan 6, 2010
782
0
0
I'd choose immortality anyway, but however, just wondering if the proposed 'Invincibility' also equated to supernatural ability. If not, with all the dicking around you're likely to do, you'd probably spend alot of your un-natural life in a prison cell. Didn't think that through did we. Remember, even things like scaling and leaping off buildings is illegal. Not to the point where you'd be imprisoned for it, more like just a fine, but it's just an example. You're likely to want to do some weird shit knowing you couldnt be killed/feel pain.
 

airwolfe591

New member
Dec 11, 2009
175
0
0
Invincibility hands down, I don't mind the idea of growing old and in fact prefer that to anything else. I'd just like being invincible so I can do the most ridiculous stuff I could ever imagine and more. Remember the phrase, bringing a knife to a gun fight? I'd do it.
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,836
0
0
Invincible. I want to fight Bears with my own two hands!

[sub][sub]besides, living forever would be boring anyway[/sub][/sub]
 

Jewrean

New member
Jun 27, 2010
1,101
0
0
I chose Immortality under the condition that I can't die from starvation and disease. If I am indeed immortal in the way that you describe, then at any point I decide I want to throw in the towel I can ask someone to shoot me or whatever. I didn't choose invincibility because I don't live a dangerous life-style. It would be great to be immortal and see the world, there's so much to experience.
 

Kimarous

New member
Sep 23, 2009
2,011
0
0
Invincibility. Immortality is great until you get sick of life, but who can complain about a lack of injury?

I remember one time I concocted a wish for "Eternally youthful, physically impervious immortality that lasts until such a time that I grow weary of life and, with all my will, desire to surrender unto death." How's THAT for covering all my bases? (^_^)
 

elilupe

New member
Jun 1, 2009
533
0
0
Definately immortal. To see advances in technology and all that would be fantastic
 

Downfall89

New member
Aug 26, 2009
330
0
0
Prometheous said:
These two concepts are similar in that they both obviously avoid death in some way. Immortality takes death by old age out of the picture, while invincibility protects you from harm (for the purpose of this survey, invincibility does not protect from deterioration of cells. a.k.a old age).

So if you had to choose, would you live forever or live a life without injury (and why)?

P.S Trust me, I know the speed of your cells' independent degeneration is indicative of your invincible longevity so theoretically it doesn't make sense, but frankly neither of things are possible. So, which would it be?
Just a thought, if you are immortal, you still feel pain yes? And if you were invincible, likewise would you feel any pain?

OT: I'd probably want to be invincible. Life would get boring eventually.
 

Srkkl

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,152
0
0
Invincible, then I could live the greatest life of surviving a skydiving accident to getting the Congressional Medal of Honor.
 

FieryTrainwreck

New member
Apr 16, 2010
1,968
0
0
Immortality without some measure of invincibility or otherwise improved durability isn't immortality. Circumstances beyond your control will always have the power to end your life, and random chance determines when that may or may not happen. As an immortal you're rolling the same dice as everyone else - you're just doing it for a potentially longer period of time. Eventually you'll hit snake eyes, and a plane will crash into your house.

I'd choose invincibility because there's no chance I'd be cheated out of my gift.
 

Last Bullet

New member
Apr 28, 2010
538
0
0
Invincibility, no doubt. Immortality would get really depressing after a while. Plus, I would be the ultimate super-soldier. I'd use a nuke as a melee weapon. I guess the main reason I want to be invincible is... well, so I can be an idiot.
 

Dxz5roxg

New member
Aug 19, 2009
352
0
0
Invincibility would be so much better. If I was just immortal then I could be in some kind of horrible accident and end up just a disembodied head for millions of years.
 

Iron Lightning

Lightweight Extreme
Oct 19, 2009
1,237
0
0
Immortal, maybe if I lived long-enough I could invent a starman and fix my other problem. Music would get annoying though.
 

viking97

New member
Jan 23, 2010
858
0
0
blaze96 said:
Invincible, immortality comes with the very distinct disadvantage of living to see every friend, family member, or lover die before me. This is not just for a lifetime, but for all eternity should I never be killed by outside means. Not just my theoretical children, but grandchildren, great grandchildren, hell my entire family could die. I would also have to watch any friend I make in all of history die, and any girlfriends or wives I have as well. Immortality is really a slow torture, where either you have to suffer heartbreak and saddness again and again or you become a shut in at some point to avoid the pain. If you take option two, you are pretty much dead already. With invincibility, I can live a normal side life and still die at the same time as anyone else would be expected to. The child outliving the parent, rather than the other way around.
well actually, considering you invincible you'll probably outlive most everyone you know. think about it, you'd never get sick and no matter what happened you'd always be in perfect health. you would even be able to kill your self because, depending on what kinda of invincibility this is, the bullet will bounce off your fore head, or you'll just heal up and spit it out.

OT i'd probably immortality.
i say probably because it really depends on the details. if invincibility means i also get superhuman strength, then i pick that.
if immortality means i don't age physically past, oh- twenty three or somewhere around there and i don't die of illness then i'd pick that.
 

Sope

New member
Apr 29, 2010
10
0
0
I would pick invincible, because being immortal would be terrible. All the relationships you make would end in about a century and after a few centuries time, either all relationships you make will be hollow, or you might fall into crushing depression because everyone you ever know will die and leave you behind. Though, if other people were immortal too, then maybe immortal.
 

RadiusXd

New member
Jun 2, 2010
743
0
0
well, immortal means that you'll never die, so really what you mean by that is either ageless or just protected from death by old age.
invincible means you can't be harmed, so you can't experience pain or recive damage.
i would choose immortal if it meant eternal youth as well, looking like charlie buckets grandparents for all eternity telling people that they smell like peanuts would be the very definition of miserable existance.

One other important question, would i be able to have hairhuts and shave and stuff if i were invincible? i think the importance of that can't be overstated.
 

Piorn

New member
Dec 26, 2007
1,097
0
0
Immortal. As long as I can still die when the world ends, it's fine with me.
 
Sep 17, 2009
2,851
0
0
Aby_Z said:
Invincible. Living forever would be worse than any hell.
This. I would never want to outlive everyone I knew. Imagine the horror of watching everyone you love die while you sit and wait as the world become more and more unfamiliar.

I'd much rather be able to be invincible and live through an accident.