Poll: Is EA refusing to have ME3 on steam going to change anything?

Recommended Videos

GoaThief

Reinventing the Spiel
Feb 2, 2012
1,229
0
0
Draech said:
I recently purchased Crysis 2 during the Steam summer sale for 75% or something similar, so you cannot be correct.

I can't imagine EA would have allowed Crysis 2 to be put on sale if they weren't kosher with Valve either.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Politeia said:
I'm not sure what you're trying to get at;
That their anti-EA stance does not translate into anything meaningful. That they might be anti-EA is one thing, but you said they were looking for a chance to dick over EA, and they didn't do that. EA sells awesome on Steam, Mass Effect 3 and other Origin-exclusive titles still sell good (Awesome in the case of ME3), and literally nothing's changed except the fanboys are running two invasive DRM clients instead of one.

It is, to borrow from some old dead dude, the tale of an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Consumers are excessively vocal these days, but completely unwilling to inconvenience themselves in any way imaginable. This is why the call of "boycott" is so meaningless these days; instead of boycotting the product, people scream loudly then buy it quietly.

There was a lot of sound and fury once about a little client called Steam. most of the things people say about Origin now were once said about Steam. And people bought the Steam-mandatory games anyway, and Steam became an incredible asset for Valve because nobody wanted to give up their precious games. And Origins, even if it sucks, stands to do the same, because nobody wants to give up their precious games.
 

Dendio

New member
Mar 24, 2010
701
0
0
shrekfan246 said:
The "start"? The "start" was back when they pulled Crysis 2 off of Steam because they were trying to push Origin forward. Besides, Mass Effect 3 is almost five months old now, which likely means that EA doesn't care about it anymore.

I'm tempted to ask if the OP has been living under a rock all of this time... :D
Except EA/Bioware has been supporting the game with 3 multiplayer dlc's, single player extended cut and on going Bi weekly Operations. We have two more single player dlc's to be released in the imminent future and most likely multiplayer dlc through christmas.

Mass effect support has been awesome, and almost all of the dlc has been free

By the way mass effect 3 release on Wii U during christmas with new scenes that give back ground on the past two games for new players.
 

shrekfan246

Not actually a Japanese pop star
May 26, 2011
6,374
0
0
Dendio said:
This thread was resurrected again? Sheesh.

They're releasing single-player DLC? Apart from "Leviathan", that's the first I've heard of it. Besides, I never said anything decrying Mass Effect 3, I merely said that EA probably doesn't care about sales figures for it anymore. Not to say they don't encourage people to buy it still, but when it comes to "ultimate sales figures!" time, they're not going to say "Oh, Mass Effect 3 sold [however many millions of copies] over the last half a year", they're probably going to say "Oh, it sold [however many millions of copies] in the first three months".

Bioware is still supporting Mass Effect 3. That doesn't mean EA still cares about it.
 

kingthrall

New member
May 31, 2011
811
0
0
Well If I liked Mass effect 3 (not the game itself) but for starters I would care. Because of Origin being the platform compulsory to run it and to violate your privacy. This would probably leave steam and MA3 incompatible regardless.

Its no big issue, it works in Steam advantage actually as they are the big shots when it comes to online game downloads and by not having EA software they simply isolating their competitors away from publicity.