Well down here the law is a bit funny. If you screw an animal then its illegal as the animal has not shown consent but if the animal screws you then its legal as the animal has shown that it is willing. Thus guys f@#k's sheep he gets charged but dog bones girl is totally ok apparently. Well that's what I got told anyway, I hope its true because its funny and funny things should be true
That's what I'm trying to work out now 0_0. I really hope there are taboos left. Life would be boring if there weren't a few rules left that post modernism hadn't raped.
Animals cannot give consent in this matter. And other than that, it's a vile act.
EDIT: I'm going to quote a guy, so pardon the language
*Ahem*
they will claim that their dog (or other animal) "consents" to being fucked in the ass. I disagree. Until your dog can speak forth an English sentence consenting to being fucked in the ass, your dog does not consent to being fucked in the ass, you sick ************. Another rationalisation often used is that the animal "just came onto me". "It was his idea!" they will say - if a dog starts licking your balls, your dog is broken and should be put down and so should you.
Of course you're absolutely correct that an animal can't consent.
Perhaps what's more alarming though, is that whether or not you perceive it to be a "vile" act has really any bearing on the morality of this issue. After all, many people still consider homosexuality to be "vile" and therefore "wrong".
I don't care if they don't want me comparing the two. The truth is, they share a common problem, and THAT is undeniable. The source of all bigotry is disgust.
I can name about a dozen things that disgust me that no sane person would try to argue with me about.
Fact of the matter is, if detesting and despising people who want to have sex with animals makes me a biggot, then so be it. I'll gladly be called that if it means I oppose this kinda sick shit.
Years ago, people would've said the exact same thing about homosexuals. Face it, the only real justification you have for hating the act is because it's both harmful to the animal and non-consensual (not mutually exclusive). Whether or not you find something "sick" is irrelevant, and issues like homosexuality have proven this. You are never justified in hating something if the hate lies in disgust alone.
That's what I'm trying to work out now 0_0. I really hope there are taboos left. Life would be boring if there weren't a few rules left that post modernism hadn't raped.
Animals cannot give consent in this matter. And other than that, it's a vile act.
EDIT: I'm going to quote a guy, so pardon the language
*Ahem*
they will claim that their dog (or other animal) "consents" to being fucked in the ass. I disagree. Until your dog can speak forth an English sentence consenting to being fucked in the ass, your dog does not consent to being fucked in the ass, you sick ************. Another rationalisation often used is that the animal "just came onto me". "It was his idea!" they will say - if a dog starts licking your balls, your dog is broken and should be put down and so should you.
Of course you're absolutely correct that an animal can't consent.
Perhaps what's more alarming though, is that whether or not you perceive it to be a "vile" act has really any bearing on the morality of this issue. After all, many people still consider homosexuality to be "vile" and therefore "wrong".
I don't care if they don't want me comparing the two. The truth is, they share a common problem, and THAT is undeniable. The source of all bigotry is disgust.
I can name about a dozen things that disgust me that no sane person would try to argue with me about.
Fact of the matter is, if detesting and despising people who want to have sex with animals makes me a biggot, then so be it. I'll gladly be called that if it means I oppose this kinda sick shit.
Hear Hear!! I'm drawing my line somewhere!
I got no problem with Gay People doing it, that's their thing.
However Incest is a No go for me and so is beastiality. The moment you start gambling with the Genes and other species is the moment I'm out
Hell let's just have sex with appliances while we're at it.....*Looks at Cake Mixer*...umm
On Second thought, I think the point stands that humans will fuck anything.
Animals cannot give consent in this matter. And other than that, it's a vile act.
EDIT: I'm going to quote a guy, so pardon the language
*Ahem*
they will claim that their dog (or other animal) "consents" to being fucked in the ass. I disagree. Until your dog can speak forth an English sentence consenting to being fucked in the ass, your dog does not consent to being fucked in the ass, you sick ************. Another rationalisation often used is that the animal "just came onto me". "It was his idea!" they will say - if a dog starts licking your balls, your dog is broken and should be put down and so should you.
Of course you're absolutely correct that an animal can't consent.
Perhaps what's more alarming though, is that whether or not you perceive it to be a "vile" act has really any bearing on the morality of this issue. After all, many people still consider homosexuality to be "vile" and therefore "wrong".
I don't care if they don't want me comparing the two. The truth is, they share a common problem, and THAT is undeniable. The source of all bigotry is disgust.
I can name about a dozen things that disgust me that no sane person would try to argue with me about.
Fact of the matter is, if detesting and despising people who want to have sex with animals makes me a biggot, then so be it. I'll gladly be called that if it means I oppose this kinda sick shit.
Years ago, people would've said the exact same thing about homosexuals. Face it, the only real justification you have for hating the act is because it's both harmful to the animal and non-consensual (not mutually exclusive). Whether or not you find something "sick" is irrelevant, and issues like homosexuality have proven this. You are never justified in hating something if the hate lies in disgust alone.
You've missed my point. I don't just hate it because it's sick. It's a harmful, illegal, and rape-like act. AN ANIMAL CANNOT GIVE CONSENT. There is a reason why so many people find this act twisted. You are not going to get many people behind the "Legalize Man/Goat love" banner.
