Is it still piracy if you buy the game but you install the crack that removes the DRM? I personally do not think so as you have still purchased the game. I know it still counts as copyright, but what do you personally think about this matter?
I hope that GOG expands and increases its library of no-DRM quality games.mekose said:I've had to do this with Ubisoft games before (Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands). I don't know any legalities in the matter but I don't think there is any moral problems. Actually, being forced to do stuff like this just pisses me off and makes me not want to buy any more games from publishers that do this sort of stuff. Especially considering I bought it off steam so I have a proof of purchase and DRM already there.
Well, in europe these EULA's are invalid as they are only allowed to be one page on a monitor screen and in general they are several pages and you have to scroll, which makes them invalid, too.Giest4life said:I don't know if it's piracy or not, but I don't see anything wrong with you cracking a game that you bought. Although people will always bring up the ToS and the EULA agreements.
Well...lacktheknack said:I don't know whether it's legal in Canada or not...
[a href="http://www.themarknews.com/articles/1667-how-balanced-is-bill-c-32"]Source[/a]Graham Reynolds said:TPMs (technological protection measures), sometimes referred to as "digital locks," are technological measures that allow copyright owners to restrict access to and/or use of copyright-protected expression. Bill C-32 makes it an offence to circumvent a TPM which controls access to a work, a performer's performance fixed in a sound recording, or a sound recording. It also makes it an offence to offer or provide services or devices to the public that are "primarily for the purposes of circumventing a technological protection measure" (provided that certain other criteria are satisfied). Certain narrowly-circumscribed limitations to these offences are built into the bill. It is not an offence, for instance, to circumvent a TPM for the purpose of national security. In many instances, however, an individual could commit an offence by circumventing a TPM to do something that the individual has the right to do under the Copyright Act.
Thanks a lot Harper...Bill C-32 said:41.1 (1) No person shall
(a) circumvent a technological protection measure within the meaning of paragraph (a) of the definition ?technological protection measure? in section 41;
(b) offer services to the public or provide services if
(i) the services are offered or provided primarily for the purposes of circumventing a technological protection measure,
(ii) the uses or purposes of those services are not commercially significant other than when they are offered or provided for the purposes of circumventing a technological protection measure, or
(iii) the person markets those services as being for the purposes of circumventing a technological protection measure or acts in concert with another person in order to market those services as being for those purposes; or
(c) manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale or rental or provide ? including by selling or renting ? any technology, device or component if
(i) the technology, device or component is designed or produced primarily for the purposes of circumventing a technological protection measure,
(ii) the uses or purposes of the technology, device or component are not commercially significant other than when it is used for the purposes of circumventing a technolog- ical protection measure, or
(iii) the person markets the technology, device or component as being for the purposes of circumventing a technological protection measure or acts in concert with another person in order to market the technology, device or component as being for those purposes.