Poll: Is food better than sex?

Recommended Videos

Andronicus

Terror Australis
Mar 25, 2009
1,846
0
0
There's a sort of annual tradition in Australia where a couple of comedians get together and debate a particular topic in front of a live audience. I don't know if there's anything comparable in other countries, but it's great fun down here and they're about halfway through this year's, the topic being whether or not food is better than sex. I can't watch it all right now, as Sanctuary is about to start on another channel and damned if I'm going to miss that, so I'll finish watching the debate later on the recorder

Anyways, I thought I might ask the Escapist's opinion on the matter: what really is better? Food or sex?

Too minor notes:
1) Search bar approved
2) Let's try and keep it, err, relatively clean. I do hope the topic itself won't get me a probation. My logic is that if it's good enough for Monday night Aussie telly, it's probably good enough for the internet.
 

Explosm

New member
Oct 4, 2009
334
0
0
Nah, sex is easily better. I go by the saying eat to live not live to eat

And i bet theres about 50 comments saying 'i hasnt had a sex sadface'
 

Darth_Dude

New member
Jul 11, 2008
1,302
0
0
I need food to survive, so...yes.

Sex is like an added bonus to life, people can live without it.
 

ZephrC

Free Cascadia!
Mar 9, 2010
750
0
0
Well, I've had both, and I'd have to say food is better. In fact, I might go as far as to say that I'd just die without food.

That being said, the two aren't mutually exclusive...
 

Katherine Kerensky

Why, or Why Not?
Mar 27, 2009
7,744
0
0
Food is necessary for life to continue, sex isn't...
Sure, sex is necessary for a species to continue, but we could remove sex from our lives, and the species could continue through other methods.
Food beats sex, any day.
Plus, I don't think you'd catch a rather nasty STD from a hamburger...
 

Vhite

New member
Aug 17, 2009
1,980
0
0
You cant live without food, others can take care about population. :p
 

Badong

New member
May 26, 2010
373
0
0
It depends on the occasion really. I won't have sex if I'm really hungry, and I wouldn't go to Burger King if I was horny (unless of course if I want to bugger a greasy sandwich) .
 

Frequen-Z

Resident Batman fanatic.
Apr 22, 2009
1,351
0
0
Bad sex is still good sex, but bad food is not good food.

So, I voted sex.
 

troth

New member
Jun 8, 2009
356
0
0
Greyfox105 said:
I don't think you'd catch a rather nasty STD from a hamburger...
Have you eaten at McDonald's lately? [small]Oh snap[/small]

OT: Being a fuck-ugly, mentally ill social reject, (Yes, I'm a wee bit depressed right now) I think it's safe to say that I will never indulge in a sexual act without an exchange of currency. Therefore: food it is. Bring on the curry's.
 

Betancore

New member
Apr 23, 2010
1,857
0
0
I'd prefer to never have sex again than be without food, good or bad. Because not having food would be kind of...you know, detrimental to my ability to survive. I guess sex can be better than food and vice versa, just depends on the quality of both.
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
Well, the concept of sex has never really turned me on, and I'm rather nerdish and unattractive, so I'll say food is better.
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
Define 'Better'.

Better in terms of fun? Sex wins.
Better in terms of health? Sex is actually really good for you (and is a human need), but food sorta makes you not die.

Depends on the terms of the question.