Poll: Is physical fighting pointless??

Recommended Videos

enzilewulf

New member
Jun 19, 2009
2,130
0
0
Okay on frieday in class a fight started just because of a few harsh words, and no teen can seem to just take the high road and be the bigger person. Honostly this fight was stupid they just started off by calling names and the next thing the teachers yelling and telling the others to go get help. So this is the question, was this fight nessicary because of the verbal abuse used?

edit: I mean fighting in generall. Not just about this fight but about all fights that happen (wars not included)
 

Cakes

New member
Aug 26, 2009
1,036
0
0
Considering I know absolutely nothing about the situation, I can't really say.
 

tthor

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,931
0
0
wtf? i just voted for depends, but all the poll shows for votes is for no
 

-Drifter-

New member
Jun 9, 2009
2,521
0
0
Well, sometimes words don't cut it, and you've got to get your point across with a fist.

PS: Your poll options suck.
 

enzilewulf

New member
Jun 19, 2009
2,130
0
0
tthor said:
wtf? i just voted for depends, but all the poll shows for votes is for no
my bad man I just deleted it because i don't mean what happend... wait shit okay i need to put that back sorry..
 

enzilewulf

New member
Jun 19, 2009
2,130
0
0
-Stranger- said:
Well, sometimes words don't cut it, and you've got to get your point across with a fist.

PS: Your poll options suck.
yeah i know, i put also depends on their now, sorry.
 

historybuff

New member
Feb 15, 2009
1,888
0
0
Your poll choices are insufficient.


There are times when fighting isn't necessary and times when fighting is necessary. So neither of your choices work. It's not one of those all the time. The world is not such a ridiculously black and white place.


Edit: Ah, you added one. There you go.
 

enzilewulf

New member
Jun 19, 2009
2,130
0
0
historybuff said:
Your poll choices are insufficient.


There are times when fighting isn't necessary and times when fighting is necessary. So neither of your choices work. It's not one of those all the time. The world is not such a ridiculously black and white place.


Edit: Ah, you added one. There you go.
Personally I wish i didn't half to add that depends.. I just wish for an impossible world were no one needs to fight... but thats a dream never a reality...
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,468
0
0
I have yet to find a situation where words are not sufficient. There could well be situations where you do need to fight but I have no experience in that area.
 

Mozared

New member
Mar 26, 2009
1,607
0
0
If it came to actual fighting, then both people in question where in fact so riled up they needed to show their discomfort. In that light, yeah, I think it was needed - if it hadn't happened they would've just been left with stuffed up angers.
 

Psiboom

New member
Oct 11, 2009
122
0
0
It's only necessary.. When you are forced into it, but it isn't necessary for the opposing party or person to push you into such a thing, therefore, making it completely unnecessary. It has come to this, it means you fail for not being able to compensate for a non-violent means to end the growing conflict. If there is one, if there isn't... 'wat?'

Besides, battles of wit are much more fun. :3
 

Stevepinto3

New member
Jun 4, 2009
585
0
0
Oh it definitely solves problems. For instance, my sister's boyfriend recently attacked her, so I beat the shit out of him. Nobody abuses my sister and gets away without a few broken bones.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
If the people that you are in conflict with are level headed and reasonable, then physical fighting is pointless.

But if they are intolerant dipshits that can't listen to reason, then I guess the only way to deal with them is a swift punch in the windpipe
 

traceur_

New member
Feb 19, 2009
4,181
0
0
Try taking the high road when your face is being beaten into a concave shape.

Physical fighting is the only kind that has any point to it.

Plus it's really, really fun.
 

demoman_chaos

New member
May 25, 2009
2,254
0
0
It depends on what is going on. Most of the time, it can be avoided. There are times when an goold ol fashioned ass whooping is needed. Those times are few and far between though, and usually only because of previous acts of unessecary violence.
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
It's only pointless if you can convince the one throwing the punches it is.
 
Sep 13, 2009
635
0
0
All I can say is it depends. Most of the time I am a very level headed person, and will not physically retaliate, unless I am hit first. However, if it get's to personal then I am the aggressor. Take this for example: some kid walked into the computer lab while my friend and i were doing some research at school. He then begins to call me douche names, which I ignore. Then he starts attacking my family. I clock him with a chair, I never hear shit from him again.

See, fighting solves stuff sometimes.
 

enzilewulf

New member
Jun 19, 2009
2,130
0
0
traceur_ said:
Try taking the high road when your face is being beaten into a concave shape.

Physical fighting is the only kind that has any point to it.

Plus it's really, really fun.
Now it is appropreate for self defense.
 

sms_117b

Keeper of Brannigan's Law
Oct 4, 2007
2,880
0
0
Violence has resolved more conflicts than anything else. The contrary opinion that violence doesn't solve anything is merely wishful thinking at its worst.