he's definitely worse than tony blair. i don't see him being able to adapt, and his public image is nothing short of woeful. to reiterate earlier points, he is not a natural PM, and this is most obvious to us the general public, in his appalling lack of media savvy. however, brown is a relatively honest prime minister (compared to blair and the probable future PM, david cameron) so i do have sympathy for him. the economic crisis is affecting everyone, and people who just blame the authority are either hilariously misinformed, or fucking morons.
the problem i have is this:
how should we know if david cameron is better or worse than gordon brown? after the initial optimism and rejuvenation of a new PM, who's to say he'll handle this any better? who's to say he won't make it worse? no-one can say, because he hasn't come out with any goddamn policies.
EDIT: is he better or worse? yes.