Poll: Is it better to let a criminal go free, or to let an innocent get convicted?

Recommended Videos

moretimethansense

New member
Apr 10, 2008
1,617
0
0
crudus said:
I may not understand the question. I vote that it is better to convict an innocent person than let a criminal go free. However people are innocent until proven guilty. I am not understanding why both of these questions are being asked in the same breath.
Basicly would you rather innocent people get convicted for crimes they didn't commit but catch more actual criminals.
Or actual criminals get away with it to reduce the chance of an innocent being convicted.
 

crudus

New member
Oct 20, 2008
4,415
0
0
moretimethansense said:
crudus said:
I may not understand the question. I vote that it is better to convict an innocent person than let a criminal go free. However people are innocent until proven guilty. I am not understanding why both of these questions are being asked in the same breath.
Basicly would you rather innocent people get convicted for crimes they didn't commit but catch more actual criminals.
Or actual criminals get away with it to reduce the chance of an innocent being convicted.
I am just confused since it looks like OP is asking two questions but passing them off as one.
 

moretimethansense

New member
Apr 10, 2008
1,617
0
0
crudus said:
moretimethansense said:
crudus said:
I may not understand the question. I vote that it is better to convict an innocent person than let a criminal go free. However people are innocent until proven guilty. I am not understanding why both of these questions are being asked in the same breath.
Basicly would you rather innocent people get convicted for crimes they didn't commit but catch more actual criminals.
Or actual criminals get away with it to reduce the chance of an innocent being convicted.
I am just confused since it looks like OP is asking two questions but passing them off as one.
Ah, I see what you mean now, I didn't notice that, I must be tired normally I'd have been all over that myself.
 

Gigano

Whose Eyes Are Those Eyes?
Oct 15, 2009
2,281
0
0
The most fundamental principle in criminal justice is that anyone is innocent until proven otherwise; Convict an innocent and the system is no better than the criminals which harm innocents. It becomes a threat to those it's set down to protect, and thus fail at most fundamental level.

Better an imperfect justice system than a ruthlessly unjust one.
 

ace_of_something

New member
Sep 19, 2008
5,995
0
0
It's amazing how many people here are basing what reasonable doubt it off of TV shows. (Though they seem very unaware of it)

As a police officer and detective; Innocent until proven guilty. If I thought the other way around I'd never get anything done and would always be collaring the first witness I talk to in a case.

The thing is the amount of evidence it takes to even get to a trial is pretty hefty in serious cases anymore.
 

Kinguendo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
4,267
0
0
Xavier78 said:
So what a lot of people are saying is that it's better to risk the murderer/rapist go free, then have an innocent man sit in prison? I heartily disagree with that, sorry. I'd rather risk his/her freedom then risk lives.
Would you heartily disagree if it were YOUR freedom? Pretty sure you wouldnt.

And convicting an innocent person of a crime means the actual criminal remains free, so either way a criminal will be free... but in the choice you made there is now an innocent suffering in prison too.
 
May 5, 2010
4,831
0
0
Huh. The Escapist surprises me. I thought you cynical fucks would be all for frying innocents in the name of security.[footnote]Not 100% serious[/footnote]

Besides, as others have said, it's kind of a dumb question. If an innocent is convicted, then a criminal went free anyway.
 

AngryPuppy

New member
Feb 18, 2010
262
0
0
Kinguendo said:
Xavier78 said:
So what a lot of people are saying is that it's better to risk the murderer/rapist go free, then have an innocent man sit in prison? I heartily disagree with that, sorry. I'd rather risk his/her freedom then risk lives.
Would you heartily disagree if it were YOUR freedom? Pretty sure you wouldnt.

And convicting an innocent person of a crime means the actual criminal remains free, so either way a criminal will be free... but in the choice you made there is now an innocent suffering in prison too.
Well I guess I didn't think about the criminal going free if the innocent went to prison. Lack of foresight on my part.