But go on. Compare GLBT issues to people who have sex with animals. That's great. I'll just sit back in my chair, laughing that anyone could try to justify this
At the end of the day, I'm not the one trying to justify animal sex. And you are. I think, dear reader, that means I win.
Animals cannot give consent in this matter. And other than that, it's a vile act.
EDIT: I'm going to quote a guy, so pardon the language
*Ahem*
they will claim that their dog (or other animal) "consents" to being fucked in the ass. I disagree. Until your dog can speak forth an English sentence consenting to being fucked in the ass, your dog does not consent to being fucked in the ass, you sick ************. Another rationalisation often used is that the animal "just came onto me". "It was his idea!" they will say - if a dog starts licking your balls, your dog is broken and should be put down and so should you.
Darn my cat only speaks mandarin... It's a joke!! You should probably say any known "translatable language" English,Español,Latin,Braille,etc. or undiscovered Alien language(s).
Though yeah till it can be determined a particular "animal" can understand a form of communication beyond mimicry and expresses personal opinions any attempt to claim consent should probably be considered as unfounded claims. (My personal ethical issues aside.)
That's something you take up with your faith and considering some people don't believe in Deities.
However If I remember Greek Mythology well, F*cking a God never ever turned out for the best.....EVER
And the Bible...The Virgin Mary is a mind boggler for me and well I would hope God wouldn't do that to a woman without consent....*HEAD DESK* WTF am I discussing this for!?!?
There's no justification to f*cking another species...NOT EVEN SCIENCE!!
It's more likely that the deity will be coming to fuck you.
OT: I want to say no, but cross-species consent isn't something that I want to touch with a 39-and-a-half-foot pole. Consent in and of itself needs a legal redefining. An 18 year old can consent to sex with a 40 year old, but a 17 year old can't consent with a 25 year old.
That's what I'm trying to work out now 0_0. I really hope there are taboos left. Life would be boring if there weren't a few rules left that post modernism hadn't raped.
LOL aside from the blatantly obvious ones. I meant taboos in the sexual realm. I mean I could care less if two guys or girls are going at, but when we try and put consent with an Animal or even a Toaster oven...(Don't think too hard on that one) then shit gets Bonkers fast
Animals cannot give consent in this matter. And other than that, it's a vile act.
EDIT: I'm going to quote a guy, so pardon the language
*Ahem*
they will claim that their dog (or other animal) "consents" to being fucked in the ass. I disagree. Until your dog can speak forth an English sentence consenting to being fucked in the ass, your dog does not consent to being fucked in the ass, you sick ************. Another rationalisation often used is that the animal "just came onto me". "It was his idea!" they will say - if a dog starts licking your balls, your dog is broken and should be put down and so should you.
Of course you're absolutely correct that an animal can't consent.
Perhaps what's more alarming though, is that whether or not you perceive it to be a "vile" act has really any bearing on the morality of this issue. After all, many people still consider homosexuality to be "vile" and therefore "wrong".
I don't care if they don't want me comparing the two. The truth is, they share a common problem, and THAT is undeniable. The source of all bigotry is disgust.
I can name about a dozen things that disgust me that no sane person would try to argue with me about.
Fact of the matter is, if detesting and despising people who want to have sex with animals makes me a biggot, then so be it. I'll gladly be called that if it means I oppose this kinda sick shit.
Years ago, people would've said the exact same thing about homosexuals. Face it, the only real justification you have for hating the act is because it's both harmful to the animal and non-consensual (not mutually exclusive). Whether or not you find something "sick" is irrelevant, and issues like homosexuality have proven this. You are never justified in hating something if the hate lies in disgust alone.
You've missed my point. I don't just hate it because it's sick. It's a harmful, illegal, and rape-like act. AN ANIMAL CANNOT GIVE CONSENT. There is a reason why so many people find this act twisted. You are not going to get many people behind the "Legalize Man/Goat love" banner.
But go on. Compare GLBT issues to people who have sex with animals. That's great. I'll just sit back in my chair, laughing that anyone could try to justify this
No, you've got justification. I never said you didn't, and I never said I was trying to defend Bestiality. What I'M trying to prevent is people having positions that are solely based on disgust. You've pointed out your reasoning, and its time to move on. When I see threads like these, involving deviant behaviors, I often feel like there's some kind of hypocrisy going on. One minute all these people are bashing the bigots for being irrational, then support a position based in irrationality.
You've already proven that your position isn't irrational.
That's what I'm trying to work out now 0_0. I really hope there are taboos left. Life would be boring if there weren't a few rules left that post modernism hadn't raped.
LOL aside from the blatantly obvious ones. I meant taboos in the sexual realm. I mean I could care less if two guys or girls are going at, but when we try and put consent with an Animal or even a Toaster oven...(Don't think too hard on that one) then shit gets Bonkers fast
Animals cannot give consent in this matter. And other than that, it's a vile act.
