DigitalAtlas said:
What the ****.... What the ACTUAL ****.... Wow.
Okay. Normally people try to compare games that are at least vaguely similar. But an indie hack-n-slash with a cel-shaded art style being pressed up against a realistic and logical science fiction cover shooter RPG? Are you THAT bitter over ME3's ending you need to compare it to BASTION? What's next? We're going to compare it with the ending to Metroid Prime because we could choose how much we compl... Actually, that one works as far as the GR is concerned. While that was accidental, this is like comparing the ending of Super Mario Bros with Mass Effect 3.
Why? Because it wasn't JUST the choice. Bastion didn't have choices throughout the game, let alone ones that affected the entire story. Mass Effect had an ENTIRE SERIES to close on. It's not the same. At all.
I know you're new, but stick to comparing games that are similar. Like, if you wanted to compare The Witcher 2 (still not really...) to Mass Effect 3, I'd engage.
Also, should make the poll equate to the question your thread is asking.
Of course you can compare the two. It's easy as can be.
You take the feeling you had after being done with one game and compare it to the feeling you had after being done with another game.
It's a totally subjective comparison, but guess what the OP is asking for?
If that's not scientific enough for you then I direct you to the economic concept of opportunity cost [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunity_cost]. Using that we can even compare Mass Effect 3's ending to eating at a restaurant!
You can literally compare almost anything to almost everything else! And guess what our brains are constantly doing? With every choice we make we're comparing all kinds of crazy shit!