I get what you guys are saying, but I think you're wrong. The thing is, most tools aren't actually "neutral". Yeah, hammers can be used for evil...but it's way easier to use them for good, and if you wanted to do something evil with them like, say, killing your neighbor, there're plenty of other tools that would do a much better job. Put another way, if hammers disappeared tomorrow, the "neighbors murdered" statistic would barely budge, while the "homes constructed" one would see a drastic decrease.Breywood said:This has to be pretty much my opinion. It's a tool, and you can use a tool for everyone's benefit or everyone's detriment. The internet makes it easy to share information and opinions, but it's also the ability to share that information that can be harmful, especially on such subjects as harassment and racism.tippy2k2 said:The internet is neutral.
It's a tool. You might as well ask if a hammer is good for humanity. I can use a hammer to build a house or I can use a hammer to murder my neighbor.
Or for a more extreme example, look at penicillin. Sure, it's a tool. And I guess it could be harmful because, I dunno, overdose, maybe? But the benefits for humanity are huge, and the downsides almost nonexistent, so I'd say penicillin, despite being merely a tool, is definitely a good thing for humanity.
The Internet does have its cons, I'll admit, but I'm pretty certain that it falls firmly on the "good for humanity" side of the scale.