EDIT: I'm going to quote a guy, so pardon the language
*Ahem*
they will claim that their dog (or other animal) "consents" to being fucked in the ass. I disagree. Until your dog can speak forth an English sentence consenting to being fucked in the ass, your dog does not consent to being fucked in the ass, you sick ************. Another rationalisation often used is that the animal "just came onto me". "It was his idea!" they will say - if a dog starts licking your balls, your dog is broken and should be put down and so should you.
Of course you're absolutely correct that an animal can't consent.
Perhaps what's more alarming though, is that whether or not you perceive it to be a "vile" act has really any bearing on the morality of this issue. After all, many people still consider homosexuality to be "vile" and therefore "wrong".
I don't care if they don't want me comparing the two. The truth is, they share a common problem, and THAT is undeniable. The source of all bigotry is disgust.
I can name about a dozen things that disgust me that no sane person would try to argue with me about.
Fact of the matter is, if detesting and despising people who want to have sex with animals makes me a biggot, then so be it. I'll gladly be called that if it means I oppose this kinda sick shit.
Years ago, people would've said the exact same thing about homosexuals. Face it, the only real justification you have for hating the act is because it's both harmful to the animal and non-consensual (not mutually exclusive). Whether or not you find something "sick" is irrelevant, and issues like homosexuality have proven this. You are never justified in hating something if the hate lies in disgust alone.
You've missed my point. I don't just hate it because it's sick. It's a harmful, illegal, and rape-like act. AN ANIMAL CANNOT GIVE CONSENT. There is a reason why so many people find this act twisted. You are not going to get many people behind the "Legalize Man/Goat love" banner.
But go on. Compare GLBT issues to people who have sex with animals. That's great. I'll just sit back in my chair, laughing that anyone could try to justify this
No, you've got justification. I never said you didn't, and I never said I was trying to defend Bestiality. What I'M trying to prevent is people having positions that are solely based on disgust. You've pointed out your reasoning, and its time to move on. When I see threads like these, involving deviant behaviors, I often feel like there's some kind of hypocrisy going on. One minute all these people are bashing the bigots for being irrational, then support a position based in irrationality.
You've already proven that your position isn't irrational.
Ah, I see your point then. Very well.
*Tips hat*
Good day, sir.
EDIT:I think this is a tough issue to talk about because animals cannot give consent the same way humans can.
That's what I'm trying to work out now 0_0. I really hope there are taboos left. Life would be boring if there weren't a few rules left that post modernism hadn't raped.
LOL aside from the blatantly obvious ones. I meant taboos in the sexual realm. I mean I could care less if two guys or girls are going at, but when we try and put consent with an Animal or even a Toaster oven...(Don't think too hard on that one) then shit gets Bonkers fast
Exactly the point. No consent from at least one party = Rape.
Majority rule does not apply in the sex realm......Still don't think too hard on that one.
Animals cannot give consent in this matter. And other than that, it's a vile act.
EDIT: I'm going to quote a guy, so pardon the language
*Ahem*
they will claim that their dog (or other animal) "consents" to being fucked in the ass. I disagree. Until your dog can speak forth an English sentence consenting to being fucked in the ass, your dog does not consent to being fucked in the ass, you sick ************. Another rationalisation often used is that the animal "just came onto me". "It was his idea!" they will say - if a dog starts licking your balls, your dog is broken and should be put down and so should you.
Of course you're absolutely correct that an animal can't consent.
Perhaps what's more alarming though, is that whether or not you perceive it to be a "vile" act has really any bearing on the morality of this issue. After all, many people still consider homosexuality to be "vile" and therefore "wrong".
I don't care if they don't want me comparing the two. The truth is, they share a common problem, and THAT is undeniable. The source of all bigotry is disgust.
I can name about a dozen things that disgust me that no sane person would try to argue with me about.
Fact of the matter is, if detesting and despising people who want to have sex with animals makes me a biggot, then so be it. I'll gladly be called that if it means I oppose this kinda sick shit.
Years ago, people would've said the exact same thing about homosexuals. Face it, the only real justification you have for hating the act is because it's both harmful to the animal and non-consensual (not mutually exclusive). Whether or not you find something "sick" is irrelevant, and issues like homosexuality have proven this. You are never justified in hating something if the hate lies in disgust alone.
You've missed my point. I don't just hate it because it's sick. It's a harmful, illegal, and rape-like act. AN ANIMAL CANNOT GIVE CONSENT. There is a reason why so many people find this act twisted. You are not going to get many people behind the "Legalize Man/Goat love" banner.
But go on. Compare GLBT issues to people who have sex with animals. That's great. I'll just sit back in my chair, laughing that anyone could try to justify this
No, you've got justification. I never said you didn't, and I never said I was trying to defend Bestiality. What I'M trying to prevent is people having positions that are solely based on disgust. You've pointed out your reasoning, and its time to move on. When I see threads like these, involving deviant behaviors, I often feel like there's some kind of hypocrisy going on. One minute all these people are bashing the bigots for being irrational, then support a position based in irrationality.
You've already proven that your position isn't irrational.
Ah, I see your point then. Very well.
*Tips hat*
Good day, sir.
EDIT:I think this is a tough issue to talk about because animals cannot give consent the same way humans can.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
