In human math! Maybe somewhere else the symbol 2 stands for our two and one half.JenXXXJen said:While I'm generally a "never say never" person, the cynic in me says you can't make 2+2=5 :/
In human math! Maybe somewhere else the symbol 2 stands for our two and one half.JenXXXJen said:While I'm generally a "never say never" person, the cynic in me says you can't make 2+2=5 :/
Forget linguistics.Shankity Stick said:In human math! Maybe somewhere else the symbol 2 stands for our two and one half.JenXXXJen said:While I'm generally a "never say never" person, the cynic in me says you can't make 2+2=5 :/
Fine, you want me to make a real argument, Here's one for you. We simply perceive that logic works. Maybe it really doesn?t work on a planet that sees thing clearer then us. WHO KNOWS!SakSak said:How would magic disprove logic?Shankity Stick said:MAGIC. Magic makes anything possible; I just haven't been using it as evidence yet. From now on, magic is my answer, because there is no possible way to disprove it.SakSak said:And yet another impossibility:
It is impossible to prove that logic does not work.
Because how would you go about proving that, without using logic in the process?
Because when you make the step "magic makes anything possible, therefore anything can happen" you have used logic.
Thereby proving logic.
We can only make laws about what we observe. Our laws do not and cannot pertain to other universes because we can't observe them to make such a claim. Even when you use this magical machine to view other universes and we would see either "wow, their laws are the same as ours, high 5th dimension" or say "Well in our universe A gravity attracts but in universe 1 they repel....weird". This is why I was using that example. Because the laws do not pertain to each other thus you can't be prosecuted for it. Say I was stupid enough to live in Indiana and go to Illinois to do it. I can (and probably will) be extradited to Illinois for prosecution because I broke the law there, not in Indiana(even if the age of consent was 17 in Indiana).Shankity Stick said:You are right. We can't see other dimensions...yet. For all we know there is a machine in development right now that allows us to see said dimension, allowing us to see our laws being broken. Also, your hypothetical about your girlfriend is bad because you CAN f**k her in Illinois, you would just be punished.
Then let me challenge you to disprove logic or even imagine any possible concept or an object that disproves logic.Shoggoth2588 said:Yes: absolutely anything and everything is possible.
Sure I can. 2.4+2.4=4.8 (truncate/round) 2+2=5JenXXXJen said:While I'm generally a "never say never" person, the cynic in me says you can't make 2+2=5 :/
Logic is seperate from perception, and from reality. It does not matter what planet it is, what language they speak, what physical laws, if any, they have. It is impossible to get rid of logical absolutes. Because if they make an inference between an observation and a conclusion, they have used logic.Shankity Stick said:Fine, you want me to make a real argument, Here's one for you. We simply perceive that logic works. Maybe it really doesn?t work on a planet that sees thing clearer then us. WHO KNOWS!Thereby proving logic.
First of all, what you just described is 2+=5. But enough nit picking. Maybe math is simply a nonexistent concept cooked up by some foolish species to impose order into their meaningless lives. Maybe math just exists in our minds because we choose to view the world in that way. I don't know, but it makes for an interesting conversation.SakSak said:Forget linguistics.Shankity Stick said:In human math! Maybe somewhere else the symbol 2 stands for our two and one half.JenXXXJen said:While I'm generally a "never say never" person, the cynic in me says you can't make 2+2=5 :/
What of the concepts? where would the concept that we call two, combined with the concept we call addition, equal the concept we call five.
Concepts are not limited to language, because language is at it's root about communicating concepts. Concepts are not defined by language, it is the other way around.
Incorrect, because mathematics is formalized logic.Shankity Stick said:First of all, what you just described is 2+=5. But enough nit picking. Maybe math is simply a nonexistent concept cooked up by some foolish species to impose order into their meaningless lives. Maybe math just exists in our minds because we choose to view the world in that way. I don't know, but it makes for an interesting conversation.SakSak said:Forget linguistics.Shankity Stick said:In human math! Maybe somewhere else the symbol 2 stands for our two and one half.JenXXXJen said:While I'm generally a "never say never" person, the cynic in me says you can't make 2+2=5 :/
What of the concepts? where would the concept that we call two, combined with the concept we call addition, equal the concept we call five.
Concepts are not limited to language, because language is at it's root about communicating concepts. Concepts are not defined by language, it is the other way around.
You just quoted me as saying something that you said. That, my friend, is cheating.crudus said:We can only make laws about what we observe. Our laws do not and cannot pertain to other universes because we can't observe them to make such a claim. Even when you use this magical machine to view other universes and we would see either "wow, their laws are the same as ours, high 5th dimension" or say "Well in our universe A gravity attracts but in universe 1 they repel....weird". This is why I was using that example. Because the laws do not pertain to each other thus you can't be prosecuted for it. Say I was stupid enough to live in Indiana and go to Illinois to do it. I can (and probably will) be extradited to Illinois for prosecution because I broke the law there, not in Indiana(even if the age of consent was 17 in Indiana).Shankity Stick said:You are right. We can't see other dimensions...yet. For all we know there is a machine in development right now that allows us to see said dimension, allowing us to see our laws being broken. Also, your hypothetical about your girlfriend is bad because you CAN f**k her in Illinois, you would just be punished.
No, math is very logic based. I may say it is even simpler than that(but I won't). Just going on the concepts by using language: if you have one of something and you get another you have two of that something. No matter how you look at it that will always be true.Shankity Stick said:First of all, what you just described is 2+=5. But enough nit picking. Maybe math is simply a nonexistent concept cooked up by some foolish species to impose order into their meaningless lives. Maybe math just exists in our minds because we choose to view the world in that way. I don't know, but it makes for an interesting conversation.
Yeah, photoshop is great isn't it?ThePostalDude said:Alot of human history is achieving the impossible.
...SakSak said:Then let me challenge you to disprove logic or even imagine any possible concept or an object that disproves logic.Shoggoth2588 said:Yes: absolutely anything and everything is possible.
Because the only way you can even in theory disprove logic, is by using logic at some stage. Thereby creating a self-referential loop which is not proof of anything. Thereby failing to disprove logic.